2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie wants to throw Barney Frank and Dannel Malloy out of convention platform. [View all]edbermac
(15,970 posts)I was juror 3
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Sat May 28, 2016, 11:37 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Really? Is that the story you are going with?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2073320
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Accusing a poster of SMEARING anyone or anything is rude, especially when it is not true and all the poster is doing is expressing an opinion that the poster doesn't agree with. When the poster is called a "vomiter" because this person doesn't agree w/their opinion, that rises to the level of disruptive and hurtful. When the words IDIOTIC/UNINFORMED are added, we are in personal insult territory-this poster is calling a duer a person who pukes moronic ideas. It's name calling, it's insulting and abusive, it's aggressive and it stifles discussion. Disagree w/o being so disagreeable. This kind of conversation makes du suck.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat May 28, 2016, 11:42 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation:
OP is right, I remember those days LEAVE IT ALONE
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: He said the post was idiotic not the poster. Not a personal attack.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.