|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 05:55 PM Original message |
MSNBC reporting Sandy Berger to plead guilty to misd of mishandling docs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onefreespiritedchick
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes, I just saw this on MSNBC. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skylarmae
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. yes, but who outed Valerie Plame? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. An absolute freakin' travesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. AP link here: Berger to Plead Guilty to Taking Material |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
heyphillip
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. Sandy Berger to plead guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. Berger to Plead Guilty to Taking Materials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 12:33 AM Response to Reply #6 |
18. I WANT EQUAL JUSTICE ON THE PLAME CASE!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. Bush will seek the death penalty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. I thought he was cleared. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountebank
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 07:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I heard that, too. Still, if those after-action reports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 04:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
65. No, he not only took the documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logansquare
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 05:33 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. They were photocopies of documents, not originals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Originals vs Copies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logansquare
![]() |
Sun Apr-03-05 07:12 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. See my post below. I agree. But don't swallow the GOP spin on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuttle
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 07:19 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. He *was* cleared -- reported by WSJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountebank
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 12:19 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Obviously they didn't report it because it wasn't true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gannon Man Date
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. I thought he was completely cleared of all these allegations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Guy
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 09:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I thought he was cleared too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpy the poopthrower
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. what a non-story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
James T. Kirk
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 08:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Um, no. He was not supposed to remove ANY documents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 09:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Actually, I Think You Are Mistaken. You Can Take Copies/Notes But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
James T. Kirk
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 06:41 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. No, you are the one who is mistaken. Notes cannot be taken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoping4Change
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 04:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
68. You don't think NYT is MediaWhore/GOP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 07:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
23. No, it is not very serious, just slightly serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynne
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Afraid not - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Again, IIFC, There ARE Procedures For Taking Notes & Copies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyfly
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 03:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. The problem here is that the documents in question are classified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 09:30 AM Response to Reply #19 |
31. straining at a gnat, and swallowing a camel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynne
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 08:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Notes are okay - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 08:48 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. But wasn't the big fuss over the idea that he was trying to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynne
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 04:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
46. The big fuss and the actual charge against him - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 02:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
42. Not absurd when the documents are classified; in fact, it's policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Do you have any support for your claim that the docs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 01:45 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Yes, sad to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hezekkia
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 05:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
70. proper procedure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cicero
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 02:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
44. I think the hooraw concerns handwritten notes on those copies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stubertmcfly
![]() |
Thu Mar-31-05 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. why is it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
James T. Kirk
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 06:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Berger was dumb, and that's why he got caught. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laylah
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 08:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Who you talkin' about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
James T. Kirk
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #27 |
54. Who was behind it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
James T. Kirk
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 11:28 AM Response to Reply #27 |
55. Profile? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 08:51 AM Response to Reply #14 |
28. If Berger were one of the real culpets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc05
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 10:05 AM Response to Reply #14 |
33. He's not frying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
25. Makes one wonder if a future Dem administration will nail anyone from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
29. ABC WNT last night left out the "misdemeanor" part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
30. Berger lied about taking and destroying the documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CityDem
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 03:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. Martha Stewart went to jail for much less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
32. What a dumb-ass. At least he's finally admitting it, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
34. I can't stand it when they call him Sandy Bergler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demokatgurrl
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
36. More diversion to distract us from the real criminals in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bossy Monkey
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
37. Berger Pleads Guilty to Taking Materials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geomon666
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 02:22 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. My question is...Why? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
39. Why did he do this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoBotherMe
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 02:29 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. That's why it's a misdemeanor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disfronted
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 11:40 AM Response to Reply #40 |
56. Actually, he admitted he did it on purpose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SouthernDem2004
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 01:39 PM Response to Reply #40 |
58. It was a misdemeanor because of a plea agreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meti57b
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
41. Wow... great week for bush! Comes off as a champ in the "culture of life". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
43. Won't make much difference with all the media whoop-de-doo about the Pope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
47. Why did he do it? My hunch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoBotherMe
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. He wasn't given access to the originals, he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 04:14 PM Response to Reply #49 |
64. So that means that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
50. Ex-Clinton Aide Pleads Guilty to Taking Documents(Reuters) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Did we ever find the anthrax attackers or who outed Valarie Plame? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemFromMem
![]() |
Fri Apr-01-05 06:19 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Last year's joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realFedUp
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
57. Berger to get Wen Ho Leed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dover
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
59. Berger admits destroying materials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Ah Sandy, I believed every denial... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoping4Change
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Rethugs are going to make hay with this. WTF was he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. They already have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoping4Change
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 04:08 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. I knew he was accused and then denied it. I was wondering if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 04:35 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Because the documents were so secret |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
67. I'm always amazed by the moral relativism by some here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoping4Change
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 05:00 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I agree with you completely. What he did is wrong, period not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Thanks, Hoping4Change! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logansquare
![]() |
Sat Apr-02-05 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
73. He stole COPIES of documents, because notes weren't allowed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Sun Apr-03-05 02:48 AM Response to Reply #73 |
76. They were more than copies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito
![]() |
Sun Apr-03-05 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
75. I've tried to piece together a scenario that fits. Thoughts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 14th 2024, 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC