Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
49. Or, you can provide me a link so that I know we're working with the same analysis/report ...
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 03:43 PM
Jun 2016

But that said ...


So now we have not one, but TWO voting integrity folks raising alarms,


No ... What I have is a link to a reddit post that says: "Election Integrity Project: 'We have never seen such widespread mismanagement or manipulation of the voter rolls'."



and provides a link to the Election Integrity Project's website:

There {sic} website is here. https://www.electionintegrityproject.com/


But, I haven't been able to find the EIP statement on the website ... AND, the website does seem to have been up-dated since September 8th, 2015.

(maybe, you'll have better luck)

And, I have you telling me what Common Sense says ... and telling me to look it up!

I do, I do. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #1
As a journalist, have you heard reports/complaints of vote "mismanagement/manipulation" ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #3
Perfect! Great question ... excellent phrasing ... deserving of a response. Well done! NurseJackie Jun 2016 #6
Call-out of another DUer by requesting info you know will not be forthcoming. randome Jun 2016 #8
Actually, it was a sincere question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #12
And as I explained bellow Common Cause also noticed the same exact pattern nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #20
But 1SBM asked what reports you personally have heard. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #106
It was a smart question in more ways than one. It's natural for people not to question Cal33 Jun 2016 #125
You're being sarcastic, right? Why should 1SBM know the poster won't answer? n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #105
Yes, it was sarcastic. randome Jun 2016 #115
My beat is San Diego (I think we are in California, perhaps I am mistaken) nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #9
It was a sincere question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #11
"No" nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #15
Common Cause saw the same pattern nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #18
That doesn't answer the question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #24
Public Records Request, and I am sure the SOS will hate it nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #33
And yet, besides the ambiguous "Common Sense" reference ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #39
Common Cause, you can go look it up nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #41
Or, you can provide me a link so that I know we're working with the same analysis/report ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #49
Or I can not do that work for you nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #50
Okay ... That's a strange position for a journalist to take ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #54
What not to want to engage with somebody who asked a question that I do not think is sincere nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #55
LOL ... Okay ... LOL 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #56
Yup funny, how far we have gone nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #58
What does my "good faith" have to do with YOU providing a source for YOUR assertion? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #60
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #62
My "fucking proof" ... wouldn't that be your "fucking proof", presumably supportive of ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #67
Nah you can think what you want nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #68
I know the Protect the Vote people and have spoken at a couple of their events Gothmog Jun 2016 #95
Thank you for your good work ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #98
I am part of the Victory Counsel program for Clinton that requires you to be licensed Gothmog Jun 2016 #99
Please send me the contact info. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #101
Your "Proof" is a fund raising email ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #71
I am embarrassed for you...to be so blind nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #73
Please, don't be. You don't have any embarrassment to spare. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #84
"...A curious position for a journalist to take." Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #117
The STANDARD Answer Here Is To Ask FOR A LINK... ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #119
Or, people ask for links because so much that appears on the internet, and DU (of late) ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #120
EIP is also a Tea Party group like True the Vote WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #51
And I am positive common cause is too? nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #57
That is quite an imagination you have. I didn't say a word about common cause. WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #63
Yup I got quite the imagination nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #64
Okay ... This is just nuts ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #66
That was EASILY the most embarrassing dismantling I've ever seen here. Well done Number23 Jun 2016 #81
Do absolutely nothing, that is the best way to act nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #82
Interesting ... I didn't know that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #59
And, to review, in the end there was NO credible source about ANY election fraud. Anywhere. Squinch Jun 2016 #83
I was too tired to close that loop. Thanks. And, to answer my seminal question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #86
But something caused a riot in 1943, too. Squinch Jun 2016 #87
Nope ... it was President Obama secret ambition to cut Social Security ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #91
My head is spinning! My stomach feels all iggidy! Squinch Jun 2016 #92
But what did you see or hear or become aware of, in your professional capacity pnwmom Jun 2016 #107
Do you have a link to the "report"? Was it a Face-book screen shot? Or, Reddit? 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #116
It was here, on DU. pnwmom Jun 2016 #124
They don't care now, but will care when the Republicans do it. That's a right wing mentality. Right GoneFishin Jun 2016 #13
Not right wing, PARTISAN nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #19
I actually do see hypocrisy as a generally right wing trait. And I do consider people who call GoneFishin Jun 2016 #27
On this one it is just partisan nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #31
Ok. No problem. GoneFishin Jun 2016 #34
I'll take a gander... I am going to say NO, in the states that Sanders won, we did NOT see... Raster Jun 2016 #25
I wasn't "phishing" for an answer ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #30
You might not like my answer since it will be seen as partisan nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #32
I'm curious how answering that question would be seen as partisan? 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #38
Anything I post is seen as partisan nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #40
Curiouser ... I don't recall EVER discussing the 1943 L.A. riots with you ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #47
Curious that you do not know the history of how we actually got to 1994 nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #48
Okay ... This is really getting weird. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #53
Looks like PepperHarlan Jun 2016 #114
Just as well ... I had reached my daily victim-creation quota ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #121
My apologies, these days on DU it's a bit difficult to determine the sincere questions... Raster Jun 2016 #35
Thanks ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #44
There could be many other responses. Raster Jun 2016 #46
I would too ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #52
Ultimately 1SBM, I think we (as a Party and as a Country) need to make sure... Raster Jun 2016 #69
Oh, Raster ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #72
I disagree. Questions were raised about the fairness and equality of the Democratic primary... Raster Jun 2016 #74
Sme of us have raised questions since 2000 nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #76
I heartily concur. Selection 2000 should have been our "wake up and smell the coffee" moment... Raster Jun 2016 #77
Exactly nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #79
"That poster" asked a question that was never answered. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #90
The thing is, nobody in power gave a shit. Fuddnik Jun 2016 #102
Interesting ... Did you retain any of what you uncovered ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #123
True that. Since 2,000 I've blasted the DNC in all-caps for knowingly letting it to go on, ancianita Jun 2016 #88
I don't know what you are referring to here ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #85
Almost all the purported problems came from people who had incorrectly pnwmom Jun 2016 #111
Election protection and election law is one of my areas Gothmog Jun 2016 #93
Would this ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2016 #2
Why do people only complain about elections IN THE MIDST of elections? DetlefK Jun 2016 #4
See post 102 above. Fuddnik Jun 2016 #103
I have never seen such widespread problems with voter registration rolls. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #5
Democrats did nothing about what happened in 2000 when they had the chance. corkhead Jun 2016 #10
exactly J_J_ Jun 2016 #22
New Democrats do anyway. nt valerief Jun 2016 #29
"those" people Dem2 Jun 2016 #122
Republicans had a closed primary and only one candidate still in the race. pnwmom Jun 2016 #108
Not every state was close and one candidate. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #110
The OP and discussion here is about California. Have you closely studied pnwmom Jun 2016 #112
Seeing as NPP voters are not in fact requried to vote with provisional ballot, this seems to be BS. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #7
You apparently have low information about what happened. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #14
That is true. The state didnt' read their mind to know they wanted a Dem ballot. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #16
Or the state ignored what they said. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #17
No, you have incorrect information Retrograde Jun 2016 #26
Your information is just as 'low." Republicans had a closed primary open only to R's. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #109
From my niece who lives in CA. Jennylynn Jun 2016 #21
I had to repeat the words cross over ballots twice nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #23
Maybe someone from The Guardian will look into this. We certainly don't expect U.S. "journalists" to valerief Jun 2016 #28
So will Hill fans call the Election Integrity Project "Conspiracy Theorists?" senz Jun 2016 #36
Maybe you should do a little reading on them WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #42
We have group like in Texas called True the Vote Gothmog Jun 2016 #96
How about Tea Party activists? Il_Coniglietto Jun 2016 #43
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #37
You realize that is a tea party group? Related to True the Vote WhollyHeretic Jun 2016 #45
The Voting Rights Act was just gutted recently gollygee Jun 2016 #61
They are ok with it as long as they can do that to people like me and you nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #65
Thread Winner! Raster Jun 2016 #70
It will get worse until we have a constitutional RIGHT to vote Ferd Berfel Jun 2016 #75
Needed for the Constitution: Raster Jun 2016 #78
The full second bill of rights nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #80
Not direct manipulation of the polls but this video is interesting regards google search. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #89
Thanks. Interesting. 840high Jun 2016 #104
HUGE NEWS IN THIS VIDEO: LAWSUITS BEING FILED... kadaholo Jun 2016 #94
That lawsuit appears to be based on some wild CT based on exit polls being 100% accurate Gothmog Jun 2016 #97
Funny... kadaholo Jun 2016 #100
I watched the sad and silly party of the video discussing the lawsuit Gothmog Jun 2016 #118
Reminder: Exit Poll Conspiracy Theories Are Totally Baseless creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #113
Elections are not the results of exit polls in which a different answer can be provided than Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #126
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Election Integrity Projec...»Reply #49