Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Election Integrity Project: "We have never seen such widespread mismanagement or manipulation of the [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)49. Or, you can provide me a link so that I know we're working with the same analysis/report ...
But that said ...
So now we have not one, but TWO voting integrity folks raising alarms,
No ... What I have is a link to a reddit post that says: "Election Integrity Project: 'We have never seen such widespread mismanagement or manipulation of the voter rolls'."
and provides a link to the Election Integrity Project's website:
There {sic} website is here. https://www.electionintegrityproject.com/
But, I haven't been able to find the EIP statement on the website ... AND, the website does seem to have been up-dated since September 8th, 2015.
(maybe, you'll have better luck)
And, I have you telling me what Common Sense says ... and telling me to look it up!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
126 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Election Integrity Project: "We have never seen such widespread mismanagement or manipulation of the [View all]
J_J_
Jun 2016
OP
As a journalist, have you heard reports/complaints of vote "mismanagement/manipulation" ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#3
Perfect! Great question ... excellent phrasing ... deserving of a response. Well done!
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#6
And as I explained bellow Common Cause also noticed the same exact pattern
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#20
It was a smart question in more ways than one. It's natural for people not to question
Cal33
Jun 2016
#125
You're being sarcastic, right? Why should 1SBM know the poster won't answer? n/t
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#105
My beat is San Diego (I think we are in California, perhaps I am mistaken)
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#9
Or, you can provide me a link so that I know we're working with the same analysis/report ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#49
What not to want to engage with somebody who asked a question that I do not think is sincere
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#55
What does my "good faith" have to do with YOU providing a source for YOUR assertion? ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#60
My "fucking proof" ... wouldn't that be your "fucking proof", presumably supportive of ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#67
I am part of the Victory Counsel program for Clinton that requires you to be licensed
Gothmog
Jun 2016
#99
Or, people ask for links because so much that appears on the internet, and DU (of late) ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#120
That is quite an imagination you have. I didn't say a word about common cause.
WhollyHeretic
Jun 2016
#63
That was EASILY the most embarrassing dismantling I've ever seen here. Well done
Number23
Jun 2016
#81
And, to review, in the end there was NO credible source about ANY election fraud. Anywhere.
Squinch
Jun 2016
#83
I was too tired to close that loop. Thanks. And, to answer my seminal question ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#86
Nope ... it was President Obama secret ambition to cut Social Security ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#91
Do you have a link to the "report"? Was it a Face-book screen shot? Or, Reddit?
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#116
They don't care now, but will care when the Republicans do it. That's a right wing mentality. Right
GoneFishin
Jun 2016
#13
I actually do see hypocrisy as a generally right wing trait. And I do consider people who call
GoneFishin
Jun 2016
#27
I'll take a gander... I am going to say NO, in the states that Sanders won, we did NOT see...
Raster
Jun 2016
#25
Curiouser ... I don't recall EVER discussing the 1943 L.A. riots with you ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#47
Curious that you do not know the history of how we actually got to 1994
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#48
My apologies, these days on DU it's a bit difficult to determine the sincere questions...
Raster
Jun 2016
#35
I disagree. Questions were raised about the fairness and equality of the Democratic primary...
Raster
Jun 2016
#74
I heartily concur. Selection 2000 should have been our "wake up and smell the coffee" moment...
Raster
Jun 2016
#77
True that. Since 2,000 I've blasted the DNC in all-caps for knowingly letting it to go on,
ancianita
Jun 2016
#88
Seeing as NPP voters are not in fact requried to vote with provisional ballot, this seems to be BS.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#7
That is true. The state didnt' read their mind to know they wanted a Dem ballot.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#16
Your information is just as 'low." Republicans had a closed primary open only to R's. n/t
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#109
Maybe someone from The Guardian will look into this. We certainly don't expect U.S. "journalists" to
valerief
Jun 2016
#28
They are ok with it as long as they can do that to people like me and you
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2016
#65
Not direct manipulation of the polls but this video is interesting regards google search.
PufPuf23
Jun 2016
#89
That lawsuit appears to be based on some wild CT based on exit polls being 100% accurate
Gothmog
Jun 2016
#97
Elections are not the results of exit polls in which a different answer can be provided than
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#126