Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: STUDY: More Tweets More Votes! Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior! [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)102. Thanks again for kicking the thread. I tend to be different form most DUers who use the ignore
feature to disappear non constructive commentary. I believe in using everything, including non constructive drive bys to kick important threads. Seems to work for me.
Mmm, I just checked the FP. Looks like you have helped me to get two OPs on the FP. Wow, thanks, AGAIN!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
STUDY: More Tweets More Votes! Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior! [View all]
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
OP
Clearly those are not the people i am referring to. But thanks for weighing in anyhow ...
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#60
It would have been nice if you could have come up with your own unique term.
Sheepshank
Nov 2015
#17
Thanks for your support. Stalkers are creepy, my words, and documenting them is
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#43
You may flatter yourself if you wish. Nothing stopping you from doing so. Just don't mistake
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#72
Why is it that anytime someone responds to you with something you don't agree with...
George II
Nov 2015
#31
It's always alerted on. Documenting stalkers is necessary, glad to see juries understand
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#86
I guess they don't like Science. I thought that's what they wanted, but I guess
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#35
Yes, that has been obvious. But now all the cries for Science have been answered and we have
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#45
Actually no. Bernie beats Trump in online formats as well as traditional polls.
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#4
It's always been my philosophy to never ask a question you don't know the answer to
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#23
The anger over the online polls is unprecedented for some reason. I'm thinking
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#38
This reads and feels more like anti vax science. Untested, wishful thinking.
Sheepshank
Nov 2015
#71
Well we have the 2008 election to go by. And now another study apparently. Resisting progress
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#73
Well, we women are not capable of reading and understanding complex scientific studies of
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#56
"Well, we women are not capable of reading and understanding complex scientific studies"
zappaman
Nov 2015
#57
I don't think WYMCI missed anything! Beautiful response to another comment with
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#12
Lol, you ran right through that door that was opened wide, with perfect timing!
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#9
What do you have to say about the actual topic of this OP? You're in the thread, I assume you've
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#21
Well that's now what the study says. But hey, it's there for you to read or not.
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#40
The WIU Mock Election thread contained a link to other predictive models ...
1StrongBlackMan
Nov 2015
#51
In that case, Corrupt the Record will be "winning" the next debate for Hillary.
winter is coming
Nov 2015
#36
“I love Nancy Pelosi” vs. “Nancy Pelosi should be impeached” - bad news for Bernie?
ieoeja
Nov 2015
#61
I don't tweet about Hillary unless it's during a debate or to forward a link someone has posted
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#65
When the votes actually start getting counted, how long will it take the Bernie crew to start scream
tritsofme
Nov 2015
#66
How about we follow the example of the 'Benrie crew' and just deal with FACTS. Your
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#67
No, it doesn't. Why do you ask, did you see something IN the study that prompted that question
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#82
You didn't answer my questions. But then i never really expect actual discussion of issues from
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#87
If you want to join the non contributing factors here, that's your choice. The rest of us actually
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#96
Thanks again for kicking the thread. I tend to be different form most DUers who use the ignore
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#102
Take a bow. No matter how small, it is an accomplishment. Funny isn't it, how sometimes things
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#106