Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
10. You're missing the point. This is about McCain's judgement. Palin was a rotten choice, period.
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 06:43 AM
Feb 2013

No one is saying that Palin solely caused McCain to lose, and no one is saying Obama didn't win it on his own merits. Obama would most likely have won regardless of Palin. However, you choose a VP candidate based on experience and credentials. It is THE most important decision a Presidential candidate makes. McCain went with his advisers who chose Palin because they wanted a game changer who could win over women and gin up the base. She was not properly vetted, was grossly unprepared, and a rotten choice. The buck stops with McCain. He CHOSE her. Alaska is a red state and she apparently had some folksy credentials and got in up in that state small in population. Who knows why they elected her governor up there. She is none too bright by any means and only got her media entertainment jobs because she got some notoriety as the VP candidate and because there are some people frankly numb enough to buy into her idiocy. It is like asking how Limbaugh became a millionaire. He saw a numb audience and got in with them. They buy into his bullshit and send him money. Same as any snake oil salesman. Pray on the ignorant. McCain used rotten judgement. Period.

Touché on both points. tblue Feb 2013 #1
Thank you. Yes, my language was tough, but is was sarcasm and satire and that is all. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #2
Not sexist. Misogynistic. JTFrog Feb 2013 #18
I think McCain choosing her was a good thing. Kalidurga Feb 2013 #3
Yes, good for us in that sense, but good for him? Good for the country if he had gotten in? NOPE. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #4
Yeah somehow I am not worried about what is good for McCain... Kalidurga Feb 2013 #5
Me neither. But the question to him would be whether was it a good choice for HIM and the NATION. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #6
LOL I guess I was looking at it from a positive outcome perspective... Kalidurga Feb 2013 #7
Barack Obama WON in 2008. Sarah had NOTHING to do with President Obama winning. graham4anything Feb 2013 #8
You're missing the point. This is about McCain's judgement. Palin was a rotten choice, period. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #10
Voters judged in 2008 and in a landslide voted FOR President Obama graham4anything Feb 2013 #14
You might want to take a look at what other DU'er's think about your language. mnhtnbb Feb 2013 #9
One post in thousands. Tons of other "language" on here all the time. Toughen up. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #11
5 to 1 jury agreed with me. You were out of line. Wise up. mnhtnbb Feb 2013 #13
I would expect you will alert on "Rinsed Penis" the next time you that as well. Hmmm...? RBInMaine Feb 2013 #28
"Toughen up" against misogynistic language? obamanut2012 Feb 2013 #16
I will not toughen up. Texasgal Feb 2013 #22
So stuff like "Rinsed Penis" is ok but the rough anti-Palin language wasn't? Double standard. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #12
self-delete N/T BlueStater Feb 2013 #15
Two wrongs make a right? JTFrog Feb 2013 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Feb 2013 #17
+ 1 n/t JTFrog Feb 2013 #20
But "naked man" and "rinsed penis" is ok? Try Hypersensitivity Anonymous. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #26
you purposely used language you knew would be offensive to every woman on du. that was your intent. seabeyond Feb 2013 #21
You are being hypersensitive and ridiculous to generalize and extrapolate like that over one post. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #25
your post was misogynist. that simple. your dismissal and lecturing women on being hypersensitive is seabeyond Feb 2013 #27
Again, "Rinsed Penis" is fine and dandy. Other things are not. Double standards. Hypersensitivity. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #29
your post was misogynist and you excuse it. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #30
BTW, I guess the woman from whom I first heard say that is "mysoginistic" as well. So lighten up. RBInMaine Feb 2013 #31
that is what a misogynist would say. sumthin' to be proud about. nt seabeyond Feb 2013 #32
I, myself have always wondered Sheepshank Feb 2013 #23
Answer the question Magoo.. The right thing to do ?? Yes or No. We know the answer and Filibuster Harry Feb 2013 #24
No one needs to "toughen up" to suit you. We have standards, and this misogyny you display disgusts bettyellen Feb 2013 #33
No fool like an old fool....I have absolutely NO respect left for McCain... Tippy Feb 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hey McCain, was choosing ...»Reply #10