2016 Postmortem

Skink

(10,122 posts)

20. HRC supporters will be at home watching Fox News at 5 Est instead of voting

Reply to DCBob (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 12:40 PM

Jun 2016

There goes the 3 million lead.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton camp: We'll win California in 'tight race' [View all] DCBob Jun 2016 OP

I think you are 100% correct. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1

It wouldn't surprise me to see Bernie take CA. calguy Jun 2016 #2

Republicans would have to have changed their registration back in May to vote in the Dem primary. upaloopa Jun 2016 #5

Thanks for setting me straight calguy Jun 2016 #9

The California Green Party lost about 30% of its voters Retrograde Jun 2016 #11

Many right-wing people I know in CA have always been registered NPP, to give them more flexibility eastwestdem Jun 2016 #62

a "R" can't vote in the Democratic primary Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #51

"no party preference" voters can vote in the democratic primary ContinentalOp Jun 2016 #57

Only if they changed their registrations. Non-affiliated can ask for a Democratic pnwmom Jun 2016 #69

I was at a Hillary rally in Oxnard, CA on Saturday and the primary was only upaloopa Jun 2016 #3

Clinton wins CA by 10-15 pts nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #4

I agree with you. I live on the Central Coast and students told me they are taking exams this week. upaloopa Jun 2016 #7

My daughter's in the San Fran area and tells me that everyone she knows pnwmom Jun 2016 #70

I think it will be a lot closer than that Retrograde Jun 2016 #12

Fingers crossed workinclasszero Jun 2016 #6

I thought exactly the same when I read that. auntpurl Jun 2016 #8

Yeah, I think something like 55-45 win for Hillary. DCBob Jun 2016 #32

A 60% drubbing by Sanders would be good enough LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #36

Benenson isn't a bullshitter either, dude sticks to the numbers nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #10

If Hillary has a slim win that is a huge loss. Seeinghope Jun 2016 #13

A huge loss for who? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #14

Hillary of course! Why would so many people vote for a loser? At this late stage in the game and Seeinghope Jun 2016 #25

Delusional nonsense, nothing more. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #27

Not at all! Truth is hard to deal with. Seeinghope Jun 2016 #37

Clearly it's hard for some people. Like you. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #41

Ha ha! All of these people voting for Bernie Sanders making it such a "tight" race when Hillary Cli Seeinghope Jun 2016 #42

It's not a tight race. It's a landslide. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #46

Did you forget to read the title of this thread? Seeinghope Jun 2016 #47

Did you forget this is a race for President of the United States, not President of California? -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #49

My comments were directed to the subject of the thread. Not the whole subject of the race for the Seeinghope Jun 2016 #50

When you are losing substantially... jcgoldie Jun 2016 #58

I am talking about California. Just California. If you want to drag other states into it Seeinghope Jun 2016 #63

Wow, ALREADY minimising her accomplishments? auntpurl Jun 2016 #16

It would be a huge loss for Bernie leftynyc Jun 2016 #17

In a "tight race". It would not be a huge loss for Bernie Sanders. It would put Hillary Clinton Seeinghope Jun 2016 #43

What would be pathetic leftynyc Jun 2016 #45

What is weak and corrupt is a candidate buying Super Delegates BEFORE even one vote is cast! Seeinghope Jun 2016 #48

LOL leftynyc Jun 2016 #60

My candidate, while possibly not becoming President of the United States. Would be a much better Seeinghope Jun 2016 #61

Yawn leftynyc Jun 2016 #68

Are you even serious? workinclasszero Jun 2016 #26

BernieMath - a slim win for Hillary = huge win for Bernie MariaThinks Jun 2016 #55

Nope. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #54

Any win would be huge. pnwmom Jun 2016 #71

I think so too. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #15

No, California doesn't matter nt firebrand80 Jun 2016 #19

Demographics have ruled thus far firebrand80 Jun 2016 #18

HRC supporters will be at home watching Fox News at 5 Est instead of voting Skink Jun 2016 #20

Right, because it's a Hillary love fest on Fox nt firebrand80 Jun 2016 #21

this is getting sad nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #24

Only one candidate has no problem with Fox News MadBadger Jun 2016 #29

Silly comment. DCBob Jun 2016 #33

I already faxed in my ballot from overseas SoCalNative Jun 2016 #52

It ain't Hillary supporters that seem to like watching Fox News. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #53

Jury results merrily Jun 2016 #59

Yup. Because they already mailed in their ballots. They were already pnwmom Jun 2016 #72

I have no doubt that the fix is in coyote Jun 2016 #22

of course, because it's just no possible that Bernie could ever lose, he's too dreamy nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #23

I think bernie supporters are giddy about coming in second. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #56

And exactly what "fix" might that be? MoonRiver Jun 2016 #28

She'll be making her victory speech after 1% of the vote has been calculated coyote Jun 2016 #35

Even if you are correct about Arizona, that is NOT a "fix." MoonRiver Jun 2016 #38

It's always a "fix" to you when Hillary wins, is it? Lord Magus Jun 2016 #30

Looks like I t was right afterall coyote Jun 2016 #67

Hill, YEEEESSSSSSSSS! K & R! Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #31

Woo Hoo! I'm chilling a bottle of good Montana wine in the fridge for tomorrow :-) Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #34

Sounds great.. I have a nice Bordeaux ready for the occasion. DCBob Jun 2016 #39

The popping of corks and tinging of glasses will abound! We're having a sweet huckleberry peach Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #40

California will be close. Close is a Clinton win, though. MineralMan Jun 2016 #44

Its funny the Berners are claiming that a close contest is somehow a big win for Bernie. DCBob Jun 2016 #64

I don't know. I just count delegates. MineralMan Jun 2016 #65

Yep.. totally agree. DCBob Jun 2016 #66

And don't forget New Jersey -- a small state with lots of delegates. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #73