|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
jackstraw45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:14 PM Original message |
Gannon + Gosch = BIG MISTAKE: New Coverage a Rove Setup to discredit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Who are they gonna discredit? DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackstraw45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Listen, not dissing ANYONE here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. No, Andy actually started brainstorming here and had a theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. And I don't even think it was Andy who came up with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
40. I recall him starting a thread where things got rolling, but it's possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. it was not andy's theory... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Yes, but he started the ball rolling on the matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 07:41 PM Response to Reply #39 |
56. yes you are sure right mzmolly.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. hard to dispute federal testimony!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
35. No, it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 07:38 PM Response to Reply #35 |
55. well lets put it this way..the judge awarded bonacci a million $$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slaveplanet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 07:47 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. thanks for posting that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 07:58 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. ohh you are quite welcome slaveplanet!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lies and propaganda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 05:00 AM Response to Reply #59 |
86. you two rock and are absolutely correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 12:40 PM Response to Reply #57 |
92. I'm not a Johnny come lately to the justice system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:29 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. Technically, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:23 PM Response to Reply #62 |
71. if my memory suits me, the judge himself questioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaBecky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 08:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
94. Well even if one lied, what about all the others? Are they liers too? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. I agree..it's too ODD that the MSM is playing up this BOGUS angle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Discredited by whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. gee seems to me the talking points memo about teri shiavo was discreditied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
37. I agree, my first thought was hummm,,,,, what are they up to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. You have to be kidding! Rove wants Gannon to go away, not come |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. A - Greed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Who's "WE" and I'd sure like to see your proof. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. "WE" is everyone who participated in the Gannon Wrinkle thread series |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
41. I took part in some of the threads, and have not seen this so called |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 10:19 PM Response to Reply #41 |
80. How about post 34 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #80 |
93. Post # 34 certainly looks like Gannon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaBecky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 08:52 PM Response to Reply #80 |
95. Coincidence Theorists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. Or to discredit the child sex ring? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. Wouldn't a DNA test settle this once and for all ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Didn't the photos of him in highschool in the 70s settle it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Hi Free...haven't run into you in a while! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. not for me it didnt...nor noreen gosch! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. So you're saying this isn't the same person? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:34 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. That's him alright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:56 PM Response to Reply #44 |
79. Agree...why is this being pursued? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BamaBecky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 08:54 PM Response to Reply #44 |
96. No, No, No, No.......that's still very much a part of the story! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vektor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:24 PM Response to Reply #34 |
61. Wait a minute... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:31 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. The Pictures At the Top, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vektor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:44 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Oh, ok... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. ohh please the msm discounted this whole gannon story from the get go.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. Geez... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. fooj..are you following me?? lol..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frederik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
17. Nobody was talking about it anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. because it confuses two separate issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackstraw45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. EXACTLY what I'm trying to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. But the story was Dead. Why take a chance? What would be the point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. I'm not of the belief that Rove is behind this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frederik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
53. Yeah, I understand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
20. I understand what you're saying, but consider this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
23. Have you seen this person? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
29. Look, all it really requires is a simple DNA test to discredit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
30. Deleted message |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:41 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. Deleted message |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:43 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. to be fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 03:46 AM Response to Reply #49 |
85. Too bad people can't see that analysis anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:32 PM Response to Reply #47 |
64. Here's how bad it's gotten: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 10:28 PM Response to Reply #47 |
81. Good job of not crossing DU's rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 10:33 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. And yet the post stays.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RAF (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
31. I mentioned this in the beginning of the week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. Not to mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RAF (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:45 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. further |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
90. There is no way Gannon can be disaffiliated with the White House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malva Zebrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
32. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. That does sound crazy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
43. Deleted message |
jackstraw45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:37 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Thanks for the background. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. How so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackstraw45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:47 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. My mistake! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slaveplanet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:43 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Well you need to read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. Yeah, desensitize the viewers so that when the real story is exposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jose Diablo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
54. Am I the only one here that remembers how Minneapolis was gonna |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kohodog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
58. How many of your co-workers, relatives or acquaintenances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
60. What I find mind boggling is the list that has evolved from the latest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slaveplanet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:37 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Thats not the half of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #60 |
72. its johnny gosch...just for the record to be straight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:45 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Thanks. Big mistake. But...still a J, by gosh. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
67. I personally don't know too much about this ordeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slaveplanet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:03 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. when was Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ramblin_dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
68. Where did the original idea that Gannon = Gosch come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:55 PM Response to Reply #68 |
78. From the DU wrinkle threads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enid602 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
70. gannon/gosch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RAF (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:36 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. one reason is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 11:13 PM Response to Reply #70 |
83. Jaimie Gum/ John Grant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 06:04 AM Response to Reply #70 |
88. I'm trying desparately not to get distracted by this, but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susanna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
73. I felt the same way about Rathergate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
74. The show was great but they need new anchors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ebayfool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 05:45 AM Response to Reply #74 |
87. Bo Dietl is a big GOP supporter, I wouldn't trust him on this stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-05 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
76. It's way too tinfoil-hat for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
84. What's so reasonable about seeing Rove behind everything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 07:02 AM Response to Reply #84 |
89. Not behind everything, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-09-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. as a reasonable guy you should know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Jun 18th 2024, 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC