2016 Postmortem

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)

7. Much of the coverage of Hillary has been negative with a particular focus on the email nontroversy

Reply to AtomicKitten (Original post)

Thu Dec 10, 2015, 03:57 PM

Dec 2015

No coverage is better than negative coverage.

Bernie has benefited from the media.

He's getting almost no scrutiny.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

97 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary has had 113 minutes of network news pre-election coverage, Bernie 10. [View all] AtomicKitten Dec 2015 OP

Surprise, surprise, surprise HerbChestnut Dec 2015 #1

Ah the good old media UglyGreed Dec 2015 #2

C'mon they are all negative all the time. Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #4

You may be right I don't trust the people supporting Bernie lewebley3 Dec 2015 #35

Hillary has had 113 minutes of network news pre-election coverage, Bernie 10. Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #3

You know the old trope HerbChestnut Dec 2015 #5

Yet the 2 most covered, Clinton & Trump, are the front-runners. Coincidence? I think not. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #6

Even with Hillary's negative coverage -she surges in the polls compared to Sanders. riversedge Dec 2015 #12

Sure if covering her townhalls, speeches, rallies, and pressers is negative - which it is not. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #13

Well, I only watch the networks which were measured in the article--and until riversedge Dec 2015 #15

The MSM is even sponsoring events with Hillary. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #17

The Media covered Clinton's Congressional hearing and the SOS Email story. KittyWampus Dec 2015 #19

This is specifically election coverage and does not include the hearing. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #20

Bullshit. OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #39

Her private server/email problem is a different issue than the Benghazi hearings. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #40

No it's not. OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #44

Again, the hearing was not included in the survey of campaign coverage. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #47

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #90

Welcome to DU. OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #91

The wisdom of her *privatizing her email* IS DIFFERENT than focusing on the Bengazi part of it! cascadiance Dec 2015 #96

You can't compare Trump coverage with Hillary's Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #34

Much of the coverage of Hillary has been negative with a particular focus on the email nontroversy Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #7

Not exactly. Her campaign coverage was 113 mins and other coverage was 117 mins (separate) Turn CO Blue Dec 2015 #42

I thought the old media didn't matter anyway? Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #8

i believe that is true restorefreedom Dec 2015 #14

Social media is an equal opportunity venue, the MSM has baked-in bias with selective coverage. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #16

Many people especially older people still get their news from the MSM. And the "news" they receive think Dec 2015 #24

It's been obvious that the fix has been in. merrily Dec 2015 #9

They're covering Clinton's/Trump's townhalls, rallies, speeches, and pressers - a distinct advantage AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #11

No they aren't. OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #43

Reporting on but not broadcasting of the hearing. Got it? AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #49

The hearing was not broadcast on network news... OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #51

Give me te positive/negative coverage analysis, please Prixen Dec 2015 #10

What shallow reporting. The author ends it by mentioning "headline news" KittyWampus Dec 2015 #18

That's because the congressional hearing was not included in the survey of election coverage. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #21

Hillary's campaign message is considerably broader, which merits more coverage. oasis Dec 2015 #22

FFS, that's a ridiculous notion. It's the media's job to provide equitable campaign coverage. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #25

Fine, since you've already been informed that it was mostly.... MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #31

And I've corrected that notion by pointing out the MSM is covering her events in their entirety. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #37

Which is why the media doesn't talk about the real issues Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #36

It's all bullshit and fluff with the MSM. Feel-good coverage and contrived controversy. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #38

Useful idiots, Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #54

+1000 -- true and well-said! senz Dec 2015 #56

Hillary's campaign message is considerably broader Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #26

Incumbent! dpatbrown Dec 2015 #23

Well, 11 hours of that was one Benghazi panel. Plus commentary. pnwmom Dec 2015 #27

Again, the hearing was not included in the survey of campaign coverage. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #28

And that time was probably mostly negative... Agschmid Dec 2015 #29

They are covering her events in their entirety. That's a distinct advantage. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #30

MSM= Misanthropic Sycophant Monsters who have the same boss as Hillary, the 1% . orpupilofnature57 Dec 2015 #32

I am off to work now. Have a great day. Cheers. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #33

Is it OK Treant Dec 2015 #41

What is distasteful about the man? [n/t] Maedhros Dec 2015 #45

I'm sorry, Treant Dec 2015 #48

I think it's fair to say that one of this country's most glaring issues Maedhros Dec 2015 #57

And there it is. Treant Dec 2015 #63

Is it an insult to ignore you? Trajan Dec 2015 #61

No, it is not. Treant Dec 2015 #64

Oh the irony. neverforget Dec 2015 #79

I know you didn't ask me, but I'm a little afraid of him. MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #50

I found his temperament admirable. Maedhros Dec 2015 #58

Well, that's a difference between you and me. MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #59

Something like that. Treant Dec 2015 #65

Unfortunately, Treant Dec 2015 #66

I hope you hang in here, MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #69

He tells the truth, no profit in that. orpupilofnature57 Dec 2015 #62

Nah, it's just meme propagation. Maedhros Dec 2015 #67

It's a feature of the system. blackspade Dec 2015 #46

As in it's not a bug, it's a feature. You've got that right. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #73

The Hillary media coverage is overwhelmining negaitive, though. cheapdate Dec 2015 #52

Where is the category on talk show appearances? Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #53

Where is this report? OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #55

The data was obtained from the Tyndall Report for the WaPo article I posted. * Edited for video. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #70

That link leads to the home page of the so-called "Tyndall Report". OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #77

Nonsense. Analyst Andrew Tyndall is respected in the industry of network data collection. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #78

What findings? OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #80

FFS. Read the entire Washington Post article I linked to in my OP. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #81

Hilarious. OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #83

Oh dear, so angry. Why are Clinton fans so angry? Worried about a 2008 faceplant redux? AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #85

Angry? OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #88

Kicked and recommended! This is fucking horrible. Horribly unfair. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #60

It is bullshit and has strangled O'Malley's candidacy in the crib. Damn shame, really. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #72

Hello! It's called ratings Beaverhausen Dec 2015 #68

The MSM are driving the narrative just like they did in 2007 promoting Giuliani v. Hillary 24/7. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #71

Untrue. The networks have a biased agenda. The agenda is poorly disguised corporate propaganda. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #93

Are you surprised? Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #74

Blatant audacity. Breathtaking, really. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #75

Cynical, in my opinion. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #76

I see we're back to the "the media is unfair" complaints... brooklynite Dec 2015 #82

Being a BS supporter means redstateblues Dec 2015 #84

Media Quack Calls Meteorologist "Pornographer" for Reporting the Weather OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #86

"Gawker"? LOLOLOL. Great source, bucko! Are you for real?! LOL. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #87

Yes, Gawker. OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #89

Funny how Democrats were united on how the Corp-Media was pro Conservative. rhett o rick Dec 2015 #92

Right up until May 2015. Major Hogwash Dec 2015 #94

The fix is in. Scuba Dec 2015 #95

K&R demmiblue Dec 2015 #97