Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Can we get honest here ... [View all]femmocrat
(28,394 posts)51. I found the following DU post helpful:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022626626
It might or might not interest someone who doesn't quite "get it" yet. Worth a look-see at least.
It might or might not interest someone who doesn't quite "get it" yet. Worth a look-see at least.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You may trust the administration on this, I don't. Here's a gentle reminder from Obama in 2008
Autumn
Apr 2013
#22
SS has NOTHING to do with the DEFICIT. Closing "loopholes" to increase effective tax rates does.
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#28
The FACT that SS can't have any effect by LAW does matter. There is no DEBATE about facts,
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#40
WTF does that have anything to do with REALITY? If you and a friend are planning dinner and
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#45
I'm sorry you missed the relevance … When one party refuses to deal with objective REALITY
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#57
Why there are on-going debates and very little governing? Because while we watch the "Debates"
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#62
What are the details of these exemptions? You seem to be making assertions that are impossible.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#16
No, the statement from the WH said 'the most vulerable' which is the opposite of specified groups.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#36
You have not made any points, and now you are calling names in an attempt to cover your lack of
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#68
Are you saying the President's proposal wouldn't cut benefits for regular folks?
limpyhobbler
Apr 2013
#27
It's in a person's interest to want what they feel they deserve. I don't know anyone who doesn't
southernyankeebelle
Apr 2013
#55
I'd accept Chained CPI in a heart-beat in exchange for Universal Pre-K (day-care). nt
patrice
Apr 2013
#78
I'm finding it quite interesting that my Rep. Senators are against Chained CPI. At this point, I'm
patrice
Apr 2013
#79
Yes I did, and a more horrendous bunch of BS I havent seen. It's rather Freeper.
Katashi_itto
Apr 2013
#99
If you don't like the policy (and I'm not really going to argue in favor of it either), then fine
Proud Liberal Dem
Apr 2013
#100
"self-interested folks, hiding behind the elderly, the poor" Sociopath honesty?
L0oniX
Apr 2013
#103
Many seniors vote for Republicans and against their best interests. Maybe those seniors will finally
Liberal_Stalwart71
Apr 2013
#119