Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Will Pitt - of blessed memory - Nails it - Again. [View all]GoneOffShore
(17,342 posts)17. It's hardly superficial. It goes to the heart of Ms Clinton's personality and character
Or rather lack thereof.
As others have said, she is an opportunist.
That arrow on the logo? Points in any direction that she thinks will serve her interests and those of her paymasters.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You can "stand with Will Pitt" all you want, but I also listened to the whole statement...
Hekate
Nov 2015
#79
NObody has to twist anything to make that a negative, Hillary did it herself plain and simple
litlbilly
Nov 2015
#38
How does that answer Bernie's "How will hundreds of million in contributions from financial
Vincardog
Nov 2015
#15
She has been in the public eye her whole life. And not once has she done
Evergreen Emerald
Nov 2015
#16
How will hundreds of million in contributions from financial companies affect her regulation of them
Vincardog
Nov 2015
#21
Since the question gets crickets or hyperbolic responses; I have to vote uncomfortable as well.
Vincardog
Nov 2015
#36
It looks that way more every day, with every word uttered by the opposition.
Enthusiast
Nov 2015
#68
Wall Street liked her--and vice versa--before 911 as well. She tried to wrap it in 911, though.
merrily
Nov 2015
#27
Wall St liked her long before 9/11. They liked her A LOT, long before 9/11! So
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#63
I think you made a very important point when you said, " She was there rebuilding after 911. She was
rhett o rick
Nov 2015
#98
We have a chance to elect someone that doesn't have her terrible baggage. We have a chance to
rhett o rick
Nov 2015
#99
Really!! Blessed memory? Ha! I remember "POSUCS" and a lot of incoherent ranting.
MADem
Nov 2015
#102
It's hardly superficial. It goes to the heart of Ms Clinton's personality and character
GoneOffShore
Nov 2015
#17
Yep. Same here. I even wrote an article when that whole Fitzmas thing was going on that
stevenleser
Nov 2015
#62
Pitt and Leopold among others read it. I spoke to Pitt on the phone at the time.
stevenleser
Nov 2015
#105
We're on the same page. See Reply 27, which I just updated to reference your post.
merrily
Nov 2015
#33
He got tired of crap from years ago being repeated again and again and said goodbye
merrily
Nov 2015
#37
Yeah, they have lots of excuses for things. None of them hold water, but they have them.
stevenleser
Nov 2015
#106
Better to take a couple of days and think, rather than respond without doing so.
GoneOffShore
Nov 2015
#49
He is not using surrogates. He has not asked anyone to post his stuff here.
CaliforniaPeggy
Nov 2015
#64
Like so many others for whom people came to DU, helping to build it because what they wrote was
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#96
You were here in 2001? I don't remember all of anyone's posts. Don't remember
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#97