Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TwilightZone

(25,472 posts)
53. There is nothing more hypothetical then making vague assertions about the future.
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 01:12 AM
Dec 2016

We need to beat up our candidates more! Yeah!

This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Dec 2016 #1
Every candidate in every election who has an opponent is "damaged" in the primaries. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #2
Obama vs. Clinton. Obama came out stronger than ever. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #5
Field test are just that. Lochloosa Dec 2016 #3
Problem was Bernie was not field-tested -not-reeeeeeally-vetted!! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #7
Hillary didn't have the number for the nomination until June Omaha Steve Dec 2016 #9
AhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhtheMathAhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhH Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #11
Wasn't that what Hillary was supposed to do? Really vet and field-test him? The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #19
No she was supposed to go for the primary win AND make sure to not lose Bernie's supporters Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #24
Oh, piffle. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #28
Yes! You're right! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #29
The "Or Bust" crowd is only happy when they are trashing Hillary or Democrats. LonePirate Dec 2016 #32
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #58
How dare he awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #124
He did not create Hillary's real problems as a candidate. He did not participate in the hype either. Ford_Prefect Dec 2016 #23
Real problems? Most are fake? You know who has real problems!??? Trump. Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #25
Switch the focus rather than answer the question much? Ford_Prefect Dec 2016 #31
Trump: Words are fake! promises are fake! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #34
Astute commentary 90-percent Dec 2016 #113
+1000. nt awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #125
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Dec 2016 #130
Not relevant. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #35
Okee! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #38
The real problem was, Bernie refused to engage Hillary on the emails problem BlueProgressive Dec 2016 #82
Thanks for this post. PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2016 #4
Yup. sfwriter Dec 2016 #6
Destiny? Begabig Dec 2016 #112
Ding! A-Schwarzenegger Dec 2016 #8
Thank you! jimlup Dec 2016 #10
So, we can put to rest the "Sanders would have won" bullshit. baldguy Dec 2016 #12
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #16
First of all, Clinton got 2.5 million more votes than Trump. baldguy Dec 2016 #26
Along with "Blame Sanders." Orsino Dec 2016 #135
See #26 baldguy Dec 2016 #172
Can we please put this issue to rest!!! tom_kelly Dec 2016 #13
And now we see what happens when someone isn't even redlined. Hillary was not really hit that bad Exilednight Dec 2016 #14
Excellent point, Exilednight! Folks don't see this at all, though. Blamers gotta blame. JudyM Dec 2016 #43
Unlike HRC in 08 awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #127
YES! +10000 TXCritter Dec 2016 #15
I think the Primary made Secretary Clinton stronger, not weaker elmac Dec 2016 #17
zi don't blame the primary, Bernie, or anyone else associatedd with the nomination. napi21 Dec 2016 #18
Sanders caused Hillary to be a BETTER candidate. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #20
Don't you remember how they didn't need us GummyBearz Dec 2016 #169
Some I know are not only blaming Sanders but everything he represents. Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2016 #21
He represents awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #128
Bingo. He talks the way Democrats talked before Reagan.... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2016 #148
Wish I could rec your reply. nt awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #155
Hear, hear. LS_Editor Dec 2016 #22
The Democratic Party is doing this? murielm99 Dec 2016 #45
Ah, I see. Republican behavor reflects on the Republican Party, but the reverse is not true for... LS_Editor Dec 2016 #174
You have not proven anything. n/t murielm99 Dec 2016 #175
Right. Because a significant number of Democrats here haven't been scapegoating Bernie Sanders. LS_Editor Dec 2016 #176
Bernie is out grave dancing. murielm99 Dec 2016 #177
Thank you for confirming my point. Hate the man who acts more like a Democrat. LS_Editor Dec 2016 #178
Nailed it! Nt LostOne4Ever Dec 2016 #27
I don't think someone understands the concept of Democrats nominating a Democrat LonePirate Dec 2016 #30
Yeah, I don't. Because it's nonsense. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #37
Bernie was soundly defeated in the open primary system you advocate. LonePirate Dec 2016 #42
I eagerly await the day you make a point instead of arguing hypotheticals. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #46
There is nothing more hypothetical then making vague assertions about the future. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #53
Do you sharpen your knives with stones or pillows? hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #54
I eagerly await the day you acknowledge facts instead of embracing fantasy. LonePirate Dec 2016 #114
The current primary system is flawed. hay rick Dec 2016 #52
Sanders should never have allowed to run in our party. Period. The end. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2016 #33
Why? hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #40
Because he cared more about himself than the Democratic party. SunSeeker Dec 2016 #71
Oh Bullshit. progressoid Dec 2016 #84
They were nothing like his primary rallies. They were not huge rallies. SunSeeker Dec 2016 #86
Its funny. During the primaries we kept getting told that Bernie's huge rallies didn't mean anything progressoid Dec 2016 #89
I never said his rallies were meaningless. Please stop making shit up. nt. SunSeeker Dec 2016 #90
No, but it was a common meme on DU from the Clinton camp to mock them. progressoid Dec 2016 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Dec 2016 #96
Well, do you agree or not? If you think they were meaningful, then he probably should have done boston bean Dec 2016 #109
I see you just don't want to address want I actually said. nt SunSeeker Dec 2016 #133
I see you just don't want to address want I actually said. nt SunSeeker Dec 2016 #132
Thank you, SunSeeker for getting the gd facts out there. Cha Dec 2016 #93
Because she was such a strong candidate, it was vital she have no real competition Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #41
You got it. Makes sense in Bizarro world. JudyM Dec 2016 #44
A candidate that is besmirching the entire party and it's members who vote "estabishment" boston bean Dec 2016 #103
Thats certainly one narrative. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #107
It was his never ending and still ongoing criticisms of the party boston bean Dec 2016 #108
If you think we should have a rule excluding independents from running in our primaries, Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #171
You'd prefer left-leaning members of our coalition ran as third parties? Gore1FL Dec 2016 #118
Yeah i would since many seem to think it would draw republican white middle class voters. boston bean Dec 2016 #120
What? Help me understand... Yurovsky Dec 2016 #122
What i am saying is the argument for bernie was his ability to speak to white workong class. boston bean Dec 2016 #123
Working Class had been historically good for the Democrats. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #137
Hillary won the working class. but hey, we can all pretend she didn't.... boston bean Dec 2016 #139
Dividing the left up tp protect weak candidates is a losing cause. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #142
Why divided who?? boston bean Dec 2016 #143
You are suggesting that the divisions on the left be represented by multiple parties instead of one. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #149
I prefer to win future elections over finding scapegoats for the last. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #134
what you call scapegoats and offer a lifeline to are what I call boston bean Dec 2016 #136
I voted for Sanders in the nomination phase and Clinton in the GE. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #138
None of the above. Why do you ask. We are discussing people who voted for trump m boston bean Dec 2016 #145
We are discussing closing out people on the left. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #150
I suggest you follow along in the thread. boston bean Dec 2016 #157
I have been. If you haven't noticed, I've been disagreeing with you on party building. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #166
This message was self-deleted by its author Gore1FL Dec 2016 #165
That's how it works in the U.S. We have 2 dominant parties and build our coalitions in advance. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #117
Quite frankly my dear, I didn't give two shits what Sanders did/does, except use our party like.... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2016 #164
I agree. I think there should be a period of at least three years beforehand where you have to be stevenleser Dec 2016 #161
And returned to the US Senate, not as a Democrat, but as an Independent. I don't get it. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2016 #163
This message was self-deleted by its author LongtimeAZDem Dec 2016 #36
No problem with what you say, just ready to move on. The Primary is over, the election is over. We Alekzander Dec 2016 #39
This is the Postmortem Forum Blue Shoes Dec 2016 #48
If we don't figure out how we fucked up this time Crunchy Frog Dec 2016 #79
I know, big mistakes were made & we must learn what they are to avoid them in the future. Actually, Alekzander Dec 2016 #111
It wasn't just about Hillary. NanceGreggs Dec 2016 #47
But, but...the most vetted candidate in history wasn't vetted enough! TwilightZone Dec 2016 #55
How would vetting foretell Comey violating the Hatch Act twice with unprecedented letters? SunSeeker Dec 2016 #87
Sorry, I was being sarcastic. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #119
Hillary was in charge of her campaign and her loss is her own. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #57
We'll never know ... NanceGreggs Dec 2016 #59
A party that can't handle criticism in politics? Might as well complain about poo at the zoo. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #61
Sander's strategy was a huge political fail.. JHan Dec 2016 #72
Lying about what? NanceGreggs Dec 2016 #74
Well, aren't you cute. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #75
You accused me of "lying" ... NanceGreggs Dec 2016 #77
Thanks Nance.. That's right. Hillary nor Obama did not say the Dem Cha Dec 2016 #65
Ah, a gun control graphic. How fitting. appal_jack Dec 2016 #73
Didn't Trump say "Vote for me, and I'll fix the GOP?" MADem Dec 2016 #62
Yes, he did. NanceGreggs Dec 2016 #68
This election was not about Hillary or Sanders Frances Dec 2016 #49
And whether our democracy would fail or not. hay rick Dec 2016 #64
Sorry, but Sanders was never a member of "the party" until.... George II Dec 2016 #50
Jesus Christ. How many votes do you think he would have pulled in the GE had he run 3rd party. JCanete Dec 2016 #88
This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Dec 2016 #97
I must have missed the part of the 2008 primary where Hillary, as her campaign burned around her,... SaschaHM Dec 2016 #51
Many don't want to admit to this though.. JHan Dec 2016 #66
Wait...was that an ad against democrats? Is that what you heard? That is an ad against our system. JCanete Dec 2016 #85
That's all well and good as long as people see the whole picture..not just what the media wants you judesedit Dec 2016 #56
It's a cruel world out there. hay rick Dec 2016 #60
Get real. Being "primaried" has never made any incumbent stronger, pnwmom Dec 2016 #63
Never? Get real. It made Obama stronger in 2008. He rocketed out of there and into the GE. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #67
Obama was a newcomer, not a known quantity like Hillary or an incumbent. pnwmom Dec 2016 #70
Ah, so never, but with a bunch of exceptions for every time you're wrong. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #76
Obama wasn't an exception. Don't you understand? In the 2008 campaign pnwmom Dec 2016 #80
Ah, I had assumed "incumbent" was a typo, seeing as we didn't have any this year. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #159
In terms of being a high profile, very well known and qualified candidate, pnwmom Dec 2016 #167
Incumbent means incumbent, not whatever you declare it to mean at your convenience. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #173
SoS is not the POTUS... Yurovsky Dec 2016 #95
K & R SammyWinstonJack Dec 2016 #69
Jerry Brown totally damaged (Bill) Clinton in '92. Tatiana Dec 2016 #78
She had way too many skeletons in the closet FreakinDJ Dec 2016 #81
She was 9 points ahead in the polls before James Comey pnwmom Dec 2016 #94
This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Dec 2016 #98
And some of them weren't fictitious. Orsino Dec 2016 #140
That's a ridiculous analogy, sorry. ucrdem Dec 2016 #83
Hillary did win the primaries DFW Dec 2016 #92
Then you must wasn't the opp research file on Sanders released BainsBane Dec 2016 #99
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #100
She used nothing BainsBane Dec 2016 #101
Ah, the good old bullshitfirehose approach. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #104
Well, you confirm my point BainsBane Dec 2016 #106
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #131
Paragraph 1 score: -13 points. I did not read the rest. Better luck next time. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #158
You just perfectly described yourself. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #121
A candidate who runs a divisive bitter primary in an important year electorally...and lose the Demsrule86 Dec 2016 #102
That's absurd. Hell, every election is "The most important bla bla of our lifetime!" hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #105
With this post here, you seem to think DJT is just fine and dandy boston bean Dec 2016 #110
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Dec 2016 #116
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Dec 2016 #115
That does sound pretty dumb. I sure am glad I'm not the one saying it. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #160
So after the primary, the party should have nominated someone other than Hillary Clinton? liberal N proud Dec 2016 #126
This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Dec 2016 #129
For what? liberal N proud Dec 2016 #168
This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Dec 2016 #153
Usually, Democrats don't attack each other this much Nonhlanhla Dec 2016 #141
Bernie ran a negative campaign against Clinton portlander23 Dec 2016 #151
Here is a link for your reflection Nonhlanhla Dec 2016 #156
This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Dec 2016 #152
Agreed 100% Arazi Dec 2016 #144
Oh bullshit ismnotwasm Dec 2016 #146
And a Candidate that cannot win a primary also has no business anywhere NEAR A GE bravenak Dec 2016 #147
Sanders insulted the donor class. alarimer Dec 2016 #154
A candidate who lost by millions has no business anywhere near the GE. nt. NCTraveler Dec 2016 #162
So what we need to do is let the primary loser run Progressive dog Dec 2016 #170
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A candidate that gets "da...»Reply #53