Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Dog Whistles- an Anti-Semitism Primer (a timely repost) [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)85. Yes, accusing him of being funded by Israel and questioning his loyalty is anti-Semitic.
And you know this because you once posted this about him:
treestar (58,727 posts)
257. Obama had his questioned
Ted Cruz had his questioned.
I could live with it. Just answer.
No they've made it a thing this question is not allowed. I do not want someone who puts Israel first in any office, let alone the Presidency. He could just answer that he is not claiming the dual citizenship and that the US comes first. Why play the victim over something that easy?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6814920
257. Obama had his questioned
Ted Cruz had his questioned.
I could live with it. Just answer.
No they've made it a thing this question is not allowed. I do not want someone who puts Israel first in any office, let alone the Presidency. He could just answer that he is not claiming the dual citizenship and that the US comes first. Why play the victim over something that easy?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6814920
And this:
treestar (58,728 posts)
276. You are simply reinforcing that we can't ask that question
and it should be of anyone right? Like Catholics in earlier eras thought of as putting the Pope first? My family could have been asked that.
I don't see why they could not just answer that the put the US and the constitution first. Why should anyone be unwilling to say that?
This is a "victimhood" very light compared to what other groups of people have put up with.
If you want to be POTUS, state clearly and unequivocally that the US is your first priority. That's not hard.
I don't know why this is made a thing except to intimidate people into supporting all things Israel wants. If you don't support propping Israel you are anti-Semitic. We already know that.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6814962
276. You are simply reinforcing that we can't ask that question
and it should be of anyone right? Like Catholics in earlier eras thought of as putting the Pope first? My family could have been asked that.
I don't see why they could not just answer that the put the US and the constitution first. Why should anyone be unwilling to say that?
This is a "victimhood" very light compared to what other groups of people have put up with.
If you want to be POTUS, state clearly and unequivocally that the US is your first priority. That's not hard.
I don't know why this is made a thing except to intimidate people into supporting all things Israel wants. If you don't support propping Israel you are anti-Semitic. We already know that.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6814962
And you accused Jewish people who were upset by this of playing the "victim" more than once:
treestar (58,728 posts)
273. Not particularly
as it was ridiculous. I don't think Obama would hesitate to answer the question. He would not play the victim. He released his birth certificate rather than complain. Oh how come Bernie is not asked to provide his birth certificate? Interesting.
So why can't anyone have their loyalty questioned? Just answer that you are American first. Or Franch or Polish or whatever. Do you agree with freedom of speech? I can put up with it - why can't Bernie the would-be POTUS?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6814947
273. Not particularly
as it was ridiculous. I don't think Obama would hesitate to answer the question. He would not play the victim. He released his birth certificate rather than complain. Oh how come Bernie is not asked to provide his birth certificate? Interesting.
So why can't anyone have their loyalty questioned? Just answer that you are American first. Or Franch or Polish or whatever. Do you agree with freedom of speech? I can put up with it - why can't Bernie the would-be POTUS?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6814947
treestar (58,729 posts)
265. And play the victim again.
No - those who insist we have to prop Israel due to our interests in the middle east, US evangelicals and whoever attempts to crush debate on the subject.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6814936
265. And play the victim again.
No - those who insist we have to prop Israel due to our interests in the middle east, US evangelicals and whoever attempts to crush debate on the subject.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6814936
OMG indeed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Apparently the 'mistake' is still being made. So no, I don't think it was a mistake, I think it
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#14
Well his Super Pac is apparently working in coordination with her Campaign. The sheer hypocrisy of
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#34
And none of those who denied it was anti-Semitic showed up this time either.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#44
So then you know why we're so upset that DUers are saying this about Bernie.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#33
That was one of the most disgusting ops I've seen since the primaries started.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#52
Two perfect examples of anti-semitism posted on DU, someone has to be in denial to not see that.
NealK
Sep 2015
#64
Like much of Shakespeare, it's become a chunk of our language independent of original context
Scootaloo
Sep 2015
#78
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Oh, but NPR is no longer respected.
Enthusiast
Sep 2015
#37
Not only is it a known anti-semitic trope, it comes up with distressing frequency.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2015
#66
Yes, accusing him of being funded by Israel and questioning his loyalty is anti-Semitic.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#85
The very idea that someone calls out anti-Semitism is offensive to some.
Behind the Aegis
Sep 2015
#88
More posts, more recs, only one denier - the only one who bothered to post here that is.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#89
Please explain why claiming he's being funded by Israel isn't anti-Semitic.
beam me up scottie
Sep 2015
#95
It has been my experience that the people, at least on DU, who love to toss these sorts of slanders
tritsofme
Oct 2015
#98
I used to refer to it as the silly season but I'm not laughing anymore.
beam me up scottie
Oct 2015
#103