2016 Postmortem

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

8. "Looks like Hillary is a chicken"

Wed Aug 19, 2015, 11:31 AM

Aug 2015

This is some childish bullshit and highly sexist. No one in their right mind could refer to her as a chicken. Pure sexist bullshit that would not be thrown at her if she was a man.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

321 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DNC shields Hillary Clinton from debate stage [View all] L0oniX Aug 2015 OP

happy to be the first k and r! nt restorefreedom Aug 2015 #1

Showing Clinton=Bush billhicks76 Aug 2015 #133

ooops restorefreedom Aug 2015 #196

I Was Just Agreeing billhicks76 Aug 2015 #253

aahhhh, ok. am a bit restorefreedom Aug 2015 #259

I think her campaign must be in disarray... CoffeeCat Aug 2015 #297

we should not criticise the nominee, actual or presumptive HFRN Aug 2015 #2

LOL azmom Aug 2015 #3

Yea ok let's just have the DNC select our candidate. We want the people to win. L0oniX Aug 2015 #4

Unless it isn't Hillary AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #130

Fuck your party! pocoloco Aug 2015 #134

Since you vulgarly and rudely refer to "your party", what Party are you? This is Democratic Underground. No (R)..... Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #144

C'mon, Fred... gregcrawford Aug 2015 #190

This is a board for Democrats. murielm99 Aug 2015 #191

You should be more careful with snide innuendoes, Muriel... gregcrawford Aug 2015 #202

There was no innuendo. murielm99 Aug 2015 #262

"a board for Democratic Party members" BeanMusical Aug 2015 #269

Do you mean the new DU? murielm99 Aug 2015 #274

The one overrun by people who like to mass alert and tear down anyone but Bernie? AlbertCat Aug 2015 #300

You've been blocked okasha Aug 2015 #305

AA, Hillary, Interfaith and Prayer Circle, AlbertCat Aug 2015 #316

You so completley misunderstood my comments... gregcrawford Aug 2015 #288

Technically, yes, but if Democrats ozone_man Aug 2015 #251

Technically nothing. murielm99 Aug 2015 #263

Then stop supporting Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #278

Goodbye, murielm99 Aug 2015 #279

Good luck in your support for Hillary. Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #287

wrong - it is a board for those voting for Democrats DrDan Aug 2015 #289

+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #294

This post got alerted... Qutzupalotl Aug 2015 #192

Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #136

Anne Coulter or Kristen Powers could not have said it better! Am I right? "Hahaha"...is on that level. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #147

??? billhicks76 Aug 2015 #160

What he means is ... Trajan Aug 2015 #205

Id Claim Strange Bedfellows But... billhicks76 Aug 2015 #255

Thank...my last laugh before sleep. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #261

Bam, you nailed it! arlington.mass Aug 2015 #247

Hillary is the presumptive nominee? Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #208

The party is being hurt by the oligarch control of the Party Elites. It's do or die, literally rhett o rick Aug 2015 #268

it's kind of amazing, how many took my post literally HFRN Aug 2015 #290

We should constructively criticize the party's candidates. That's what helps us win elections. Scuba Aug 2015 #5

The people need to see and hear many debates to make a more informed decision. L0oniX Aug 2015 #7

If that were true polls would move based on debate performance MaggieD Aug 2015 #12

Ah so your solution is to have no debates. Got it. Maybe the DNC will hire you as an unpaid intern. L0oniX Aug 2015 #22

As I said, 6 is plenty MaggieD Aug 2015 #25

4, not 6. jeff47 Aug 2015 #39

If Hillary performs poorly in the early debates ... aggiesal Aug 2015 #198

The nomination will be all but clinched by Super Tuesday. I just hope Sanders concedes graciously. George II Aug 2015 #311

27 Democratic primary debates in 2008 but 6 is plenty for you. L0oniX Aug 2015 #42

I doubt that many people watched murielm99 Aug 2015 #105

Overexposure hurts Hillary, that's for sure. John Poet Aug 2015 #131

Hillary has been in the public eye ... NanceGreggs Aug 2015 #228

The latest polls say so... John Poet Aug 2015 #273

Like it or lump it, my friend ... NanceGreggs Aug 2015 #302

".. but given her history, and the fact that she's still standing after decades of battling the Cha Aug 2015 #277

Her corporate donors... Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #280

It is illegal ... NanceGreggs Aug 2015 #304

And notice that, okasha Aug 2015 #306

"Hillary has as much right to run for office as anyone else" Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #313

" to donate directly " - what a sad response given the post Citizens United reality. Warren Stupidity Aug 2015 #314

No, most folks don't have the time... blackspade Aug 2015 #244

it's outrageous any way you slice it. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #119

Solution for those who want 6: Watch 6. HappyPlace Aug 2015 #231

In 2004, my support for Kerry and Edwards was based on their debate performance. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #124

6 debates is plenty MaggieD Aug 2015 #126

I would have at least 8-10. Probalby 8. Six is far too few. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #201

A dozen would be nice. 20 even better. Fuddnik Aug 2015 #204

There was 26 in 2008 Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #281

Here is HRC on SS at 2008 debates MaggieD Aug 2015 #129

Easy ieoeja Aug 2015 #143

So you're in favor of raising taxes on the middle class? MaggieD Aug 2015 #149

I am 100% in favor of raising taxes on the UPPER middle class. Obama was wrong. ieoeja Aug 2015 #159

The point is that people making over $100,000 per year are in most parts of the country, not JDPriestly Aug 2015 #203

"She is a terrible debater" ...and the DNC know it. That's why the debates are being limited. L0oniX Aug 2015 #209

Who are you quoting? MaggieD Aug 2015 #217

You are so correct. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #233

Wow - that's insane MaggieD Aug 2015 #216

Where do you live? JDPriestly Aug 2015 #230

Terrible debater? Sure, if you say so, but a few dozen nations she engaged with disagree. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #235

We don't know that for sure. She only lasted four years in the State Department. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #237

Clinton's "only 4 years" was a time of a hard earned rebuilding of the destroyed relationship America had with Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #239

Thanks to Obama. Why do you think she left after four years? JDPriestly Aug 2015 #242

She was asked that and answered. Look it up. Four years rebuilding foreign relations. You dismiss that?? Wow. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #243

the alternative of course is increasing full retirement age, decreasing COLA, and perhaps means Warren Stupidity Aug 2015 #315

So in your mind we just debate on and on? Tommy2Tone Aug 2015 #86

No one is suggesting debating on and on. We want several debates jwirr Aug 2015 #132

Hopefully Scott Walker will be elected and we can watch the fireworks! randys1 Aug 2015 #6

I hear the GOP is secretly working with Hitler DNA. L0oniX Aug 2015 #13

I said if Bernie WASNT elected, sheesh randys1 Aug 2015 #32

So... kenfrequed Aug 2015 #23

The irony is that the GOPs best chance is Hillary. zeemike Aug 2015 #150

Under Hillary a SC appointee may be more Wall Street friendly than under Bernie, but said randys1 Aug 2015 #154

And you know this how? zeemike Aug 2015 #163

I read one of your posts yesterday ... Trajan Aug 2015 #207

"Looks like Hillary is a chicken" NCTraveler Aug 2015 #8

Chicken is now sexist? LMFAO L0oniX Aug 2015 #14

Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #18

Twisty. Chicken has always meant coward. Nice try. L0oniX Aug 2015 #26

I get your attempt at justification. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #28

What makes you think I have to justify shit to you. Try reading the ps: in the op. L0oniX Aug 2015 #35

Because you did use justification as a reply. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #36

Just go ahead and alert on it then if that what you think you are reading. L0oniX Aug 2015 #45

Why would I alert. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #93

They are daring us to alert. murielm99 Aug 2015 #107

Who are "they"? 840high Aug 2015 #115

Chickens? L0oniX Aug 2015 #210

.... 840high Aug 2015 #212

I want the DUer who called a person of color a "house rat" BANNED. I only find YOU using the term. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #224

+1 historylovr Aug 2015 #301

Looks like a jury did some "justification". L0oniX Aug 2015 #214

Yep, good hide. BeanMusical Aug 2015 #271

That's how I've always 840high Aug 2015 #114

I'm a woman and I don't believe the word, "chicken" is sexist. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #85

Male frontrunners who dodge debates have been called "chicken" for decades. FBaggins Aug 2015 #99

I agree. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #312

I seriously don't think fear has anything to do with it passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #321

Since when does chicken mean "woman'? Get real.. whathehell Aug 2015 #109

Did you not get the memo? a2liberal Aug 2015 #97

She is a chickenhawk. WDIM Aug 2015 #98

You were the victim of misrepresentation in an alert.. X_Digger Aug 2015 #248

thanks for the laugh! WDIM Aug 2015 #298

You should have alerted on #6 Mnpaul Sep 2015 #318

I didn't alert-- I served on a jury for the post I replied to. n/t X_Digger Sep 2015 #319

But I think you can now alert on comments made by a jury Mnpaul Sep 2015 #320

Apparently EVERYTHING is now sexist or racist. Its in the memo! 7962 Aug 2015 #181

Kristen Powers is a female Dennis Miller. sufrommich Aug 2015 #15

Can't debate the "valid points" so attack the messenger. Old tactic. L0oniX Aug 2015 #38

True, old "tactic". Which do you think is older, shooting the messenger or playing victim? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #83

Yes we should give all right wing hacks the benefit of the doubt. emulatorloo Aug 2015 #180

She was a liberal but discovered there was way more money to be made Tommy2Tone Aug 2015 #102

Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day tularetom Aug 2015 #104

This! Tommy2Tone Aug 2015 #89

Sexist would have been "hen". Chicken, not so much. MNBrewer Aug 2015 #90

You made a seriously flawed assumption for such a short post. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #103

to insult one woman is not sexist. retrowire Aug 2015 #91

Amazingly short sighted with a lack of insight to what sexism is. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #96

so if i call a black person a coward then im racist? retrowire Aug 2015 #110

Bazinga! 7962 Aug 2015 #182

That's just ridiculous. John Poet Aug 2015 #135

We have been calling men and women chicken for decades or more. I jwirr Aug 2015 #137

FFS, most Hillary haters love warren! Explain that! Nt Logical Aug 2015 #264

Selective sexism.... Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #282

ph god. really? A chicken is a coward and I've heard it used against everyone. Be mad about roguevalley Aug 2015 #317

One look at the first rethug debate kills your argument MaggieD Aug 2015 #9

O yea because the GOP has clown debates we should have limits on Dem debates. WTF L0oniX Aug 2015 #17

Unless we're at 49-51 on Senators MaggieD Aug 2015 #46

Given the enormous number of times Democratic senators vote against the party jeff47 Aug 2015 #56

Got an example? MaggieD Aug 2015 #64

Joe Manchin, Joe Liberman, Chuck Schumer jeff47 Aug 2015 #68

Whta 'dissing," what "crapping?" morningfog Aug 2015 #20

Actually, those are a great reason to have more debates. jeff47 Aug 2015 #49

I get it - Sanders sux and Hillary 840high Aug 2015 #116

You never fail to pit Bernie against Hillary jkbRN Aug 2015 #184

Maggie, I'm interested... MrMickeysMom Aug 2015 #206

I've rarely seen such confidence MoveIt Aug 2015 #296

I think it will backfire for the DNC ram2008 Aug 2015 #10

So here is a hypothetical MaggieD Aug 2015 #16

"People don't vote based on debates" LMFAO L0oniX Aug 2015 #19

Debates are meaningless, which is why the DNC needs to control them. winter is coming Aug 2015 #84

Wonderfully Put! Marty McGraw Aug 2015 #141

Nailed! L0oniX Aug 2015 #215

Genius! n/t ozone_man Aug 2015 #254

There are only a few significant events in a primary contest: announcements and dabates. morningfog Aug 2015 #24

There is 24/7 news MaggieD Aug 2015 #30

You can't deny the affect Obama had on Rmoney with "please proceed" L0oniX Aug 2015 #33

The 24/7 news is easily and usually tuned out, unless there is a big story like a scandal. morningfog Aug 2015 #58

6 is plenty MaggieD Aug 2015 #60

For a front runner, six is too many. For a front runner who is losing support and morningfog Aug 2015 #67

Why not just do away with them then? Hell, why even hold an election? frylock Aug 2015 #34

Again, 6 is plenty MaggieD Aug 2015 #37

27 Democratic primary debates in 2008 but 6 is plenty for you. L0oniX Aug 2015 #40

There are two candidates that disagree with you. frylock Aug 2015 #51

Too bad MaggieD Aug 2015 #53

There are two candidates that disagree with you. frylock Aug 2015 #55

So what? MaggieD Aug 2015 #61

Sew buttons. frylock Aug 2015 #63

Lol, gouda one! BeanMusical Aug 2015 #272

Can you show a post that comes remotely... NCTraveler Aug 2015 #41

27 Democratic primary debates in 2008 ...that's what I call a regular primary. L0oniX Aug 2015 #48

That's what I call watered down. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #54

You wouldn't compromise with 16 debates? L0oniX Aug 2015 #65

Hillary supporters do NOT compromise. John Poet Aug 2015 #140

^^^this^^^ L0oniX Aug 2015 #213

Actually, they do. Fawke Em Aug 2015 #92

Well I support Sanders, and perfer MOM as a 2nd choice, but that's a piss-poor article Armstead Aug 2015 #11

Yes, O'Malley IS trying to be intellectually honest, and he IS! elleng Aug 2015 #50

I'm referring to the journalist and article, not O'Malley Armstead Aug 2015 #57

You don't really expect DWS to be honest about the reason the debates are so few compared to 2008? L0oniX Aug 2015 #218

Interesting article from the author of The Silencing: How the Left Is Killing Free Speech. Metric System Aug 2015 #21

Attack the messenger again? WTF Yea look at who is trying to kill free speech here. L0oniX Aug 2015 #29

BUSTED! Kirsten Powers!! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #81

YES! Limbaugh and Newsbusters deserve a fair shake here! emulatorloo Aug 2015 #185

Attack the messenger again? AlbertCat Aug 2015 #299

So? elleng Aug 2015 #47

Oh shit. I thought I recognized that name Armstead Aug 2015 #59

Apparently this ex-Fox News "liberal" house pet has found a new home at DU! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #87

Well she is not alone as far as DU members that speak on Fox goes. L0oniX Aug 2015 #220

You like these ex-Fox News propagandists, you can keep them, they are useful for attacking Clinton. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #234

It's not his new home, Steven Leser has been here a while now Dragonfli Aug 2015 #249

What? How did Steven Lesser get into this, the OP is echoing Kirsten Powers. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #250

I thought the poster mentioned something about a FOX pet liberal DUer Dragonfli Aug 2015 #260

^^^this^^^ L0oniX Aug 2015 #310

Calling her chicken is fowl... FSogol Aug 2015 #27

"fowl" How dare you use such a sexist word! L0oniX Aug 2015 #31

and TRUE!!!!! elleng Aug 2015 #44

You beat me by 40 minutes but sure is TRUE! elleng Aug 2015 #43

A message to Bernie Supporters cosmicone Aug 2015 #52

Wow ...sorry can't respond in full ...too busy LOL. L0oniX Aug 2015 #66

LOL Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #295

Goddamn right.... Splinter Cell Aug 2015 #69

Again, innuendos, conjectural platitudes and unproven allegations cosmicone Aug 2015 #76

And forwarding the chickenscrawling of RW nutjob Kirsten Powers! What does that tell you? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #79

Let me ask you... Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #284

I guess this means you will be leaving DU when Hillary wins the primary? leftofcool Aug 2015 #78

~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #222

...^ that 840high Aug 2015 #121

+1 Preach it loudly. L0oniX Aug 2015 #221

Good post, Hillary will shine in the debates, she knows facts and she should be able to show she is Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #189

Which is why we are going to have so few of them? daleanime Aug 2015 #256

I bellieve some will be happy only 6 was scheduled. Who needs to run a clown car? Leave this to Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #257

Who needs to prove their ability to campaign in the general election? daleanime Aug 2015 #258

Hillary and the DNC knows that Hillary will be destroyed by Bernie. nt Logical Aug 2015 #265

ummmm yeah cosmicone Aug 2015 #270

I see the red herrings are in full swing. Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #285

If you believe in the power of your ideas, there should be more debates. Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #62

of course they have to keep her exposure to a minimum. bowens43 Aug 2015 #70

"Do you support the TPP, yes or no?" Ikonoklast Aug 2015 #73

"Do you support the XL pipeline, yes or no?" L0oniX Aug 2015 #223

I am for any situation that will get FlatBaroque Aug 2015 #71

That would be getting hrc away from party power. elleng Aug 2015 #72

The DNC Needs Hillary colsohlibgal Aug 2015 #74

You may have hit on something worth investigating. L0oniX Aug 2015 #225

Kirsten Powers? A Fox News Kirsten Powers opinion piece?? Thank you for my daily laugh!! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #75

You should have seen all the recs Ann Coulter got. leftofcool Aug 2015 #82

Anne Coulter got lots of REC's...on DU?? You have to be kidding me!! Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #88

This OP has 49 recs and counting Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #111

Not only that, these known RW nutjob opinionators are given the mantle of "messenger" and are defended. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #142

Bernie supporter here, and right-wing hacks are right-wing hacks to me emulatorloo Aug 2015 #188

Hopefully, the other candidates will join O'Malley in his rebellion against the DNC. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #77

What a surprise! The only one's who agree with Debbie Wasserman Schultz are Clinton supporters. delrem Aug 2015 #80

FOUR debates before Iowa/New Hampshire. One of those on Dec. 19th (< 1 wk. before Xmas). stillwaiting Aug 2015 #94

bad blood has already resulted from this. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #118

The bunker mentality has never worked for anyone. One of the biggest jwirr Aug 2015 #152

and, the reason why we got Nixon was b/c of a Centrist Dem nashville_brook Aug 2015 #155

It's not only possible that we will only have 4, it's the most likely outcome. jeff47 Aug 2015 #171

Oh waaaah waaah waaah okasha Aug 2015 #95

Brilliant augmentation. L0oniX Aug 2015 #226

Truth needs no augmentation. okasha Aug 2015 #245

Did Hillary lose a 30 point lead in 2008 . LOL! nt Logical Aug 2015 #266

There is no reason for her to lose her current lead, okasha Aug 2015 #267

She's already lost 21 points, are you saying John Poet Aug 2015 #275

Here's my biggest question Flying Squirrel Aug 2015 #100

If you saw yesterday's press conference, you see why she's shielded. 7962 Aug 2015 #101

You need to listen and watch her Town halls where people ask riversedge Aug 2015 #106

Her "townhall" yesterday was hand picked attendance. Just per usual. 7962 Aug 2015 #156

what do you mean by hand picked? riversedge Aug 2015 #158

I think you are probably right about small groups. But as president she is jwirr Aug 2015 #157

this has been my solemn opinion since the beginning. knr n/t retrowire Aug 2015 #108

+1 ...you've some what restored my confidence in humanity. L0oniX Aug 2015 #227

There is a scenario that must frighten Debbie and Hillary. Bernie NCjack Aug 2015 #112

We don't need a coward in the White House Android3.14 Aug 2015 #113

those debates are needed to sell our candidates to the voting public as a whole nashville_brook Aug 2015 #123

You have that right, but the DNC dislikes the plural use of the noun, "candidate" Android3.14 Aug 2015 #172

K&R. Chicken. She is not a good debater, in other words, she is not a competent candidate. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #117

WTF? She was a very good debater in 2007 and 2008. I remember Jeff Toobin saying it was like Gladys Metric System Aug 2015 #151

Obama was much better. She does not come across as likeable in the debates, and especially JDPriestly Aug 2015 #200

yep, it's called indefensible BS -- IOKIYAHS stupidicus Aug 2015 #120

When she speaks its dry and unmotivating d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #122

"like listening to Ben Stein reading War and Peace" RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #127

To me she always seems like she does not want to be there. I would jwirr Aug 2015 #161

I don't see the Clintons as ever freezing up in fear Babel_17 Aug 2015 #125

if neither Sanders nor O'Malley can take her out in 6 debates, then they aren't fit for the general. msanthrope Aug 2015 #128

Yep OhWiseOne Aug 2015 #138

the Democratic primary audience is open to both Sanders and O'Malley's platforms msanthrope Aug 2015 #146

That would be true IF this were the general election. However, the primaries jwirr Aug 2015 #164

There's no lack of debates, before and after the early elections... msanthrope Aug 2015 #173

Well as you know your candidate is not doing so well at getting her jwirr Aug 2015 #175

your concern for my candidates message is touching. nt msanthrope Aug 2015 #177

~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #229

oh boo hoo.. Amimnoch Aug 2015 #139

Wealthy, evil industrialists illustrated by the character "Mr. Burns" Zorra Aug 2015 #145

doh Amimnoch Aug 2015 #169

Looks like they don't want a "Democratic" primary where there's more than one candidate. L0oniX Aug 2015 #232

Gotta love all the logical fallacies and strawmen. Bohemianwriter Aug 2015 #286

I Guarantee . . . Gamecock Lefty Aug 2015 #148

Haters? This is an election. Chosing a candidate does not indicate hate. jwirr Aug 2015 #166

Primary time flame-throwing, nothing more GitRDun Aug 2015 #153

LOL. I love your cheer. jwirr Aug 2015 #167

In my best Elvis voice.. GitRDun Aug 2015 #197

And I am old enough to have loved Elvis. jwirr Aug 2015 #246

It's unfortunate so many don't know the DNC announced SIX DNC sanctioned debates in 2007... Spazito Aug 2015 #162

The only thing any anti-fact, anti-Hillary crowd wants to shield is a lot of very fact challenged talking points. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #165

Here's some Wiki "facts" for you... L0oniX Aug 2015 #238

Good thing the Democratic Party members, then and now, got sensible about that nonsense. The current schedule was set...when? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #240

Did they have an exclusivity clause back then? That is my target. Total jwirr Aug 2015 #168

Nope, same dynamics apply during this primary as last... Spazito Aug 2015 #170

Correct. But there is an exclusivity clause - we adopted it from the Rs jwirr Aug 2015 #174

Sadly, we've been adopting a LOT of things from the Rs, I fear. n/t RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #176

It appears the 'exclusivity clause' has a gaping hole in it... Spazito Aug 2015 #178

That was the Rs. They had a "forum" the night before their debate and jwirr Aug 2015 #179

There is nothing to say any of the candidates would not agree... Spazito Aug 2015 #183

That is pretty much like it used to be. jwirr Aug 2015 #186

And probably will be again when it all shakes out. Spazito Aug 2015 #187

Three of those were before the first one this time. Nt. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #193

I wasn't 'debating' the timing schedule, I was pointing out the numbers n/t Spazito Aug 2015 #194

Fair enough. Juicy_Bellows Aug 2015 #195

So Wiki got it wrong? I count 26 debates. L0oniX Aug 2015 #236

The DNC sanctioned 6 in 2007 just as they have for 2016... Spazito Aug 2015 #241

Wow, 2 of those debates were held as late as April of 2008. Major Hogwash Aug 2015 #283

Full EXPOSURE is Hillary's biggest enemy, not Bernie or any GOPer nikto Aug 2015 #199

I am looking forward to the debates, it will be a time with the DNC candidates on the stage together Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #211

Kristen Powers. LOL... SidDithers Aug 2015 #219

~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #309

If she needs this much coddling and sheltering now, senz Aug 2015 #252

I rec'd because the point is correct dreamnightwind Aug 2015 #276

Long live the Queen!...Long live the Queen!... paleotn Aug 2015 #291

Give me a break Keep-Left Aug 2015 #292

They're doing it to save Bernie Sanders the embarrassment of being thrashed by Cllinton. George II Aug 2015 #293

Being thrashed more than six times, you mean. okasha Aug 2015 #307

~ L0oniX Aug 2015 #308

It is critical. Puzzledtraveller Aug 2015 #303