Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: STUDY: More Tweets More Votes! Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior! [View all]Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)75. did someone say that in this thread?
I haven't made my way through the whole thread yet, but i will be calling out anyone that said such a thing. Or are you making this up?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
STUDY: More Tweets More Votes! Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior! [View all]
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
OP
Clearly those are not the people i am referring to. But thanks for weighing in anyhow ...
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#60
It would have been nice if you could have come up with your own unique term.
Sheepshank
Nov 2015
#17
Thanks for your support. Stalkers are creepy, my words, and documenting them is
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#43
You may flatter yourself if you wish. Nothing stopping you from doing so. Just don't mistake
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#72
Why is it that anytime someone responds to you with something you don't agree with...
George II
Nov 2015
#31
It's always alerted on. Documenting stalkers is necessary, glad to see juries understand
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#86
I guess they don't like Science. I thought that's what they wanted, but I guess
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#35
Yes, that has been obvious. But now all the cries for Science have been answered and we have
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#45
Actually no. Bernie beats Trump in online formats as well as traditional polls.
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#4
It's always been my philosophy to never ask a question you don't know the answer to
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#23
The anger over the online polls is unprecedented for some reason. I'm thinking
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#38
This reads and feels more like anti vax science. Untested, wishful thinking.
Sheepshank
Nov 2015
#71
Well we have the 2008 election to go by. And now another study apparently. Resisting progress
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#73
Well, we women are not capable of reading and understanding complex scientific studies of
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#56
"Well, we women are not capable of reading and understanding complex scientific studies"
zappaman
Nov 2015
#57
I don't think WYMCI missed anything! Beautiful response to another comment with
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#12
Lol, you ran right through that door that was opened wide, with perfect timing!
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#9
What do you have to say about the actual topic of this OP? You're in the thread, I assume you've
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#21
Well that's now what the study says. But hey, it's there for you to read or not.
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#40
The WIU Mock Election thread contained a link to other predictive models ...
1StrongBlackMan
Nov 2015
#51
In that case, Corrupt the Record will be "winning" the next debate for Hillary.
winter is coming
Nov 2015
#36
“I love Nancy Pelosi” vs. “Nancy Pelosi should be impeached” - bad news for Bernie?
ieoeja
Nov 2015
#61
I don't tweet about Hillary unless it's during a debate or to forward a link someone has posted
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#65
When the votes actually start getting counted, how long will it take the Bernie crew to start scream
tritsofme
Nov 2015
#66
How about we follow the example of the 'Benrie crew' and just deal with FACTS. Your
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#67
No, it doesn't. Why do you ask, did you see something IN the study that prompted that question
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#82
You didn't answer my questions. But then i never really expect actual discussion of issues from
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#87
If you want to join the non contributing factors here, that's your choice. The rest of us actually
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#96
Thanks again for kicking the thread. I tend to be different form most DUers who use the ignore
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#102
Take a bow. No matter how small, it is an accomplishment. Funny isn't it, how sometimes things
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#106