Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
The attacks on Hillary will NEVER stop. And as we can now see, those who oppose her randys1 Aug 2015 #1
Then she needs to be able to deal with them, and she can't. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #72
EXACTLY what all the rightwingers are telling me on the internet, EXACTLY what you just randys1 Aug 2015 #73
I bet they also say that water is wet and the sky is blue. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #84
Lots of those opponents here at DU, I wish they would go to a place where rightwing talk randys1 Aug 2015 #85
Truth should be accepted anywhere Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #89
What truth am I rejecting? The truth according to who? randys1 Aug 2015 #91
That she needs to be able to deal with the attacks, Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #95
And yet she's far ahead of Sanders. That is truth. Deal with it. George II Aug 2015 #101
A little less every day.... every day.... every day.... Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #104
to you and your cohorts all criticism of Hillary is right wing cali Aug 2015 #90
So if someone doesn't feel the way that YOU virgogal Aug 2015 #94
I thoroughly expect rightwingers to hate and attack Hillary, I wont take that away from them randys1 Aug 2015 #98
there is nothing remotely hateful in my op cali Aug 2015 #206
The RW has no messageboards at all like DU, not a single one. RW has never invited open discussions. Sunlei Aug 2015 #108
NOt on most explicit rw boards, I do know one where nobody is banned for any reason randys1 Aug 2015 #110
Unlike DU, They're probaby afraid to ban anyone who pays by the month. Sunlei Aug 2015 #132
Listening to caller after caller into all the shows today about Hillary and email randys1 Aug 2015 #134
IMO, if after RW raked over decades of Mrs. Clintons work and all they have is an old school email s Sunlei Aug 2015 #137
He is next on the list, i am sure randys1 Aug 2015 #139
Really? George II Aug 2015 #122
really. Sunlei Aug 2015 #129
Seems like you don't like 840high Aug 2015 #169
prove it. post some comments from wingnuts saying that cali Aug 2015 #120
Well, she's ahead of Sanders by 2-1 or more in every state but one. .. George II Aug 2015 #93
First of all, it is way to soon to lean on those. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #102
Two points: George II Aug 2015 #167
You are averaging in old polls which are no longer correct. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #191
Well then, if you look at the last four polls listed on Pollster, Sanders appears..... George II Aug 2015 #192
No. nt MannyGoldstein Aug 2015 #183
Yes. nt George II Aug 2015 #193
What bugs ME is the willingness of people to use JUDICIAL WATCH horse shit on a Democratic message MADem Aug 2015 #82
blabitty bla bla bla.... get back to me when you got something new to groan about. boston bean Aug 2015 #2
you can stick your fingers in your ears and chant "I can't hear you" cali Aug 2015 #5
And you can say the same thing over and over, doesn't make what I said untrue. boston bean Aug 2015 #7
it's hardly just me saying it. cali Aug 2015 #11
Right it isn't just you, it's the entire GOP chorus along with you! boston bean Aug 2015 #12
it's scores of liberal pundits, elected dems and rank and file dems as well. cali Aug 2015 #19
Yeah, right! you keep saying that. boston bean Aug 2015 #44
It will depend on her GOP opponent whether he wins or not Armstead Aug 2015 #28
The email situation is of her own making. It's not a smear, it's a fact. Her sloppy handling Autumn Aug 2015 #123
Everyone's got an "opinion", some opinions are just conspiracy theories. boston bean Aug 2015 #196
No, people are voicing their concern over Autumn Aug 2015 #198
Just so happens all them "concerns" are the same as what Right Wingers fling at the wall. boston bean Aug 2015 #199
I hear those concerns from a lot of Democrats so OK. Of course they don't Autumn Aug 2015 #200
just cause you hear them from "Democrats" doesn't mean boston bean Aug 2015 #201
Unless one of her staff personally supervised the the "wiping" of the server, what was to jonno99 Aug 2015 #3
Even if they supervised that, what (other than professionalism) would have prevented them from doing karynnj Aug 2015 #25
so you choose to reward rw hate attack for your benefit, for your candidate. it never stops. seabeyond Aug 2015 #4
sorry, this has nothing to do with my support for Bernie. I've been opposed to hillary cali Aug 2015 #9
your bottom line is tear her down thru rw hate, rewarding their agenda. seabeyond Aug 2015 #10
fail seabey. I use liberal sources. cali Aug 2015 #21
liberal media? .... no agenda there, liberal sources for rw attack. i see no clarifications seabeyond Aug 2015 #23
that doesn't make any sense. cali Aug 2015 #29
Why not address the actual criticisms of her handling of the emails Vattel Aug 2015 #150
Supporters are blind kcjohn1 Aug 2015 #6
i am not a supporter, nor blind. please do not insult people simply because they disagree with you seabeyond Aug 2015 #13
No insults kcjohn1 Aug 2015 #36
calling people "blind" for disagreeing with you is not an insult? seabeyond Aug 2015 #38
There is different kcjohn1 Aug 2015 #42
TO hide Benghazi details, right! Wait, am I being punked, this is NOT randys1 Aug 2015 #75
You won't get an answer. 840high Aug 2015 #170
the fury born of denial is pretty interesting. cali Aug 2015 #30
"fury" i see not an ounce of fury. but, that is part of the game played. assign emotion, then insult seabeyond Aug 2015 #39
you are expressing fury. cali Aug 2015 #50
no. i am not. you persume to dictate peoples feelings over the net and expect to be taken seriously? seabeyond Aug 2015 #54
Sorry, but it most certainly IS the RW scandal machine making this into more than it is. blm Aug 2015 #8
you are flat out wrong. it is an issue cali Aug 2015 #17
For as many Democrats that you claim (and quote) that its an issue, there are five times as many.... George II Aug 2015 #27
of course most dems are going to close ranks behind her cali Aug 2015 #57
Of course. ... George II Aug 2015 #78
I think her viability is vanishing cali Aug 2015 #119
You're entitled to your opinion. I just hope that damage caused by you and others doesn't destroy.. George II Aug 2015 #131
it's the height of absurdity cali Aug 2015 #133
Get real - do you really think 840high Aug 2015 #171
+1000 sheshe2 Aug 2015 #159
IT is ONLY an issue if the media and the anti Clinton campaign, alive and well here at DU randys1 Aug 2015 #80
LOL - Horsepoo - Dems 'privately' express a lot of concern against Obama, Kerry, ACA, IRS, blm Aug 2015 #68
whatever. rave nonsensically on o your heart's content cali Aug 2015 #76
I'm not as easily entertained by RW propaganda as you. blm Aug 2015 #92
silly attempt at a smear by you. I don't do rw propaganda. I do facts cali Aug 2015 #124
I agree with Cali 100% in this OP and am impressed how clearly she articulated why it is a problem karynnj Aug 2015 #37
thanks,karynn cali Aug 2015 #51
I get that, but, who can claim that when she was taking the similar path as GOP SoS blm Aug 2015 #62
Correct. 840high Aug 2015 #172
Republicans are Hypocrits, we should not be Rilgin Aug 2015 #55
Laugh, laugh, I thought I'd cry. blm Aug 2015 #65
Turn it on yourself Rilgin Aug 2015 #69
Nope - I'm saying what I said. Neither Powell or Rice would even be asked and when it is known blm Aug 2015 #74
neither are running for president. neither had their own server. cali Aug 2015 #79
Yeah - If only HRC used the DNC's server, instead, THEN the corporate media would be OK blm Aug 2015 #86
Can you make a single argument other than Rilgin Aug 2015 #100
Then use your energy to DEMAND it across the board. blm Aug 2015 #106
No Rilgin Aug 2015 #116
LOL - No one here thinks that Dem politicians can be allowed to be AS bad. YOU want that blm Aug 2015 #117
flail, flail an more flail. cali Aug 2015 #126
You're welcome to show that ANY real DUer said Dems are allowed to be AS bad as GOPs. blm Aug 2015 #135
Again Rilgin Aug 2015 #140
^^ THIS ^^ jonno99 Aug 2015 #66
Demand ALL of DC turn over every email waylaid. ALL - or should it ONLY be these emails blm Aug 2015 #71
Well, don't you think that when one becomes a public servant that THAT (FOI requests) is to be jonno99 Aug 2015 #77
my understanding is that FOIA is to be followed, period HFRN Aug 2015 #87
Demand it of EVERY ONE OF THEM. Or, are you in harmony with the RW propaganda machine blm Aug 2015 #88
Why is this so hard to comprehend? YES! demand it of every one of them and the jonno99 Aug 2015 #97
Where is YOUR energy directed? Making the RW propagandists' load easier. blm Aug 2015 #103
"CorpMedia has its hooks" - no doubt. But it begs the question: why does the campaign jonno99 Aug 2015 #111
Come clean with what? With the horsesh!t narrative being catapulted? blm Aug 2015 #115
Yes - furthermore I don't 840high Aug 2015 #174
...+1 840high Aug 2015 #173
Well, she was one of a number of high-ranking people with private accounts back then, and Hortensis Aug 2015 #14
Well look at that a concerned Bernie supporter is very concerned saturnsring Aug 2015 #15
Did you ever think that it's a concerned Dem supporter.? 840high Aug 2015 #175
LOL! This is only an issue because you won't stop talking about it. randome Aug 2015 #16
wow. that's some potent denial you have going on cali Aug 2015 #18
So tell me what bad thing happened because of this. randome Aug 2015 #41
I'll answer my own request. Nothing. randome Aug 2015 #46
this mess is the bad thing. cali Aug 2015 #127
So nothing bad happened that you can point to. randome Aug 2015 #195
that her favorabilities are disastrous is a bad thing. she is the odds on favorite to cali Aug 2015 #197
This server thing is the most important issue this country faces!!!!!! JoePhilly Aug 2015 #32
You must live a sheltered 840high Aug 2015 #176
So was Benghazi. Sorry, I meant to say BENGHAZI! randome Aug 2015 #194
It's all about the perception of the voters. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #20
that's true, but I stand by what I wrote in the op cali Aug 2015 #24
I agree with your OP. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #34
"Less-than-honest-husband"? Is that you Mr. Starr? George II Aug 2015 #31
No, that's me who thinks Bill is less than honest. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #33
Trashing Bill... sheshe2 Aug 2015 #161
You never miss a chance to take a gratuitous (and unworthy) shot at Hillary Clinton, do you? George II Aug 2015 #22
how about actually addressing the specifics in the op? cali Aug 2015 #26
You nor anyone else has one lick of proof that Hillary boston bean Aug 2015 #35
no proof but there's evidence as posted in the op and there's common sense, critical cali Aug 2015 #47
There is no proof. Yet, you want to continually try to turn it into the worst, human failure, that boston bean Aug 2015 #49
Great post. Couldn't have said it better. Kingofalldems Aug 2015 #53
No - Occam's razor is about arriving at the simplest answer. So - what is the question? jonno99 Aug 2015 #70
. boston bean Aug 2015 #96
Proclaims the ostrich... jonno99 Aug 2015 #99
... sheshe2 Aug 2015 #163
At some point we have to just accept that the GOP is everywhere. randys1 Aug 2015 #81
OMG, this is sheshe2 Aug 2015 #162
I like cali's OP - sorry you don't. 840high Aug 2015 #177
Exactly, and as they say, innocent until PROVEN guilty.... George II Aug 2015 #130
Because they're just right wing talking points, and you just revel in the "scandal". George II Aug 2015 #128
I have to wonder why that is? sheshe2 Aug 2015 #164
I am a Hillary leaner - and I must agree with you - she got some darned awful advice . . . if she DrDan Aug 2015 #40
I am far from tech savvy, but I just don't get not separating work cali Aug 2015 #45
I can only speak for the two corporations I worked for . . . but there DrDan Aug 2015 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Aug 2015 #109
don't buy it DrDan Aug 2015 #144
Mixing work and personal is common, but dreamnightwind Aug 2015 #142
I think she should give a speech to explain it to the public HFRN Aug 2015 #43
In case you were curious. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #56
Looks like Juror 6 got it right . TheFarS1de Aug 2015 #121
How'd you know I was #6? Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #125
I'm not going to rag on Hillary too much about this yet, Blue_In_AK Aug 2015 #48
I'd forgotten about that. cali Aug 2015 #59
We have long memories up here Blue_In_AK Aug 2015 #61
Thanks for the reminder. 840high Aug 2015 #178
My thoughrs on the matter GitRDun Aug 2015 #52
i know little to nothing about puters. my question. all the people sending her work emails knew seabeyond Aug 2015 #58
actually an excellent thought. 100s, maybe 1000s of people who knew and said nothing. Sunlei Aug 2015 #113
Someone directed kcjohn1 Aug 2015 #60
Yes, I'd like to know whose idea it was! xynthee Aug 2015 #67
Perhaps Powell and Rice during the transition process? Why won't RW media ask them blm Aug 2015 #118
I understand the sentiment GitRDun Aug 2015 #143
Assuming it will go away is a mistake musiclawyer Aug 2015 #64
It won't go away. Wait till 840high Aug 2015 #179
? Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #83
lol ok GitRDun Aug 2015 #141
The lack of oversight is the problem here. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #147
You are talking about optics GitRDun Aug 2015 #149
I am talking about judgement. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #160
Now you are moving on to other subjects where you disagree with her GitRDun Aug 2015 #168
You can bet that some classified information was mishandled. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #190
I hear ya GitRDun Aug 2015 #207
I used to work in offices. I never accessed private e-mails in the office. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #105
I assume you'd never vote for her, even if she wins the primary. Sunlei Aug 2015 #107
you assume incorrectly. cali Aug 2015 #112
'of course' I do! Sunlei Aug 2015 #114
Blah, blah, blah. leftofcool Aug 2015 #136
denial, denial and more denial cali Aug 2015 #138
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Aug 2015 #145
The classified stuff is the real problem, tho The Traveler Aug 2015 #146
I recently deleted 5000 emails from my personal account. Lancero Aug 2015 #148
so you're a high ranking government official with one account for both your personal cali Aug 2015 #151
No. Lancero Aug 2015 #152
try responding to what is in the op. it has nothing to do with right wing bullshit cali Aug 2015 #154
Seems to mention the fauxian scandal quite a lot... Lancero Aug 2015 #155
Hillary screwed up but hay rick Aug 2015 #153
The media's been blowing it out of proportion ever since it hit. Lancero Aug 2015 #156
What does your company think about you mixing their business and yours on that account? Fumesucker Aug 2015 #157
Depends - What do you think about the embrace of a RW fauxian scandal? Lancero Aug 2015 #158
Silly answer. 840high Aug 2015 #181
In otherwords, you think it's great that Democrats are falling for Republican hoaxes. Lancero Aug 2015 #184
I think it's great that 840high Aug 2015 #186
You running for president? 840high Aug 2015 #180
Nope, but apparently large portions of DU think deleting personal emails is tantamount to murder. Lancero Aug 2015 #185
The mess is of his own creation. It reflects badly on his judgment riversedge Aug 2015 #165
You really are a one trick pony, aren't you. philosslayer Aug 2015 #166
not even close. but if it makes you feel better cali Aug 2015 #187
SoS working from a private email account MannyGoldstein Aug 2015 #182
If this is the craziest thing you've ever heard of, you've lived a very sheltered life. randome Aug 2015 #188
The email thing really doesn't bother me too much. What does bother me-- eridani Aug 2015 #189
She made a dumb mistake, at the very least. nt Zorra Aug 2015 #202
I suspect that many of her unforced errors stem from being gun shy because of the tblue37 Aug 2015 #203
It's obvious that what really bugs you about it is that there is no substance to it. DanTex Aug 2015 #204
huh? no. what troubles me is that it reveals that Clinton has no problem lying cali Aug 2015 #205
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»it's not the classified s...»Reply #43