Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: So when are Wikileaks, Anonymous, and others going to expose the Republicans? [View all]revbones
(3,660 posts)139. What statement did I make in this conversation tearing down any democrat?
Just because someone doesn't like hypocrisy, doesn't mean you can attribute such things to them.
I'm sorry if you are so enamored with team politics that you will excuse any misdeed on your own team, rather than at least be incensed enough to want to clean up your own team and live up to the higher ideals it espouses. I'd like the party to be better, so I don't excuse misdeeds quite as easily as some.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
188 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So when are Wikileaks, Anonymous, and others going to expose the Republicans? [View all]
Onlooker
Jul 2016
OP
Only crazy people think Clinton won the nomination because of election fraud.
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#25
Pretty much the majority of your statements since you joined a couple months ago.
JTFrog
Jul 2016
#141
Bull fuckin shit, that's standard position of both parties when one candidate has a statistical
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#24
red herring, She had the primary locked by may 5th SOP to plan to support the winning candidate
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#130
I don't think it was any secret that Clinton was more favored by party apparatchiks. nt
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#35
if they conducted their jobs in a way that clearly slanted the primary race in favor of
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#39
Tough being neutral when from day one of his announcement Bernie's campaign staff was raining sh&t
Fla Dem
Jul 2016
#131
Okay, there is absolutely zero evidence of any kind that Sanders would have done appreciably better
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#36
Commondreams is a pro bernie site. When is the last time they praised HRC & the Dems for anything?
misterhighwasted
Jul 2016
#129
It's always the privileged 'creative destructors' who seem to find Russia so 'easy on the eyes'.
randome
Jul 2016
#27
Unless they go after the GOP too they are just tools of the far Right & not anarchists.
Hekate
Jul 2016
#79
Indeed...WHEN? Why the obsession with Dems? Hum? Perfect mic drop moment...
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#14
Perhaps because the Democratic narrative is we are supposed to take the higher road.
avaistheone1
Jul 2016
#18
Riiiiiiiight. Therefore, the revolting Repubs deserve and get a pass. Makes perfect sense...NOT!
Surya Gayatri
Jul 2016
#23
Republican ignorance and savagery is transparent and on full display. There is not much left to the
avaistheone1
Jul 2016
#40
Isn't it interesting that Wikileaks has no documents to absolve Julian Assange?
brooklynite
Jul 2016
#41
every time I read posts like this it's usually followed by a post about Trump running on fear
Press Virginia
Jul 2016
#65
Republicans put their sins and crimes in their platform and every piece of legislation
yurbud
Jul 2016
#81
Others are more evil and corrupt, we don't want the negative attention to be brought to us.
insta8er
Jul 2016
#96
My reaction is not about her supporters, it's about the powerful people in this party, and the DNC.
vintx
Jul 2016
#113
Sen WELLSTONE was the great democratic progressive that Sanders fought AGAINST on Sierra Blanca.
misterhighwasted
Jul 2016
#128
Do remember...most of these “impartial purist” leakers and leaker-backers are Libertarians...
LowerManhattanite
Jul 2016
#125
If it were the "hacker community" behind this, that would have already happened.
L. Coyote
Jul 2016
#159