Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
3. I have to disagree.
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 12:45 PM
Aug 2016

Last edited Mon Aug 29, 2016, 01:39 PM - Edit history (2)

False equivalency arises when a RWer says or does something untoward, sending the media into a frenzy to find evidence on the left side of the aisle for acting in the same untoward way.

I think it's obvious that that is what is going on. And it's a one-way street. Otherwise, you'd see the media expressing outrage over the e-mail habits of Colin Powell and Condi Rice as a balance to their vendetta against Hillary. You would be hearing about the 22-million e-mails Rove had deleted every time someone mentions all of the emails Hillary has turned over.

But you don't hear any of that. You hear them treating everything Hillary does as a unique and unprecedented violation of the public trust, whereas anything questionable done by a RW is framed as "both sides of the aisle do it."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Do You Think Most D Voter...»Reply #3