Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
44. Pres. Obama appointed her to be chair in 2011, and he can replace her
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 04:56 PM
Oct 2015

if he wishes. The problem is that Debbie wants the job as a stepping stone in her political career, and she is playing hardball to keep it. She can redeem herself if HRC is elected President after being responsible for mismanaging support for DEMs in 2012 and 2014. Pres. Obama and V.P. Biden don't want to deal with the shit storm that she would cause if she were replaced. So, Pres. Obama is "satisfied" with her performance. My opinion is that no amount of letters to the President or Chair of NDC will cause any change. Debbie is in control and she has an agenda. Anyone getting in her way will be roadkill.

I just saw that on TV and I am so mad right now Peacetrain Oct 2015 #1
I hear you. But I suspect that tone-deaf DWS will not. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #2
let her office and the DNC know roguevalley Oct 2015 #8
The Chair of the DNC works for Pres. Obama. He apparently is satisfied. Writing to her NCjack Oct 2015 #16
Writing lets them know we're watching and not brain dead, which is a good thing, I guess. merrily Oct 2015 #33
The answer is Bernie! NCjack Oct 2015 #36
That's the fact, Jack! merrily Oct 2015 #41
LOL -- thanks. My daughter and I watched that movie just NCjack Oct 2015 #46
I am so glad to hear that she came home safe. merrily Oct 2015 #47
Actually, Obama is not satisfied and wanted to get rid of her in 2013. Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #38
Pres. Obama appointed her to be chair in 2011, and he can replace her NCjack Oct 2015 #44
I believe who heads the DNC is the call of the head of the Dem Party, who is the Dem POTUS. merrily Oct 2015 #49
I think there is a great misconception as to what powers the President has and doesn't have. rhett o rick Oct 2015 #59
DWS is an idiot Aerows Oct 2015 #22
After running for POTUS since 2006, etc., Hillary merrily Oct 2015 #51
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #3
People here were trying to say it wasn't true ibegurpard Oct 2015 #4
I saw those weird comments too -by Hilllary supporters- saw them BEFORE seeing Gabbard on MSNBC 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #6
Rep. Gabbard is massively impressive !!!! SamKnause Oct 2015 #5
That was my take too, on Gabbard. She's freaking awesome. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #7
I'm massively unimpressed with this ambitious person's self aggrandizing behavior, Hortensis Oct 2015 #9
It takes two to argue Fumesucker Oct 2015 #10
No. Don't be so easily manipulated. You guys didn't know Gabbard's Hortensis Oct 2015 #35
Don't be so easily manipulated? Ummm... o-kayyyyyyyy...? frylock Oct 2015 #39
gabbards is sticking up for we the people,as she should questionseverything Oct 2015 #42
Manipulate: Control or influence cleverly, unfairly, or unscrupulously. Hortensis Oct 2015 #45
no one needs to manipulate me into believing in the 1st amendment questionseverything Oct 2015 #48
Questionseverything, you forgot to question Gabbards. You know, Hortensis Oct 2015 #54
i do not need to question gabbards since she repeated what i have been saying for months now questionseverything Oct 2015 #55
A politician told you what you wanted to hear, and you didn't question why? Hortensis Oct 2015 #56
listen if you do not believe in freedom of speech that is up to you questionseverything Oct 2015 #57
Enjoy the debate, Everything. Hortensis Oct 2015 #58
Rachel Maddow featured her a year or two ago Timma Nov 2015 #62
Rachel has a way of doing that. A little searching on Hortensis Nov 2015 #63
Well, DWS chose the date & time to DIS-invite Rep. Gabbard, not the other way around. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #11
Some of us are the smart ones. jeff47 Oct 2015 #12
You forgot the "sarcasm" emoji. Because there's no way you can be serious. nt 7962 Oct 2015 #15
She has been vocal about her desire for more debates since the beginning of September... Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #18
Why didnt anyone believe it to start with? SOP for DWS nt 7962 Oct 2015 #13
I got caught unawares in a fire-storm of OUTRAGE! about how "this story has been debunked!!!" 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #17
Knee-jerkers. I saw no reason to doubt it from the start. 7962 Oct 2015 #26
DWS is like a spoiled high school girl Unknown Beatle Oct 2015 #14
This may be a common characteristic that HRC exudes to many of her followers Android3.14 Oct 2015 #19
Speaking of her facebook page pinebox Oct 2015 #21
wowzers questionseverything Oct 2015 #40
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service FBaggins Oct 2015 #24
One of the LAMEST alerts in the past few weeks. Even the 1 vote couldnt give a reason 7962 Oct 2015 #28
Sounds kind of outrageous. Aren't we supposed to be the "Democratic" Party Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #20
Wow. So fucking PETTY. AzDar Oct 2015 #23
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #25
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #27
Apparently, some big tents are larger than others. n/t winter is coming Oct 2015 #29
WELL, To Everyone Who Told Me I Was Lying Or It Was Just ChiciB1 Oct 2015 #30
Debbie Wasserman Schultz should resign. JDPriestly Oct 2015 #31
I'n sure neither Hillary nor Debbie had anything to do with this..... Indepatriot Oct 2015 #32
I really hope someone asks the candidates LiberalLovinLug Oct 2015 #34
I think she did mutter under here breath something 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #37
It's almost possible to smell the desperation coming from the DNC. GoneOffShore Oct 2015 #43
They are scared Hillary will fumble Aerows Oct 2015 #53
Hillary really seems to attract liars jfern Oct 2015 #50
Who? Never heard of her. moobu2 Oct 2015 #52
DWS is just another bad Obama appointment emsimon33 Oct 2015 #60
K&R in support (nt) Babel_17 Oct 2015 #61
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Tulsi Gabbard was in fact...»Reply #44