Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The math is clear: Hillary Clinton has better odds of becoming president than anybody else — by far [View all]LonePirate
(13,446 posts)17. Then what about the 90%+ chance of losing faced by any other Dem candidate?
I'm not suggesting you should support Hillary. Rather, you should apply the reasoning equally to all candidates if you're going to use these numbers to advocate for or against a candidate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The math is clear: Hillary Clinton has better odds of becoming president than anybody else — by far [View all]
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
OP
You and anybody else can see I cited the quotes verbatim with the page they are on
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#59
There is nothing dishonest about my thread and I regret you felt the need to disrespect me.
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#66
I don't think we're at acceptance yet. Many more angry, divisive threads to come, I think.
randome
Oct 2015
#9
Well then, time to abandon my principles and vote for the corporatist most likely to win.
leftupnorth
Oct 2015
#7
To what extent do "people who participate in online betting markets" represent "likely voters"?
phantom power
Oct 2015
#11
He is ignoring a step in the process, a step the model takes into account
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#18
Again, the peer reviwed research suggests the best way to find out who will win is to actually...
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#43
Math is clear, but the electability odds variable is worthless. Here's the math that counts:
DrBulldog
Oct 2015
#34
I guess Jamie Dimon & the bankers will continue the parties at the White House!
dmosh42
Oct 2015
#39