Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Can we get honest here ... [View all]Trajan
(19,089 posts)4. Unfair criticism
"every suggestion of instituting a CCPI has included statement indicating that these most vulnerable groups will be exempted from the change."
Really ??? ... I have heard MANY times about Chained CPI without hearing any references to 'the most vulnerable groups will be exempted' .... Many many times, no such 'canard' was offered .....
You live as an individual ... a being who inhabits the space between your own eyes ... YOU see with those eyes ... NOBODY ELSE sees what you see, automatically .... While your personal experience could indicate what others might experience as well (if they looked at the same things), there is no guarantee that everyone has heard or understands that 'canard' ...
Even your post here leaves that 'canard' to the very last sentence .... It is deeply embedded in your phrases and clauses and sentences ... It is NOT 'obvious' ....
Even so .... Social Security is NOT really a problem, and there are other solutions other than reducing the amount of SSI recipients will receive in so called Cost Of Living increases .... That is another line of objection that has nothing to do with that 'canard' ...
It is fair to criticize it on that basis alone ....
EDIT: You have DU's premier Right Wing Economist on your side ..... THAT's the company you are keeping ?
Really ??? ... I have heard MANY times about Chained CPI without hearing any references to 'the most vulnerable groups will be exempted' .... Many many times, no such 'canard' was offered .....
You live as an individual ... a being who inhabits the space between your own eyes ... YOU see with those eyes ... NOBODY ELSE sees what you see, automatically .... While your personal experience could indicate what others might experience as well (if they looked at the same things), there is no guarantee that everyone has heard or understands that 'canard' ...
Even your post here leaves that 'canard' to the very last sentence .... It is deeply embedded in your phrases and clauses and sentences ... It is NOT 'obvious' ....
Even so .... Social Security is NOT really a problem, and there are other solutions other than reducing the amount of SSI recipients will receive in so called Cost Of Living increases .... That is another line of objection that has nothing to do with that 'canard' ...
It is fair to criticize it on that basis alone ....
EDIT: You have DU's premier Right Wing Economist on your side ..... THAT's the company you are keeping ?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You may trust the administration on this, I don't. Here's a gentle reminder from Obama in 2008
Autumn
Apr 2013
#22
SS has NOTHING to do with the DEFICIT. Closing "loopholes" to increase effective tax rates does.
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#28
The FACT that SS can't have any effect by LAW does matter. There is no DEBATE about facts,
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#40
WTF does that have anything to do with REALITY? If you and a friend are planning dinner and
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#45
I'm sorry you missed the relevance … When one party refuses to deal with objective REALITY
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#57
Why there are on-going debates and very little governing? Because while we watch the "Debates"
Vincardog
Apr 2013
#62
What are the details of these exemptions? You seem to be making assertions that are impossible.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#16
No, the statement from the WH said 'the most vulerable' which is the opposite of specified groups.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#36
You have not made any points, and now you are calling names in an attempt to cover your lack of
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#68
Are you saying the President's proposal wouldn't cut benefits for regular folks?
limpyhobbler
Apr 2013
#27
It's in a person's interest to want what they feel they deserve. I don't know anyone who doesn't
southernyankeebelle
Apr 2013
#55
I'd accept Chained CPI in a heart-beat in exchange for Universal Pre-K (day-care). nt
patrice
Apr 2013
#78
I'm finding it quite interesting that my Rep. Senators are against Chained CPI. At this point, I'm
patrice
Apr 2013
#79
Yes I did, and a more horrendous bunch of BS I havent seen. It's rather Freeper.
Katashi_itto
Apr 2013
#99
If you don't like the policy (and I'm not really going to argue in favor of it either), then fine
Proud Liberal Dem
Apr 2013
#100
"self-interested folks, hiding behind the elderly, the poor" Sociopath honesty?
L0oniX
Apr 2013
#103
Many seniors vote for Republicans and against their best interests. Maybe those seniors will finally
Liberal_Stalwart71
Apr 2013
#119