|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Itsthetruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 09:23 AM Original message |
Appeals Court Ruling Bans 3rd Party Candidates From Presidential Debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. Just proves what a fraud the so called two-party system is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itsthetruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 09:35 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Not So Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itsthetruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 09:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Court Decision Link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. Wrong wrong wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itsthetruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 10:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That's Exactly What It Means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
6. Incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 11:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. The trouble is that the "organizers" and "platform" are owned by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 11:49 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. So the third party candidates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itsthetruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Not Incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 11:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I did read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itsthetruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 01:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Do You Agree With The Partisan Ruling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Not exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-11-05 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
7. God, ain't it swell to live in a "democracy"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itsthetruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-05 10:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Seattle Post-Intelligence Editorial On Decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 28th 2024, 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC