Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

riversedge

(70,204 posts)
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:19 AM Sep 2015

Why Hillary Clinton Has the Best Track Record on Women's Issues [View all]

Last edited Thu Sep 3, 2015, 08:45 AM - Edit history (1)

So true. Thank you Hillary
"The best predictor of future performance is past performance, and when it comes to women's issues, the record is clear..."



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrea-dew-steele/why-hillary-clinton-has-t_b_8073982.html
Andrea Dew Steele

Why Hillary Clinton Has the Best Track Record on Women's Issues




Posted: 09/01/2015 7:04 pm EDT Updated: 09/01/2015 7:59 pm EDT



HILLARY CLINTON



"Women's rights are human rights."
This simple sentence declared by then-First Lady Hillary Clinton at the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 resonated around the world. Millions of women heard this as a declaration that they mattered, that their daughters mattered. The issue of women's rights and equality has persisted as the cornerstone of Hillary's political career. Over and over again, she has reinforced her famous speech with concrete actions -- as First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State -- fighting for women's rights domestically and internationally. Hillary Clinton's record on women's rights speaks for itself. While other candidates may have progressive proposals and ideas, I urge their supporters to cite tangible policy changes that have benefited women in this country and abroad.

If we are to honestly consider the issues that affect women and families, Hillary has consistently and passionately advocated for gender equality and family friendly policies. Throughout her time in the Senate, she championed gender equity legislation and used her status in the world to shine a light on issues of importance to women and girls.

In terms of family planning and reproductive rights, Hillary has unwaveringly supported a woman's right to choose and has fought for access to family planning resources that would empower women to make their own decisions about their bodies. Her historic refrain that abortions should be "safe, legal and rare" should be the mantra for all leaders who want to make sure birth control is easily accessible for all women. She has publicly condemned the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby ruling limiting birth control access for employees and strongly supports Planned Parenthood's work. Hillary has spoken in no uncertain terms in defense of Roe v. Wade, and sponsored legislation to reduce the number of abortions through access to birth control and sex education.

Globally, no candidate has done more for women's rights than Secretary Clinton. In her time as Secretary of State, she appointed the first-ever Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's Issues at the State Department; oversaw the creation of the U.S. National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security; and introduced the Global Health Initiative (GHI), investing $63 billion to help partner countries provide robust maternal and infant health services. Secretary Clinton has worked tirelessly to elevate women's rights as the key towards economic prosperity and global stability. Her public and private initiatives have appropriated millions of dollars towards providing secondary education to young girls around the world, and tackling the obstacles that face at-risk youths..................

..................

198 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not if you consider her opposition to same-sex marriage and support of banning late term abortions. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #1
Oh come on!!!!' VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #2
Clinton Seeking Shared Ground Over Abortions beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #3
Clinton votes against late term. Hillary Clinton Scolds US House for Banning Late-Term seabeyond Sep 2015 #52
Her EXACT WORDS: "I have said many times that I can support a ban on late-term abortions" beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #54
the only vote she voted nay.... went after repugs ass recently. seabeyond Sep 2015 #55
Because of the exception, she still supported the ban. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #66
the onyly vote... she voted NAY seabeyond Sep 2015 #68
But she said she supported banning late term abortions. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #70
she voted NAY against ban on late term abortions seabeyond Sep 2015 #71
That doesn't contradict what I posted. She still supported banning late term abortions. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #73
2003 she voted NAY on ban on late term abortions. seabeyond Sep 2015 #75
That's good. Now how does that prove I was wrong when I said she supported banning them? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #76
2003 she vote nay on late term abortion seabeyond Sep 2015 #77
How does that prove I was wrong? Answer that and we'll be done. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #78
her bottom line has ALWAYS been saying NAY to a ban on late term abortion. whether you are done or seabeyond Sep 2015 #80
Okay so you admit I was right. Good. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #83
Actions speak louder than words.. VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #100
Why? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #101
Sicks and syones may break my bones VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #104
Bingo. earthside Sep 2015 #107
What's my "identity"? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #108
Are you female? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #115
Where did I tell anyone what to believe? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #116
You did it earlier this week VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #119
Did I? I don't remember telling anyone what to believe. Got a link? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #120
Yes you did VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #123
??? Where's the link where I told someone what to believe? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #124
So did you disagree with it them VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #127
LOL! Disagree with what? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #128
Not your strong suit VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #130
Reading your mind? I don't think it anyone's strong suit. Or anyone's wish. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #133
Yes....in this case it really does... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #109
Who's a white hetero male? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #110
Are you female? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #112
Why would that matter? Would it change the facts I posted? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #114
It matters big time VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #117
Yes. I definitely think women can speak for themselves. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #118
And ACT for themselves VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #121
Oh, definitely. Too "buddy". Whatever that means. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #122
Dont fiegn ignorance VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #125
I have no idea what you're on about. Perhaps you should be more clear. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #126
You know exactly what I am talking about VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #129
My peers are men? Really? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #131
It proves disingenousness VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #98
How is posting facts disingenuous? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #99
Because actions speak louder than words... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #102
You keep using that word... beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #103
No I do nott think you know the difference VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #105
Why? Men can't post facts? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #106
What "facts"? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #111
Here: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #113
words... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #132
Words "I have said many times that I can support a ban on late-term abortions" beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #135
"Can" being the operative word here VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #137
Where do you see "male telling females about thier lady parts.."? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #138
... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #140
Why can't you answer? You mean the men I work with are my peers? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #142
Words VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #143
How does that disprove her own words here: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #145
Because... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #150
That's exactly what I posted! VERY GOOD! *bmus claps* beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #152
Except you denied she said "can" VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #157
Where did I deny she said "can"? I posted the same quote. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #158
You just did upthread, VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #161
Where? Post# or link. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #162
Where you tried to also creatively VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #165
Where did I edit anything?: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #166
But didnt.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #167
What did I say her words meant "when they were made...."? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #169
I have no idea WTF you are trying to say.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #172
You tell me what I said that was false and what I "edited". beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #173
Perhaps, you tell me why you keep posting her words VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #174
Because you said I was being disingenuous and editing her words. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #175
And perhaps you are reading something into them VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #178
How is posting her own words taking them out of context? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #179
By posting her actions VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #181
Keep digging! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #183
I am not the one peddling VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #186
Yeah, you kind of are. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #187
No actually I am not VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #188
And that proves that what I posted was false and/or edited? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #189
It proves you are the one peddling feces.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #190
How? Which post(s) exactly was it peddled in? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #191
All of them in this discussion apparently... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #192
So that proves the quote I posted was false and/or edited how? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #193
Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #144
BUSTED! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #146
it was a childish game. seabeyond Sep 2015 #149
She started it. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #151
asking a question? no questions allowed. that is starting something, in your book. done. again. seabeyond Sep 2015 #154
Bye! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #155
I am not the one tat VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #153
I posted facts, you argued, then you posted the same facts. But I think I know better? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #156
I posted the fact that she said "can"...which VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #159
What post did I deny that in? Link? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #160
Yes she supported banning late term abortions Autumn Sep 2015 #194
Thank you. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #195
Ah BMUS. You are a better woman than I Autumn Sep 2015 #196
"Can" is very different than would VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #134
Can: be able to/be permitted to or iow would beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #136
Definition VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #139
She didn't say "I have said many times that I CAN support a ban on late-term abortions"? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #141
Oh really? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #147
I'm not arguing, I'm posting her own words. You don't seem to like them. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #148
But fox newsified it by "creatively" editting VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #163
I posted the exact quote from ontheissues. What part did I edit? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #164
So then WTF point were you trying to make? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #168
I posted her own words to prove she supported a ban on late term abortions. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #171
No by your own definition in fact VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #176
Prove it. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #180
She voted no... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #184
That proves she never said she supported a ban? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #185
Hillary on the sanctity of marriage: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #5
Bernie on "What Women Want." MADem Sep 2015 #7
"old shit"? Hillary didn't support marriage equality until 2013. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #8
Hillary never once suggested any of the stuff Sanders suggested in his little opus. MADem Sep 2015 #10
Unlike Bernie she opposed equal rights for lgbt people and wanted to ban late term abortions. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #12
No--this is sick, sad and hilarious--all at once. MADem Sep 2015 #22
Why are you so obsessed with that essay? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #23
Why are you so obsessed with old positions that HRC does not hold? MADem Sep 2015 #26
And like I said neither 2013 or 2000 is ancient history. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #27
If her position has changed, and it is clear it has changed, your only purpose is to throw shade. MADem Sep 2015 #28
Citing her civil rights record is not "misrepresenting" her position. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #30
Well, then "citing" Sanders views on male-female relationships, and his view of women as "dependent" MADem Sep 2015 #32
Old material - she only started supporting marriage equality 2 years ago: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #34
Your frantic gish gallop doesn't change the fact that you've misrepresented her current views. MADem Sep 2015 #36
Where did I misrepresent them? Point it out. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #37
You started in post one, and you kept on going from there. MADem Sep 2015 #40
Where? Post the exact words where I misrepresented her "current stance on issues". beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #41
You can read as well as the next person. MADem Sep 2015 #42
Exact quote "I can't trust someone who NEEDED TO EVOLVE on civil rights to support mine." beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #43
No, it's not as clear as you want to pretend it is, now. MADem Sep 2015 #44
Really? Which one of these statements left her current positions unclear: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #46
You focus on her past positions and fail to articulate her current ones. MADem Sep 2015 #48
"Hillary Has the Best Track Record on Women's Issues" means her PAST RECORD matters. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #50
Keep posting those rape fantasies and ignoring her record. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #59
You are hyper-replying so I'll leave you to it. One answer is sufficient. MADem Sep 2015 #82
Because I said that's what right wing nut jobs do, focus on sex instead of issues? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #86
It's not a gish gallop. BMUS is sticking to one subject. Scootaloo Sep 2015 #95
Nope because he never tried to restrict anyone's rights. She did. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #63
Are you seriously saying we did not use to have laws that made women dependant? ieoeja Sep 2015 #170
Not sure how you made THAT leap, but thanks for playing. MADem Sep 2015 #197
she opposed marriage equality, as did sanders until 2009. staying QUIET on the issue si NOT support seabeyond Sep 2015 #57
Bernie voted against DOMA in 1996. That vote WAS him supporting marriage equality. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #62
as you have been told repeatedly, was not voting to protect marriage equality. sanders stayed quiet seabeyond Sep 2015 #64
WHEN did he stay quiet? What interview? You keep saying that but you never post proof. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #65
thru out his career until 2009 when he first stood up for marriage equality. seabeyond Sep 2015 #67
That's your word, it's not proof. Try again. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #69
ONE time sanders used the words, marriage equality before 2009. silence does not equal support seabeyond Sep 2015 #72
He voted against DOMA, that means he voiced his support of marriage equality. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #74
sanders stayed silent, certainly did not mention marriage equality. those who spoke voted against seabeyond Sep 2015 #79
LOL! That's your proof? An interview that never happened? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #81
yes. i have made the point repeatedly. silence is not support. you got it. seabeyond Sep 2015 #85
So not saying something = saying something? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #89
"So not saying something = saying something?" i would think this would be an obvious answer for you seabeyond Sep 2015 #91
So Hillary does support barbecuing puppies. Wow. That's awful. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #92
Late term abortion only votes count. Marriage equality only words count. ieoeja Sep 2015 #177
Exactly. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #182
They have to go back into the archives to find anything to gripe about.... MADem Sep 2015 #6
Many wanted to know what she did as S of STATE. The op has some of her accomplishments. riversedge Sep 2015 #88
Yes. MADem Sep 2015 #90
Really...You Laugh Off Lesbian Identified Women? billhicks76 Sep 2015 #13
I see u mentioned Bernie. I have an idea Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #17
Because one has been right all along. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #18
You don't give her any credit at all--you keep repeating her old positions, and then get mad MADem Sep 2015 #29
The title of the op is "Why Hillary Clinton Has the Best Track Record on Women's Issues" beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #31
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it doesn't matter. MADem Sep 2015 #33
An old essay doesn't equal not supporting civil rights. But this 40 year old letter matters too: beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #35
An old essay with some sick views on male-female dynamics, that the author has called dumb, stupid MADem Sep 2015 #38
Where did I "mischaracterize Clinton's current views"? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #39
........... MADem Sep 2015 #45
Exact quote "I can't trust someone who NEEDED TO EVOLVE on civil rights to support mine." beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #47
I can direct you to the post where I slapped down that excuse, too. MADem Sep 2015 #49
Point out where I "misrepresented her current views". beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #51
For the third time, post one, and every post thereafter where MADem Sep 2015 #53
"Let's abolish all laws dealing with abortion, drugs, sexual behavior (adultery, homosexuality, etc) beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #56
So? That's not the point. The point is you misrepresented Secstate Clinton's MADem Sep 2015 #93
I posted evidence of her past record of opposition to civil rights because that IS the point. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #94
Hillary has been bad on SSM jfern Sep 2015 #4
I think it was a difference in approach more than anything else. MADem Sep 2015 #9
All of the states that got SSM for a while before jfern Sep 2015 #19
I agree--but the impetus came from the states, it wasn't "federal decree" that was MADem Sep 2015 #21
Without the feds, only 15-18 states would have SSM jfern Sep 2015 #24
Of course the feds are relevant, but it's not like the states were handed something without MADem Sep 2015 #25
Yes, Hillary has the Best Record on Women's Issues. Cha Sep 2015 #11
I Guess If You Don't Consider Iraqi Women Actual Women billhicks76 Sep 2015 #14
same with sanders, i guess if you do not consider Kosovo or Palestinian women? seabeyond Sep 2015 #58
LOL @ Kosovo. nt Romulox Sep 2015 #87
Oh DO tell us of Clinton's stellar record of standing up for Palestine, Seabeyond. n/t Scootaloo Sep 2015 #96
MOAB's reddread Sep 2015 #61
"We came. We say. He died." Proud of turning Libya into a chaotic shithole eridani Sep 2015 #15
got a list and she's checking it twice reddread Sep 2015 #84
She would make a great Secretary of Health and Human Services provided Congress is JDPriestly Sep 2015 #16
Or Supreme Court justice. That would totally insulate her from the problem of testing the winds== eridani Sep 2015 #198
with rape used as off-the-clock punishment by Honduran police MisterP Sep 2015 #20
same holds true with anyone who takes on these responsibilities. what? obama a misogynist? seabeyond Sep 2015 #60
is that an algorithm? reddread Sep 2015 #97
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Hillary Clinton Has t...»Reply #0