History of Feminism

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)

21. Start with your Jury black list.

Mon Feb 24, 2014, 11:16 AM

Feb 2014

Is it full? I just checked mine and the first three on the list are "internet women".

I do not and never had anyone on Ignore because I want to be on their juries.

If you have MRAers on your Ignore list you are not in their jury pool. I guarantee you that not a single MRAer has you on their Ignore list because they want the opportunity to judge you.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Support for femnists on DU is strong [View all] BainsBane Feb 2014 OP

I must say that I RBStevens Feb 2014 #1

good point. TDale313 Feb 2014 #2

I just used my jury blacklist. KitSileya Feb 2014 #7

I've never had anyone on "ignore." question everything Feb 2014 #3

Yes, very good point. BainsBane Feb 2014 #4

Also true of the gun humpers. nt DURHAM D Feb 2014 #47

Mirror your Jury Blacklist to your Ignore list. AtheistCrusader Feb 2014 #5

If I may ask... theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #9

If you click on "My Account" KitSileya Feb 2014 #10

Thanks very much! theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #13

Always happy to help a fellow Reprobate! KitSileya Feb 2014 #15

I'm feeling especially old this morning.... theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #18

I know! I am feeling old too. KitSileya Feb 2014 #20

To be perfectly honest... theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #23

I totally understand where you're coming from. KitSileya Feb 2014 #26

Interesting. I've never known this question everything Feb 2014 #29

Off to the greatest... awoke_in_2003 Feb 2014 #6

Don't have an ignore list theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #8

I have never used the Ignore option except to exercise it on my own. You make an excellent point. CTyankee Feb 2014 #11

I've never volunteered to serve on juries theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #14

Oh, jury duty is short term. KitSileya Feb 2014 #17

So if you have someone on ignore and then one of their posts is alerted, does that mean Tanuki Feb 2014 #12

I'm not sure about that. Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #16

Start with your Jury black list. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #21

Hmmm I only have five spaces and they are filled with the usual suspects. Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #22

LOL DURHAM D Feb 2014 #25

Your hide was the one that prompted this OP BainsBane Feb 2014 #30

I'm seeing that too JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #19

I just started using ignore ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #24

trashing it means you won't serve on a jury. boston bean Feb 2014 #27

I hadn't realized that BainsBane Feb 2014 #32

That's not actually true about trashed threads - I get called to juries in threads petronius Feb 2014 #33

I hope everyone reads this carefully. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #35

Oh, really? BainsBane Feb 2014 #36

I also have been called to jury on threads I have trashed. MadrasT Feb 2014 #37

Are you absolutely sure about that. boston bean Feb 2014 #42

I am not absolutely sure about anything. MadrasT Feb 2014 #45

I don't believe that list is up to date. boston bean Feb 2014 #44

I am sure about trashed threads, yes (it has even happened to me since petronius Feb 2014 #54

It happened to me a few weeks ago. DLevine Feb 2014 #57

yes, indeed. I think that may be why a lot of this crap gets by juries... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #63

I have one person on Ignore, and 3 or 4 on the Jury blacklist. riqster Feb 2014 #28

I hate to tell you this but, it is already on the wane. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #31

Awwwww.... Squinch Feb 2014 #34

So, I cleared my ignore list after this post... TDale313 Feb 2014 #38

Perhaps you can ignore them without using the list? BainsBane Feb 2014 #39

Yeah, makes sense TDale313 Feb 2014 #40

I need to take my own advice BainsBane Feb 2014 #41

It's tough, but the way this is set up boston bean Feb 2014 #43

I think understanding how we diminish our own jury pool DURHAM D Feb 2014 #46

But looking on the bright side... MadrasT Feb 2014 #48

I don't believe them. nt DURHAM D Feb 2014 #56

Perhaps, but (runs off to check...) 149 people *have* trashed this group. MadrasT Feb 2014 #60

Why would anybody trash this group? RBStevens Feb 2014 #62

I don't see what's so offensive either. I've posted extensively in this Group nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #68

I'm questioning myself now, but I always thought that if boston bean Feb 2014 #49

Logically what you are saying makes sense as a "should be" model. MadrasT Feb 2014 #50

I guess it is time for a direct question in ATA. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #51

You know. It's amazing to me boston bean Feb 2014 #52

I know. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #55

I noticed that. It's a shame. nt DLevine Feb 2014 #58

I'm shocked, shocked I tell you. MadrasT Feb 2014 #59

I spent some time yesterday going throuth the ATA RBStevens Feb 2014 #61

Noted as well... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #65

Boy, do you and I think alike... I was just about to post that in response... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #64

Be careful. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #66

Ha! Yeah, that has to be coming... hlthe2b Feb 2014 #67

I'm glad to see the discussion, too TDale313 Feb 2014 #53