Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
9. You can attack those that disagree with your point of view,
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 06:01 PM
Nov 2012

but you have to ask why these two people would say anything at all unless they had concerns. What exactly does Doud and Milbanks gain by going on the record and questioning Rice's record? I fail to see what they gain by writing what they have about Rice. Are their points of view, racist and sexist too? Are they being honest or just trying to stir up some more controversy? Frankly, I am beginning to think Rice might have some baggage we should be concerned about. Just saying.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Susan Rice’s cowardly cri...»Reply #9