Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
8. In actuality
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 05:43 PM
Dec 2012

Alaska was founded as a Democratic state back in 1959. In fact, Eisenhower was against statehood because he was afraid Democratic representation from AK would shift the balance in the US Senate. At the time HI was Republican. This is why the two states were admitted at roughly the same time. We sent several great democrats to Washington - Ernest Gruening, Bob Bartlett, Nick Begich, and my personal fave, Mike Gravel. We have one of the most liberal/progressive state constitutions in the country, had civil rights laws 20 years before the 1965 Civil Rights Act. Abortion was legal here before the Lower 48 and MJ has been virtually decriminalized since a court decision in 1975.

What has poisoned Alaska's politics was oil development and the arrival here of so many Texans and Oklahomans in the late '70s and early '80s. Carpetbaggers, we call them. Frankly, my hope is that with the increased development in North Dakota and other cheaper to get to oil resources in the Lower 48, maybe Exxon, BP and ConocoPhillips will give us our state back. I would happily give up my permanent fund dividend and pay state income taxes just to get them out of here.

There's people in Alaska? Arkana Dec 2012 #1
About 723,000 according to latest figures Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #2
If I remember my geography, you guys have the second-lowest population density of all 50 states. Arkana Dec 2012 #9
We have 1.8 according to that fact sheet. Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #10
wouldn't it be terrific if Alaska went blue in 2016 -- only 8 years after you betcha!! Filibuster Harry Dec 2012 #3
if we could move 200K californians there for the election, mission accomplished nt msongs Dec 2012 #4
Awful analysis by Silver. geek tragedy Dec 2012 #5
Thanks for the vote of confidence. Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #6
I grew up in North Dakota. Rural, non-diverse, cold states geek tragedy Dec 2012 #7
In actuality Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #8
In 1959, the Democrats were the party of segregationists. geek tragedy Dec 2012 #11
Whatever. Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #12
Sure, I can read. And how people voted in 1959 is quite irrelevant geek tragedy Dec 2012 #13
Alaska... pbrower2a Dec 2012 #24
You missed Nate's point cire41 Dec 2012 #15
Thank you for "getting it" Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #17
Statistical noise. geek tragedy Dec 2012 #18
You are ignoring Perot's effect in both races cire41 Dec 2012 #19
That's a whopping trend, alright Hekate Dec 2012 #20
While you will never see a Ted Kennedy liberal coming out of Alaska, you guys madinmaryland Dec 2012 #14
And before the gerrymandering we had a 50-50 split in our state senate, Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #16
So is Begich going to be re-elected as Senator in 2014? ellisonz Dec 2012 #21
Not certain. Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #22
Swing state? That would take a few years. Like maybe. Maybe 100 years. LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #23
Kick! sarcasmo Dec 2012 #25
We are a solid purple state. Arctic Dave Dec 2012 #26
I agree, Dave Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #28
I think Nate Silver is right. David__77 Dec 2012 #27
Campaiging in Alaska would be a big chore bluestateguy Dec 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Alaska: Future Swing Stat...»Reply #8