Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary has had 113 minutes of network news pre-election coverage, Bernie 10. [View all]AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)33. I am off to work now. Have a great day. Cheers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary has had 113 minutes of network news pre-election coverage, Bernie 10. [View all]
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
OP
Hillary has had 113 minutes of network news pre-election coverage, Bernie 10.
Tommy2Tone
Dec 2015
#3
Yet the 2 most covered, Clinton & Trump, are the front-runners. Coincidence? I think not.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#6
Even with Hillary's negative coverage -she surges in the polls compared to Sanders.
riversedge
Dec 2015
#12
Sure if covering her townhalls, speeches, rallies, and pressers is negative - which it is not.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#13
Well, I only watch the networks which were measured in the article--and until
riversedge
Dec 2015
#15
Her private server/email problem is a different issue than the Benghazi hearings.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#40
The wisdom of her *privatizing her email* IS DIFFERENT than focusing on the Bengazi part of it!
cascadiance
Dec 2015
#96
Much of the coverage of Hillary has been negative with a particular focus on the email nontroversy
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2015
#7
Not exactly. Her campaign coverage was 113 mins and other coverage was 117 mins (separate)
Turn CO Blue
Dec 2015
#42
Social media is an equal opportunity venue, the MSM has baked-in bias with selective coverage.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#16
Many people especially older people still get their news from the MSM. And the "news" they receive
think
Dec 2015
#24
They're covering Clinton's/Trump's townhalls, rallies, speeches, and pressers - a distinct advantage
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#11
That's because the congressional hearing was not included in the survey of election coverage.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#21
FFS, that's a ridiculous notion. It's the media's job to provide equitable campaign coverage.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#25
And I've corrected that notion by pointing out the MSM is covering her events in their entirety.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#37
It's all bullshit and fluff with the MSM. Feel-good coverage and contrived controversy.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#38
They are covering her events in their entirety. That's a distinct advantage.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#30
MSM= Misanthropic Sycophant Monsters who have the same boss as Hillary, the 1% .
orpupilofnature57
Dec 2015
#32
The data was obtained from the Tyndall Report for the WaPo article I posted. * Edited for video.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#70
Nonsense. Analyst Andrew Tyndall is respected in the industry of network data collection.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#78
Oh dear, so angry. Why are Clinton fans so angry? Worried about a 2008 faceplant redux?
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#85
It is bullshit and has strangled O'Malley's candidacy in the crib. Damn shame, really.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#72
The MSM are driving the narrative just like they did in 2007 promoting Giuliani v. Hillary 24/7.
AtomicKitten
Dec 2015
#71
Untrue. The networks have a biased agenda. The agenda is poorly disguised corporate propaganda.
Enthusiast
Dec 2015
#93
Funny how Democrats were united on how the Corp-Media was pro Conservative.
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#92