Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
35. I sent an alert on the OP because the heading that the DNC 'rigged' the Primary for HRC
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 05:41 PM
Jun 2016

was not supported by the information in the thread itself or the link and that there has to be some standard for such accusations other than just posting malicious statements without any proof. I immediately received a DU email stating that I was alerting on a post that had already been alerted to, but so far, I haven't seen any further response from DU as to the results of review of any alert. There was a post further down that has hidden but that was not the OP post that I was alerting to. This is irresponsible. I hope the revised rules will up the standards for people making claims of 'rigging' which hasn't been proven or even alledged by someone from a credible source. If you tell a lie enough, it becomes the truth to many and DU should not allow itself to be used as a tool for spreading such unsubstantiated BS.

6/20/16 can't come fast enoughto DU Botany Jun 2016 #1
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #2
you can do that right now. Why wait? wyldwolf Jun 2016 #4
Causing I'd rather stick with my buds til the end. kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #13
.... Scurrilous Jun 2016 #16
Plus I'd rather harp and belittle like you guys do, just to be an irritant like you guys are. kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #21
I think he just did. Such erudition! Such pathos! Squinch Jun 2016 #39
I voted for and supported Bernie in OH Botany Jun 2016 #6
It does make me feel better, knowing I will be on the right side of history. kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #15
Yep, making history being the runner-up to the first woman nominee of the Dem party. brush Jun 2016 #28
Being "the first woman" is all that matters... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #65
It wasn't that close — 57% - 43%. brush Jun 2016 #67
The asterisk next to his name will be on the right: Bernie Sanders *. randome Jun 2016 #29
Go ahead and ignore the well document election fraud. That doesn't change reality. bjo59 Jun 2016 #57
Yet he will get the policies he cares about on the... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #66
Bernie will be long-forgotten, and already is forgotten by most Americans. What BreakfastClub Jun 2016 #51
after the 50+ recs SirBrockington Jun 2016 #7
Two more days DesertRat Jun 2016 #20
You do realize Bernie Sanders is still in the race and is still a candidate? -none Jun 2016 #55
Why are you posting this to me? DesertRat Jun 2016 #56
Then why the Reply title, "Two more Days?" -none Jun 2016 #59
Again, you posted to the wrong person DesertRat Jun 2016 #62
That's what he just said greiner3 Jun 2016 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author DesertRat Jun 2016 #71
Holy crap. You guys really are trolling us now, aren't you? randome Jun 2016 #3
It's your prerogative to not care about corruption TheFarseer Jun 2016 #11
Do you listen to yourselves? Ever? The documents are either fake or completely disproven! randome Jun 2016 #12
I've never even heard of these documents before this thread TheFarseer Jun 2016 #19
But no one is saying that isn't important. randome Jun 2016 #23
Your purity is dazzling. But, to use your argument tactic, when did you stop beating your wife? Squinch Jun 2016 #41
How is that analogous to what we are talking about? TheFarseer Jun 2016 #45
Well, read through your own post again a few times. You'll see it. Eventually. Squinch Jun 2016 #46
I guess I just don't think of domestic violence as a joke. TheFarseer Jun 2016 #48
And again, when did you stop beating your wife? Squinch Jun 2016 #49
Lol TheFarseer Jun 2016 #50
See this: "Loaded Question". It is a logical fallacy. emulatorloo Jun 2016 #60
Wow! Thank you for this. I just didn't have the patience! Squinch Jun 2016 #68
Ouch sheshe2 Jun 2016 #64
Heh! Thanks for the information. Squinch Jun 2016 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #5
did we really land on the moon? stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #8
Nope. It was Trenton. Squinch Jun 2016 #42
I'm waiting for Guccifer to release Hillary's TPP emails 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #9
Tell us why you voted for someone as dumb as Bernie Sanders? brooklynite Jun 2016 #10
Bernie Sanders is not dumb bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #26
Well, then, you better deliver this "evidence" to him right quick... brooklynite Jun 2016 #30
How is OK to use Donald Trump's son-in-law's newspaper as a source? oberliner Jun 2016 #14
Guccifer? apcalc Jun 2016 #17
Guccifer? Botany Jun 2016 #24
This is Guccifer2, not the same hacker as Guccifer. emulatorloo Jun 2016 #58
Raging anti-semitic illuminati loon says what? Scurrilous Jun 2016 #18
Don't you see? It's all nonsense...until it isn't. Juicy_Bellows Jun 2016 #22
YOU NEVER REALLY LOVED HER!!! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #25
Any thing re: HRC that is said on this forum is severely attacked by those with H's and Arrows bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #27
MONDAY MFM008 Jun 2016 #31
None of that establishes any "rigging" BainsBane Jun 2016 #32
Nailed it! K&R redstateblues Jun 2016 #34
I sent an alert on the OP because the heading that the DNC 'rigged' the Primary for HRC politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2016 #35
I alerted on another post using the same redstateblues Jun 2016 #36
Eliz Warren vs Scott Brown - a race sans PACS nobody ever mentions stuffmatters Jun 2016 #33
As if we needed him to tell us they were rigged. . .. . pdsimdars Jun 2016 #37
This bullshit doesn't in fact "reveal" anything about primaries being "rigged." Lord Magus Jun 2016 #38
Most celebrity masturbatory fantasies are more realistic than this nonsense. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #40
A circle of clowns. randome Jun 2016 #43
If I ... JoePhilly Jun 2016 #44
Guccifer 2.0 stuff is pretty obviously manipulated to me. Why is the name of the SENDER cut off? emulatorloo Jun 2016 #61
. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #47
You know why Hillary won? Because more Democrats voted for her than for Sanders. Beacool Jun 2016 #52
ha ha . Its the observer website. Waiting for H. A. Goodman next! riversedge Jun 2016 #53
Ok so I must be stupid, because the okieinpain Jun 2016 #54
This ranks right up there with Birtherism for sheer CT nuttiness Hekate Jun 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Guccifer 2.0 Leak Reveals...»Reply #35