Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The Bernie campaign never stole anything. Discontinue spreading this misinformation. [View all]retrowire
(10,345 posts)61. Whole OP is false?
Nope. Just read it. The facts are right there.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
227 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Bernie campaign never stole anything. Discontinue spreading this misinformation. [View all]
retrowire
Dec 2015
OP
Liar. It's more like adjoining hotel rooms with the adjoining security door missing
tdb63
Dec 2015
#177
Yes, why did they fire Josh Uretsky? Because bernie wanted to throw an innocent man under the
Cha
Dec 2015
#225
Hmmm... trust the media orrr trust the actual security firm responsible? Hmmmm... nt
retrowire
Dec 2015
#48
This Citizen Would Never Suspect That Mere Facts Would Stand In Way Of Team HRC
cantbeserious
Dec 2015
#3
Hmmm... trust the media orrr trust the actual security firm responsible? Hmmmm... nt
retrowire
Dec 2015
#47
Didn't read the official statement from the security firm in my OP? lol dude stop lmao nt
retrowire
Dec 2015
#18
Dirty campaign, huh? You mean like stealing data? No, not that dirty. That's Sanders territory.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#14
Didn't read the official statement from the security firm in my OP? lol dude stop lmao nt
retrowire
Dec 2015
#21
"only one campaign took actions that could possibly have led to it retaining data to which it should
DanTex
Dec 2015
#26
The word "retained" was used by the vendor. I get that you disagree with the vendor, but
DanTex
Dec 2015
#34
Yup. Bernie's campaign stole data. Your own links show that. May even have retained the data.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#68
They definitely accessed it improperly, and they may or may not have retained the data.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#76
It's very simple. The data was stolen, nobody knows what they did with it afterwards.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#128
Everyone knows they stole it. Nobody knows what they did with it after they stole it.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#137
LOL. Dodge. But I get it, when it's Clinton's data, there's a whole different standard.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#148
Yeah, it's a dodge because I treat people online how I'd treat them in real life.
retrowire
Dec 2015
#152
This is clearly opinion and speculation. Which has no room in the world of facts. nt
retrowire
Dec 2015
#23
Yep. Ad nauseam. And they're still in denial that Sanders campaign did anything wrong.
BlueCaliDem
Dec 2015
#17
"only one campaign took actions that could possibly have led to it retaining data
DanTex
Dec 2015
#30
Hmmm... trust the media orrr trust the actual security firm responsible? Hmmmm... nt
retrowire
Dec 2015
#43
That quote is from the actual security firm. From your link. Did you even read it?
DanTex
Dec 2015
#45
Everyone knows who it is. They mentioned the Sanders campaign by name earlier in the article.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#55
Outside of the Bernie bubble, everyone knows exactly what happened: Bernie's campaign stole data.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#65
The access logs demonstrate that they did. And you're the one who made this OP, claiming that
DanTex
Dec 2015
#119
The list of logs shows improper access, i.e. stealing data. Like I said, what they did with the
DanTex
Dec 2015
#125
OK, send my all your usernames and passwords, I'll just go checking around, I promise I won't
DanTex
Dec 2015
#133
We know that the Bernie camp looked at data they shouldn't have had access to, the only question is
DanTex
Dec 2015
#62
Not "sure" of anything, just like you won't be after I look through all your private data.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#151
I don't know the legal details, depending on the contract, it could easily be the case that she
DanTex
Dec 2015
#165
Hmmm... trust the media orrr trust the actual security firm responsible? Hmmmm... nt
retrowire
Dec 2015
#44
Yes that table would be impossible to construct without magical mystical powers and a little help
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2015
#112
If they wanted the data they would grab the data, not fart around constructing detailed queries for
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2015
#116
These people have no understanding nor intention to understand how any of this works in real life.
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2015
#117
Hmmm... trust the media orrr trust the actual security firm responsible? Hmmmm... nt
retrowire
Dec 2015
#39
I do not care if unethically they went into her data and hand wrote notes or downloaded. Theft.
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#59
It is that bright light of integrity that is blinding so many. Cheating, ... Gets one a shrug.
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#80
He stole data. Download, Notes or Brain. He stole data. This is not a tough one.
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#113
No it doesn't. Snopes was pretty equivocal -- and it is an outdated post at this point.
SunSeeker
Dec 2015
#201
So how many times has the Hill Campaign been looking through the Sanders data?
SoapBox
Dec 2015
#123
If I enter your database and look at your modeling files, have I not ...
1StrongBlackMan
Dec 2015
#159
So was it the Clinton campaign or the DNC that took the guy into the back room
mythology
Dec 2015
#221