2016 Postmortem

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

27. Pffft.

Reply to cherokeeprogressive (Reply #18)

Mon Jul 27, 2015, 02:50 PM

Jul 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

166 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NY Times Attends Clinton House Party in Iowa, Finds Instead MORE SANDERS SUPPORT In Evidence. [View all] Segami Jul 2015 OP

The NYTimes has little credibility left... JaneyVee Jul 2015 #1

They didn't spread anything about Clinton. Fawke Em Jul 2015 #2

I am getting confused artislife Jul 2015 #35

I'm confused, too. Fawke Em Jul 2015 #37

D-KOS good nuff for me. Why shoot the progressive messenger? InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #151

Sure they are.... Segami Jul 2015 #3

Are we fighting Oceania today..or... artislife Jul 2015 #38

damn, artislife. That is funny. :D and true roguevalley Jul 2015 #64

Bookmarking for the next time you quote a positive NYT article about Hillary. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #4

Would you bookmark this for the next time Segami links to them to make a point. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #9

Sure. Consistency and all. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #10

Please see post 2 BeanMusical Jul 2015 #16

I see it. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #17

Thank you for the kicks. BeanMusical Jul 2015 #20

You are very welcome. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #22

He ALMOST convinced me SCantiGOP Jul 2015 #29

So said... Segami Jul 2015 #80

I don't care to glorify the NYT either way like so many here do... Segami Jul 2015 #82

Maybe that's what I'm missing. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #101

You're missing a lot more.... Segami Jul 2015 #103

Your welcome for the bump. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #106

Sen Sanders represents the 99%. I am guessing that some prefer the 1%. rhett o rick Jul 2015 #127

You don't have to take my word for it: JaneyVee Jul 2015 #12

Don't worry. I wouldn't. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #18

Pffft. JaneyVee Jul 2015 #27

+1 L0oniX Jul 2015 #76

You nor anyone else with a lick of sense n/t Scootaloo Jul 2015 #115

given that the people there told their stuff, I don't see how trashing NYT changes that. roguevalley Jul 2015 #62

That's what I said the last time they distorted storied related to the Left. sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #71

Prey tell us which news outlet you prefer. We hear about all kinds that are in disfavor with rhett o rick Jul 2015 #123

No Citizen Need Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go cantbeserious Jul 2015 #5

Agreed! Big Vincenz Jul 2015 #32

a-frickin-men cocainecowboy Jul 2015 #42

Go Bernie Go! Agony Jul 2015 #66

Strike up the band!... InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #152

You can say that again! MrMickeysMom Jul 2015 #111

Damn I love your kitties! nt artislife Jul 2015 #156

And just as much as I love cats... MrMickeysMom Jul 2015 #157

I am pet sitting a short hair as we speak artislife Jul 2015 #160

It's a trend, and it will continue. arcane1 Jul 2015 #6

I have felt this way for quite a while now. A Simple Game Jul 2015 #7

Your last paragraph is my experience, too. Jane Austin Jul 2015 #11

That pretty much describes everyone in my family, but one...my mom. She just wants to see a woman President before she dies, as do I. InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #153

Yep. BeanMusical Jul 2015 #13

Another carefully manicured quote. okasha Jul 2015 #72

Really depends on who and how you define as "conservative"... cascadiance Jul 2015 #107

Sorry. I do not trust anyone okasha Jul 2015 #109

I don't trust them either... cascadiance Jul 2015 #110

See preceding post. okasha Jul 2015 #112

We're not talking about who BERNIE wants as voters, but who voters want as president! cascadiance Jul 2015 #113

Disingenuous. okasha Jul 2015 #116

They'll get it by being better off when Korporate Amerika pays their share of taxes, etc. cascadiance Jul 2015 #117

Suuurrre. okasha Jul 2015 #118

Suuurrre. BeanMusical Jul 2015 #121

LMAO! beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #122

Lol, they sure do. BeanMusical Jul 2015 #124

Isn't she past the pupae stage? cocainecowboy Jul 2015 #159

I guess some people forgot her stance on equal rights in 2008. beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #161

"Clinton Seeking Shared Ground Over Abortions" beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #119

You forgot to mention that he's a racist too. BeanMusical Jul 2015 #120

Is he? okasha Jul 2015 #129

"Sanders has already dismissed women:s (sic) reproductive rights and LGBT equality" BeanMusical Jul 2015 #130

Agree. Where the hell did that come from? n/t Dawgs Jul 2015 #140

*crickets* beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #149

My phone won't do links very well, okasha Jul 2015 #150

That blog post is your *evidence* that he "dismissed" women's and lgbt rights? beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #154

Really davidpdx Jul 2015 #135

"Bernie can lie down with these dogs if he wants power that badly" beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #114

Amen to that. Behind every Huckabee is a corporation. raouldukelives Jul 2015 #143

Would it be safe to assume that your circle of friends outside DU MyNameGoesHere Jul 2015 #14

I will admit my circle is not that large but my best friend is a conservative who A Simple Game Jul 2015 #44

I'm friends with a Libertarian davidpdx Jul 2015 #136

which is why deb ws is postponing the debates restorefreedom Jul 2015 #21

She can't postpone them forever. Duval Jul 2015 #36

i agree with you on the numbers ..bernie will really take off restorefreedom Jul 2015 #59

yup yup, just a matter of time. tic, tic, tic... InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #155

To be fair she must be good on stage, after all Goldman Sachs paid her 250k to speak. L0oniX Jul 2015 #75

The more she postpones them, the weaker Hillary looks. winter is coming Jul 2015 #147

"when asked they can't give me a reason why other than "it's her turn" or "it's time for a woman"" senz Jul 2015 #23

You forgot "THE SUPREME COURT!!1!!" tularetom Jul 2015 #28

OMG, how could I forget SCOTUS??? senz Jul 2015 #31

No we don't, not at all dsc Jul 2015 #39

Obviously Democrats are better than Republicans. Obviously. senz Jul 2015 #50

actually the presumptin is that she is attempting to play on a level playing field Sheepshank Jul 2015 #40

Much of the "thought" on DU in the last few months okasha Jul 2015 #45

^^^^^^^^^ sunnystarr Jul 2015 #67

It is a pretty shitty assumption davidpdx Jul 2015 #137

you must be confusing campaing funding with personal finance Sheepshank Jul 2015 #142

I never said, nor implied anything about her "lining her own pockets with campaign money" davidpdx Jul 2015 #165

Wait a minute artislife Jul 2015 #158

I have also heard "she's the only one that can win in the general election" one too. A Simple Game Jul 2015 #46

That's right, that's what I used to hear, too. But lately her numbers senz Jul 2015 #49

Same here, silence on her stands. I caught part of a speech she did the other day on A Simple Game Jul 2015 #53

"Hillary: Better Than a Republican." beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #70

Yep, if she gets the nom, that'll be the one. senz Jul 2015 #83

I know some Hillary supporters.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #60

"The New York Times is shape-shifting into the National Enquirer" Segami 4/20/2015 nt. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #8

LOL SunSeeker Jul 2015 #65

And who do you prefer for a news souce? nm rhett o rick Jul 2015 #125

I was clearly quoting the op. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #138

So what are your thoughts about the Times? BeanMusical Jul 2015 #144

Kick and R. Great post. BeanMusical Jul 2015 #15

Great article. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #19

Smacks of "email criminal investigation" journalism George II Jul 2015 #24

After the latest NYTimes hit piece on Hillary and emails, that Newsweek said was "despicable," pnwmom Jul 2015 #25

You mean Media Matters, founded by one time Clinton enemy turned Clinton sycophant David Brock? tularetom Jul 2015 #30

They listed the stories, all well known and proven false stories that the NYT had published pnwmom Jul 2015 #43

The NY Times may have indeed stepped on their collective foreskins with the "criminal investigation" tularetom Jul 2015 #48

Considering that 250K state department emails on the classified system ended up with Wikileaks, pnwmom Jul 2015 #55

I'm a Bernie supporter but druidity33 Jul 2015 #97

Three months ago the op would have fully agreed with you on your assessment. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #34

The revolution will not be televised . . . or even reported on by big media Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #26

And I hope to God it's happening right now. senz Jul 2015 #54

You and me both, my brother . . . or sister. nt Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #58

The revolution will be tweeted azmom Jul 2015 #69

many primary voters aren't diehards for X or Y, they're looking for the best deal--who best MisterP Jul 2015 #33

By all means, read the full NYT story. okasha Jul 2015 #41

So...Daily KOS and the NYT are Republicans, now? Hmm. senz Jul 2015 #52

The NYT has a possibly fatal case of hepatitis; okasha Jul 2015 #73

No, dpatbrown Jul 2015 #63

Oh come on! The ONLY reason she lost the last time was because Obama had a logo.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #47

Drat! Bernie foiled by his logolessness LondonReign2 Jul 2015 #56

ehhemm ...grumble ...mumble ...something about hair ...and teddy bear. L0oniX Jul 2015 #77

You inspired me ... nikto Jul 2015 #96

I have no idea on the accuracy since it is coming from the ny times still_one Jul 2015 #51

If this were reversed, would you feel the same distrust? -nt- 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #61

You mean the poll reversed on the other candidates, absolutely. As far as I am concerned the NY still_one Jul 2015 #68

Oh, dear. CLEANUP IN GD P! beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #57

Bwahahahahah L0oniX Jul 2015 #78

As soon as I saw the title I knew how it would be received. beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #79

That's perfect, bmus. senz Jul 2015 #85

Now they're running an "anti-Clinton operation". beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #86

Maybe if these H-arrow people knew how unfairly the NYT has treated Bernie, senz Jul 2015 #92

The same HC supporters who rec threads citing socialist rags critical of Bernie? beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #95

"them" "looking at this rationally" ...would spoil all the fun we're having. L0oniX Jul 2015 #98

Ikr? beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #100

K & R!!! Thespian2 Jul 2015 #74

I'll vote for Hillary if I have too madokie Jul 2015 #81

When is the NYT going to shut down its anti-Clinton operation? Didn't they learn anything... George II Jul 2015 #84

Funny thing about Sanders: he bears no animosity toward HRC. Likes her, in fact. senz Jul 2015 #88

Clinton has campaigned for him and donated to his campaigns. George II Jul 2015 #91

We sure are dumb, aren't we? I'm selling my eggs and donating to Hillary! beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #90

That. Is. Brilliant ! artislife Jul 2015 #162

Hey we women really know how to sacrifice for the cause. beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #163

*chortle nt artislife Jul 2015 #164

To paraphrase Noam Chomsky ... nikto Jul 2015 #87

Nailed it! n/t L0oniX Jul 2015 #93

Thanks! nikto Jul 2015 #146

While so many are so focused on articles like this Hillary is busy giving her policies. Thinkingabout Jul 2015 #89

What I see as coming from this Babel_17 Jul 2015 #94

Babel, I hope you're wrong. It's too depressing. senz Jul 2015 #99

The Hollywood Ending to that hypothetical ... Babel_17 Jul 2015 #104

Can't stand the way zentrum Jul 2015 #102

You never see her characterized or referred to Segami Jul 2015 #105

I've never seen her referred to that way in the New York Times dflprincess Jul 2015 #108

Not in the MSM zentrum Jul 2015 #139

The article doesn't support your title. RandySF Jul 2015 #126

K & R. Two comments on your excellent post PatrickforO Jul 2015 #128

Kick! BeanMusical Jul 2015 #131

NY Times is a socialist cabal out to get Hillary :tinfoilhat: Cheese Sandwich Jul 2015 #132

Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, whose hard-left policies... SoapBox Jul 2015 #133

Most of the hardline activist volunteers know will not support Hillary emsimon33 Jul 2015 #134

About those poll numbers. They are polling on landlines. sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #141

Yeah but remember Bernie d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #145

This is the actual choice ... nikto Jul 2015 #148

"hard left" WTF Gray Lady... WTF? apnu Jul 2015 #166