You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #96: The symbiotic relationship [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Gin Blossom Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
96. The symbiotic relationship
I want to applaud some of the more thoughtful discussion on this thread, like between Armstead and JoePhilly.

I also want to try to put down a thought I've had for some time. Of course, "the Dem establishment spawned the tea party" is a rhetorical flourish. Yes the Koch's, Armey, Fox News et all created the teabaggers, the crazies, who now somehow have enough power to negotiate the terms of our surrender.

Something stuck in my mind about the uprising in Egypt. Mubarak held enough popular support to stay in power because it was him or the "crazies" (somehow the "crazies" always seem to be right-wing fundamentalists). And that's what we were sold - sure, there's some human rights/democracy issues with Mubarak but he's a moderate, just look at those crazies - that's why he's our ally.

"Kubuki Theatre" is thrown around here a lot, and when I used it a party with low-information Democratic friends, I found I had to explain it. Perhaps a better phraseology would be - like Mubarak had a symbiotic relationship with his "crazies", I see the Obama administration and the Democratic establishment as having a symbiotic relationship with the tea baggers. They give the uninspiring but easy slogan for 2012 - "Do you want the crazies to take over?" And I hear the Rahmian undertone, "Where else are you going to go?" And in dog-whistle frequencies, I hear "these Tea Partiers are Americans with their legitimate concerns" simultaneously with "our drug-addled professional left-wing fringe extremists probably want us to dismantle the pentagon! (chuckle)". And yes, as someone involved with my local Democratic party, I'm insulted.

Whatever Daou's history, which for some here seems to be a substitute for actually being able to discuss anything, I totally agree with:

"Look at Obama and Bush’s big swings in approval – the American public is far more malleable than Democrats acknowledge. In a nation where anxiety abounds, strong, principled, powerful, determined voices will change minds. Republicans know that and they have a system to take advantage of it."

Which leads me to a heresy - after a lot of thought I would welcome and get behind any credible Democratic challenger to Obama. It would tap into some of the awesome grassroots power I witnessed in 2008. And like the relentless triumphant Rethug planners, I'm willing to brace for the fact that we may lose a few battles. Does that ever stop them?

Americans are not apathetic zombies who only care about "Dancing With Stars". I think a "strong, principled, powerful, determined voice" is more important than the "good cop, bad cop" "austerity" menu we've been given, and believe me, I fucking hate the bad cop.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC