Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary has had 113 minutes of network news pre-election coverage, Bernie 10. [View all]Treant
(1,968 posts)63. And there it is.
The backhanded bullshit insults from the Grand Cult of Personality.
Y'know what? See you after Super Tuesday. I'll vote for Mrs. Clinton. You vote for whomever you feel will do the best job.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary has had 113 minutes of network news pre-election coverage, Bernie 10. [View all]
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
OP
Hillary has had 113 minutes of network news pre-election coverage, Bernie 10.
Tommy2Tone
Dec 2015
#3
Yet the 2 most covered, Clinton & Trump, are the front-runners. Coincidence? I think not.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#6
Even with Hillary's negative coverage -she surges in the polls compared to Sanders.
riversedge
Dec 2015
#12
Sure if covering her townhalls, speeches, rallies, and pressers is negative - which it is not.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#13
Well, I only watch the networks which were measured in the article--and until
riversedge
Dec 2015
#15
Her private server/email problem is a different issue than the Benghazi hearings.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#40
The wisdom of her *privatizing her email* IS DIFFERENT than focusing on the Bengazi part of it!
cascadiance
Dec 2015
#96
Much of the coverage of Hillary has been negative with a particular focus on the email nontroversy
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2015
#7
Not exactly. Her campaign coverage was 113 mins and other coverage was 117 mins (separate)
Turn CO Blue
Dec 2015
#42
Social media is an equal opportunity venue, the MSM has baked-in bias with selective coverage.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#16
Many people especially older people still get their news from the MSM. And the "news" they receive
think
Dec 2015
#24
They're covering Clinton's/Trump's townhalls, rallies, speeches, and pressers - a distinct advantage
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#11
That's because the congressional hearing was not included in the survey of election coverage.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#21
FFS, that's a ridiculous notion. It's the media's job to provide equitable campaign coverage.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#25
And I've corrected that notion by pointing out the MSM is covering her events in their entirety.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#37
It's all bullshit and fluff with the MSM. Feel-good coverage and contrived controversy.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#38
They are covering her events in their entirety. That's a distinct advantage.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#30
MSM= Misanthropic Sycophant Monsters who have the same boss as Hillary, the 1% .
orpupilofnature57
Dec 2015
#32
The data was obtained from the Tyndall Report for the WaPo article I posted. * Edited for video.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#70
Nonsense. Analyst Andrew Tyndall is respected in the industry of network data collection.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#78
Oh dear, so angry. Why are Clinton fans so angry? Worried about a 2008 faceplant redux?
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#85
It is bullshit and has strangled O'Malley's candidacy in the crib. Damn shame, really.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#72
The MSM are driving the narrative just like they did in 2007 promoting Giuliani v. Hillary 24/7.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#71
Untrue. The networks have a biased agenda. The agenda is poorly disguised corporate propaganda.
Enthusiast
Dec 2015
#93
Funny how Democrats were united on how the Corp-Media was pro Conservative.
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#92