Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Trillion Dollar Income Shift, Part 1 (Wealth Distribution Inequality)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:33 AM
Original message
The Trillion Dollar Income Shift, Part 1 (Wealth Distribution Inequality)
For three decades a ‘Great Leveling’ of incomes between classes in America occurred as the standard of living rose for tens of millions of American workers and their families from 1942 to the mid-1970s. American working class families received a share of record gains in productivity. Real wages rose. Guaranteed retirement benefits—private pensions and social security—were greatly expanded. Health insurance plans were negotiated. Medicare was added for the aged. K-12 public education was truly free and public colleges and universities nearly so. Unions represented 25%-35% of the work force, and typically 60% and more in key strategic sectors like construction, manufacturing, and transport. The tax burden for workers rose relatively slowly and corporations and the wealthy still paid a fair share.

Then, after three decades, the hourglass of history was inverted. Stood on its head. The ‘Great Leveling’ of incomes became, after a brief interregnum from 1974-1978, a ‘Great Reversal’. From the mid-1970s until the present a widening income gap began to open up, as it once had in the decade leading up to the Great Depression after 1929. Income inequality grew as income shifted from working class families to the wealthiest households and corporations. From the early 1980s on income inequality widened, deepened, and accelerated until today well over $1 trillion in income is being transferred every year from the roughly 90 million working class families in America to corporations and the wealthiest non-working class households.

<snip>

There are approximately 114 million households in the U.S. today. The wealthiest 1% make up 1.4 million households. They now receive between 19%-21.5% of the annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the United States, depending on the source cited. That’s up from 8% in 1980. Today’s 19%-21.5% also represents a nearly full recovery of the roughly 22% share of national income the top 1% received in 1928 just prior to the stock market crash of 1929, the depression of the 1930s, and the ‘Great Leveling’ of class incomes that followed. That same 1% today also hold more than 35% of all assets and wealth of the country—about $17 trillion. They own 51% of all stocks and 70% of all bonds, own homes worth $3 million and have a net worth of $6 million. The bottom 50% of all households, nearly 60 million families—all working class—in comparison own only 2.5% of the country’s total assets and wealth.

<snip>

The authors’ data also show that the incomes of the wealthy 1% have recovered from the 2001 recession, the economic shock of 9-11, the dot.com bust of 2000-02, and other negative developments earlier this decade. Since 2003 the incomes of the wealthiest 1% households are once again back on their long term expansion track that began in 1978-1982. In stark contrast, the 90 million working class families have not recovered at all from the 2001 recession and other economic effects, but have steadily fallen behind from 2001 through 2006. This dual fact is the defining economic characteristic and legacy of the George W. Bush presidency.

http://www.kyklosproductions.com/posts/index.php?p=57
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's eliminate the estate tax for the mega-rich, while the rest of us stiffs...

... take out reverse mortgages on our homes to pay the bills during retirement. Thus ensuring we have nothing to leave to our kids, because all our wealth has been transferred -- again -- to the monied class.

:grr:

Class warfare? Bring it on! :nuke: Every Dem candidate should be willing to say you bet this is class warfare, 'cause we're all being bled dry by the uber-elite.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, it's class warfare-- and THEY started it and THEY are winning n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. These dynasties are self-perpetuating
Some of the wealthiest people in the nation, such as the Walton family of Wal-Mart fame, have bankrolled efforts to eliminate the Estate Tax. This is where a lot of the rightwing stink tanks come from, and why you've heard all that trickle-down propaganda night and day for decades. This massive influx of money has had its effect but with Democrats in control of Congress now I think the Estate Tax repeal will pretty much die a natural death on January 1, 2011.

This means the exclusion would revert to what it was in 2001: $675,000 for individuals and twice that for couples who leave estates to their heirs. It would be fair to increase this exemption level to around $2 million and it is likely that something like that will occur prior to 2011. But look out, there are those who will try to exploit that in attempts to totally repeal the Estate Tax or get the exemption ceiling raised as high as they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good book to read:"Perfectly Legal" by David Cay Johnston
http://www.amazon.com/Perfectly-Legal-Campaign-Benefit-Everybody/dp/1591840198

(Not recommended if you already have high blood pressure. <sarcasm>)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Thanks, I might buy that.
Looks like a good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Link does not work for me...
Can you correct it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I hit the link in the OP and it worked for me.
I tried again and got no joy, then a third attempt was successful. Keep trying, it's worth the effort to get there. Lots of good stuff in the article.

Here again is the link: http://www.kyklosproductions.com/posts/index.php?p=57
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. THIS is the "Reagan revolution".
A spiteful reaction to the civil insurrection against the VietNam War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Trillions of dollars of Federal debt amassed since the Gipper now repose as wealth
of the the most affluent created by the grossly inequitable and ludicrous tax policies of Saint Gipper which have been continued by Bush I and Bush II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yup, that's the shell game
Not really a very sophisticated game: cut taxes for rich folks and borrow to make up for lost revenues. Everything else is all lies.


http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Reverse Robin Hood
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 09:36 AM by Octafish
"It's like Robin Hood in reverse." -- Paul Wellstone



"Gangsters" is the nicest thing to call them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Exactly, the graph proves our theses and the big 'puke lie: their #1 job is to
transfer what's rightfully the US treasury to the pockets of multi-millionaires/billionaires robbing the "lock-box" in the meanwhile so there will be the excuse to welsh on social security benefits/Medicare which has been their plan all along. Curiously, tens of millions of Amurikans who are being really harmed now and will be financially killed down the road still eat up this big 'puke lie and support all 'puke initiatives including pre-emptive war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. It's also how the idiot Reagan has gotten such a pass
Those same ultra-rich folks bankrolled propaganda foundations to tell us forever and ever how wonderful Saint Gipper was. They've already done the same thing for Junior. $500 million already in his post-presidency propaganda foundation. All donors insist on remaining anonymous, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yes, we were told that government is "the problem"
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 09:46 AM by antigop
And less regulation was a good thing.

And people lost their pensions and retiree health care and jobs -- because of TOO LITTLE regulation, not too much.

And people were told to be "self-sufficient" -- at the same time safety nets were being destroyed, the cost of education skyrocketed, and now jobs are being shipped outside the US.

And, sadly, people bought into this propaganda.

<edit to add> BTW, the first cash balance pension plan went in in 1985. Coincidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Saint Gipper proved government was the problem
He took over and made it a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes, they proved it could be a problem instead of an expression of our collective will n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. They fear the government as an instrument of the people.
Hence they want to destroy it, keeping only the instruments of force, to protect themselves with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. "The government is us; we are the government, you and I. " -- Teddy Roosevelt n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. They had better.
Bet they hear footsteps right now. Heh heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Funny you never hear any talk about defense spending 'reform'
And you'll never see publicans wringing their hands, worrying that we won't be able to sustain Paris Hilton tax cuts at cuttent levels. Or that the treasury bonds we've sold China and Mexico don't mean anything because they're worthless pieces of paper.

But the discourse is changing thanks mainly to our miracle in the midterms. Soon I hope to see representatives on the floor of the House and Senate debating whether we really need yet another monster aircraft carrier, named after yet another loser publican president, to plow the seven seas and intimidate smaller nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Report: Income Gap Grew Fastest in New England
Rich-poor gap grew faster in region
Study: Middle class shrinking

By Associated Press | March 23, 2007

The gap between rich and poor grew at a faster rate in New England than in any other US region over the last 15 years, according to a University of New Hampshire study released yesterday.

(snip)

Over the 15 years studied -- a period when income inequality grew nationwide -- New England's income growth among people with the highest income outpaced the nation, while income losses among the poorest exceeded the national average.

For example, inflation-adjusted household income for the top 20 percent of New England's population rose 20 percent over 15 years, reaching $185,000.

For those in the bottom 20 percent, income fell 5 percent, to $12,437.

More:
http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2007/03/23/rich_poor_gap_grew_faster_in_region/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Real good article - nice and fresh too.
People are starting to wake up about this, methinks.

Thanks for the link. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
20. Sadly, we will have to go through the entire labor movement again in this country n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jun 08th 2024, 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC