Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
22. Thank you for that. I have always thought that exit polls were a highly
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 01:57 PM
Nov 2012

reliable indicator of actual votes (hence my suspicions). But that depends on every citizen engaging in good faith, not the rat-fucking stuff advocated by Limpballs and his cohort.

My main reason to doubt the 'Vote Machine Hackers' and their various theories is the results of 2008 and 2012. If the hackers were as all-powerful as theorized, why would Obama have won both times out? I've never seen a convincing explanation of this from the pro-hacker crowd (hence my continuing agnosticism).

Still mindful of Stalin's witticism, though, that "he who casts a vote decides nothing. He who counts the vote decides everything."

I love how most rethugs AlGoreRhythms Nov 2012 #1
Go over to Free Republic, the morons there are screaming VOTER MACHINE FRAUD!!!!!! RomneyLies Nov 2012 #2
How can you say it's a fraud? Stevepol Nov 2012 #3
I say it's a fraud because it's a fraud RomneyLies Nov 2012 #7
You need to review the last 8-12 years of DU before making this kind of statement. unc70 Nov 2012 #4
Well, apparently you know more than the Obama campaign... brooklynite Nov 2012 #6
I wish I could rec an individual post RomneyLies Nov 2012 #10
That doesn't mean it never occurred. I trust the computer scientists at Princeton U. and elsewhere pnwmom Nov 2012 #12
I don't give a shit about the last 8-12 years of DU RomneyLies Nov 2012 #8
I stand by what I said unc70 Nov 2012 #14
Thanks for the update. Change has come Nov 2012 #5
Not a problem, n/t RomneyLies Nov 2012 #9
Sexier to fear machines than voter suppression Awsi Dooger Nov 2012 #11
Precisely RomneyLies Nov 2012 #17
It was certainly part of the Ohio 2004 cover-up Coyotl Nov 2012 #13
Your post marions ghost Nov 2012 #15
I want the experts to take a look at the machines and the system. Sunlei Nov 2012 #16
Your post is a major FAIL Impious Nov 2012 #18
The proof is in the polling. Polling prior to the election called Ohio DEAD ON! RomneyLies Nov 2012 #19
I count myself agnostic on this issue. Might I just ask a question about 2004? I have coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #20
Those who conducted the exit polls explained it best themselves RomneyLies Nov 2012 #21
Thank you for that. I have always thought that exit polls were a highly coalition_unwilling Nov 2012 #22
And Allen West would still be in the House if vote hacking was real. RomneyLies Nov 2012 #23
Maybe RW fixers told a few RW radio hosts to tell their listeners to answer exit polls incorrectly. John1956PA Nov 2012 #25
Oh come off it. You're pulling the typical conspiracy theorist ruse! RomneyLies Nov 2012 #26
If Rush told listeners to lie in exit polls, other states would have seen discrepancies like Ohio's John1956PA Nov 2012 #27
Read the article I posted above RomneyLies Nov 2012 #28
As predicted, the wing nuts are latching onto "electronic vote fraud" to explain how they lost RomneyLies Nov 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»My vote for the biggest g...»Reply #22