Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"civilian military contractors" = mercenary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 09:59 AM
Original message
"civilian military contractors" = mercenary
The new propaganda buzz-word for today is "civilian military contractor"

Definition = MERCENARY working for a private army.

For the dis-interested casual reader of the news, this term implants a visual in their mind that a defenseless civilian working on a military project in Iraq has been killed. And of course, this is the purpose of calling them that term, which fits right in with the Bush propaganda machine's fouling of the English language for their sinister goals.

An interesting strategy is revealed in the use of private armies to do the dirty work.

First, in using a private army they are not compelled to adhere to any pre-ordained standard of warfare (Geneva Conventions), thus allowing the "privatized army" to roam free in Iraq as if it were the Wild West and shoot down any perceived threat it deems fit.

This strategy allows the Bush administration to deny involvement in any human rights violations that happen to occur with the excuse - "it wasn't our troops who did it, but we'll launch an investigation"..and of course the "investigation" will go no where and fade into our memory.

I said OUR MEMORY. The Iraqis will not forget.

Second, the "official" casualty count becomes a smaller number to report in the news because the "private army" does the real dangerous stuff and thus becomes a "political" win for the administration.

Third, we see one result of a republican ideological point (privatization) in action. Privatization means - no accountability, no govt oversight, and you can skirt the law or completely avoid it to arrive at your goal.

They are fascists.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Also, when they add up the KIAs
They don't need to count the 'civilian contractors.' One company reports they've already lost 13 people in Iraq!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m-jean03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not always true -
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 10:35 AM by m-jean03
A number of civilian contractors are only linguists, including a good friend. Others serve other non-mercenary positions. When you hear of an American "civilian contractor" death, you ought not automatically assume they are a soldier of fortune.

Example:

WASHINGTON, Sept. 30, 2003 - A third person possibly tied to espionage at the military detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba -- this one **a civilian contractor who worked as a translator** -- was charged today with making false, fictitious or fraudulent statements regarding computer disks he carried during a flight from Egypt.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2003/n10012003_200309307.html

However, I do agree with your point that these hired guns ought to be called by their rightful name!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. You can bet yer ass if they were there drilling freshwater wells
(for instance) they would have made sure to mention that.

Calling them "civilian contractors" in this case is lying by omission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about Corporate Combatants?
I prefer to label them as Corporate Combatants.
Or how about privatized soldiers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC