Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nine more US soldiers killed in Iraq (updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 04:47 AM
Original message
Nine more US soldiers killed in Iraq (updated)
Edited on Wed May-23-07 05:12 AM by maddezmom
Source: AFP

BAGHDAD (AFP) - Nine US troops were killed on a single day around

Iraq, the US military reported Wednesday, bringing to 85 the number of servicemen killed in one of the most violent months of the war so far.

All nine of the soldiers and marines were killed on Tuesday in a series of incidents, some of them in an area where the troops were searching for three of their comrades who were captured 11 days ago.

Three soldiers were killed when their patrol was hit by a roadside bomb attack south of Baghdad, one was shot dead in the capital and another hit by a booby trap as his unit operated near where the men went missing.

Two more soldiers were killed by another roadside bomb north of Baghdad, while two marines died in action in the restive western province of Anbar, according to statements from US command in Baghdad.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070523/wl_afp/iraqusunresttoll_070523100148



BAGHDAD, May 23 (Reuters) - Seven U.S. soldiers were killed in four separate attacks in Iraq on Tuesday, most of them by roadside bombs, the U.S. military said on Wednesday.

In the worst single attack, three soldiers were killed and two were wounded when their patrol was hit by "multiple improvised explosive devices", the military said in a statement. It gave no location for the attack.


http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L23320938.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. ....
Way to go America!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. How many will die during this long song and dance that apparently
must take place until September?? It's all such a waste. The American Congress goes on vacation. The Iraqi Parliament goes on vacation. No vacation for troops. They'll continue to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
50. Lots more Gold Star Mothers this AssClown will Make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. The insurgency appears to have lured us into a trap.
The planned kidnapping incuded post kidnapping preparation for the search. This is a pretty sophisticated insurgency we are fighting. They are learning how to hurt us, they are the ones who appear to be agile and adaptive, not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jollyreaper2112 Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. uhoh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. While I agree with your points, I take issue with your language, specifically
"insurgency". I prefer the term "Resistance," as 'insurgency' connotes that there was a time when members approved of the occupation and only rose up against it after growing dissatisfied with the occupation. In other words, "insurgency" downplays the idea of Iraqi nationalism, whereas "Resistance" foregrounds Iraqi nationalism and opposition to the occupation as an affront to Iraqi nationalism (and, to a lesser extent, pan-Arab nationalism).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. Point taken. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
32. So...we are like the old imperial British army was during our revolutionary war.
Marching in large tight formations, in wide open fields, with great big X's on their coats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
33. You're giving them too much credit.
If there's blame, it's the utterly incompetent planners that decided to cease all of their normal operations on this poorly thought out "hunt."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. No. Warren is correct
The NYTimes frontpage has an account (with photos) of one soldier killed by an IED which was really a pressure activated land mine. The platoon thought they were safer avoiding the roads but only too late discovered the fields had become just as deadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. No I think this was in fact the expected reaction.
They analyzed the escalation, noted that it actually weakened our forces outside Baghdad and they have exploited our weaknesses. We are losing this war, we are losing a war of attrition in a foreign land we are occupying for no good reason, and we will leave either on our terms or on theirs. Given that we do not have the political strength or wisdom to accept this defeat, my guess is that we will be leaving on their terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. Good observations. You will note also they took out a bridge...
...and are attempting to take out more bridges, spanning the Tigris. (The most violent action is east of Baghdad while U.S. soldiers are west of the river.) A small-time guerrilla operation usually doesn't want to or is incapable of blowing bridges. This represents a more "big-time" military approach which says in essence: "we don't need those bridges; you do." I can't help but liken the "Green Zone" and its surroundings to some medieval castle under siege.

I think it is becoming clear that our commanders don't know how to fight this war -- blank check or no -- and are being outsmarted.

The key for Bush is to keep the war going, preferably escalated and with another front opened on/in Iran, so that when (?) he leaves office, his policy of permawar will be sealed and delivered to WHOMEVER wins. In this manner he will have fully succeeded. By the way, permawar means permanent unitary presidential powers (the thin legal justification for this dictatorial outlook). Authoritarian control here at home and rank blow-it-out imperialism abroad is the goal, now and into the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. FUBAR!
May OUR Troops RIP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. More soldiers are being killed since the surge.......
so what is Commander Bush's next move?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That just shows that the surge is working..........
:sarcasm: at least in the minds of the right wingnuts who support this cluster-fuck. The more U.S. soldiers die, the more we're succeeding. :silly: You can't argue with logic like that. The Bush administration has a weird way of measuring success. They make stuff up and call it "victory".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jollyreaper2112 Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. whenever I hear the bushies say surge
I'm reminded of those stupid commercials with the trendy extreme gen-xers screaming "suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurge!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. Whatever he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babydollhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Where is the outrage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. The "surge"? More like a surge in American troop deaths.
You would need, literally, about 1.5 million troops to provide any kind of security in Iraq. There would need to be a near-total saturation of troops at every street corner in every major Iraqi city, at a minimum, to accomplish what the so-called "surge" is supposed to do.

Short of that, the troops and the Iraqi people are simply cannon fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. K for the troops and their families
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. this needs two more REC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. My god
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cults4Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. sorry troops youre there well into 2008 and probably much longer
after september we will capitulate to Little Boots again. We will keep doing it because the party faithful on both sides have real trouble not buying into BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. 85 so far this month?!?! And timelines were removed and funding still going to be approved?!?!??
:wtf: :mad: :wtf: :mad: :wtf: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sanskritwarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'm not trying to be nitpicky but the AP article is wrong
the number is 80 US personnel, now if they mean all countries personnel, then it's not wrong. Icasualties say 80 US, 5 other nations........This is how meme's get started where people breathlessly claim that we are hiding the "REAL NUMBER" of dead if there are two sets of numbers used, it confuses people........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. I agree
The correct number of US troops killed is 80.

I also despise those stupid memes whereby people project some imagined conspiracy whereby the US government is hiding war deaths. Not only would such a procedure be impossible in practical terms, but this government and military is clearly too incompetent to pull off such a feat should it be possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. If anything, U.S. military is more likely to inflate enemy casualties.
See, for example, David Halberstam's "Best and Brightest" for how this obsession with body count manifested itself during Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. True
Edited on Wed May-23-07 11:22 AM by alcibiades_mystery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
info being Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. Glad to know our party is 100% behind this
Even worse than the Americans, I wonder how many innocent Iraqis died today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. These soldiers are fighting a cause that was lost the
Edited on Wed May-23-07 09:03 AM by LibDemAlways
day of the invasion, because the fools in Congress and the neocon warmongers who instigated this clusterfuck were too stupid to understand one simple fact. If you illegally invade and occupy a country, you will not be welcome. And if that country has centuries-old ethnic divisions, you will be pouring fuel on the flames.

Apparently four years later they still don't understand that they lost and that the only course is to get the hell out before many more thousands are dead and those scenes of the fall of Saigon are repeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
38. Yeah, the helicopters on the roof of the embassy and
people screaming all over the place to get on the last helicopters... really charming. Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. Wasted lives. Fighting in a war for corporate profits.
Our real enemies got away because Bush and his oil cronies put money over patriotism.

RIP, Troops. You had no control over where you were fighting. You died honorable deaths.

The corrupt Commander In Chief and his insane neocon cronies is where lies the dishonor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jollyreaper2112 Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. next verse, same as the first!
This is the war that never ends,
Yes, it goes on and on, my friend
Some assholes started fighting it not knowing what it was,
And they'll continue waging it forever just because—
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. Sitting fucking ducks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Bedard best captured the "Sitting Duck" feeling I had in Viet Nam:

"Sitting Duck"
Michael Bedard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. Nice one Capt Mac


Remember the ZPU-4 / Type 56
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
29. Apparently, the Iraqi Resistance knows how to "surge" also. -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
31. Stack em higher and higher junior - YOU fucking asshole!!

Grass Bush

Pile the bodies high in Austerlitz and Waterloo Iraq
Shovel them under and let me work--
I am the grass; bush; I cover all.

And pile them high in Gettyburg Baghdad
And pile them high in Ypres and Vedum Mossoul and Al Fallaujah

Two years, ten years, and passengers ask the conductor:
What place is this?

I am the grass bush.
Let me work.

Carl Sandburg


Support the war - Donate a Son a Daughter
The GOP working for a better America
God Bless America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
34. And yet...
...we're giving Bush more money. Swell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
37. leftofthedial had a point earlier about Dems caving to Mr. 28% -
You think it's collusion and not cowardice?

Or could it be a little of BOTH?

Either way, funding this mass slaughter should be deemed CRIMINAL, with all involved facing consequences for their blatant disregard of our military and the welfare of their families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherMother4Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
42. K&R - Rest in peace, dear soldiers, May your families find peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. They will find no peace
I know a number of Gold Star Mothers most in their eighties. they have never found peace.

Ask any parent who has lost a child

The gold star mothers from my war are very very bitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherMother4Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I'm afraid you may be right - & the returning soldiers will need help coping.
I know several Vietnam veterans that are still suffering the physical, emotional, and mental effects of agent orange and the horrors of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. They will get little help "coping"
Used up---- thrown away

The motto of the VA and the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
49. "Bring em on" shouted the AWOL CHIMPANZEE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
51. I'M HOLDING CONGRESS & * RESPONSIBLE NOW!
THEY HAVE ALL LIED!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jun 02nd 2024, 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC