2016 Postmortem

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

189. I do not "trust" him in quotation marks either.

Fri May 27, 2016, 01:52 PM

May 2016

1) To this point I see zero reason for indictment.
2) Things are wrapping up and they have yet to call up a Grand Jury in the matter. A step I believe would have happened by now.
3) It isn't about trust in Comey to me. I think that is a strange metric that you are placing importance in.
4) Every Berner here has employed anti-Clinton rhetoric. I have employed anti-Clinton rhetoric. Who gives a shit?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

240 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Game Over: EmailGate Just Crippled the Clinton Express [View all] pinebox May 2016 OP

She's toast. lagomorph777 May 2016 #1

She will receive a full pardon from Obama if necessary. -nt- NorthCarolina May 2016 #221

Hillary Is Done! Get Out The Golden FORK! It's NOT Going To Be Pretty Here On Out... But IT Is... CorporatistNation May 2016 #222

How many times can she be toast? NCTraveler May 2016 #2

It's like all those predictions puffy socks May 2016 #37

Perhaps she's like Prometheus. Each day eagles nosh on her and the next morning she is regenerated. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #53

Lol were you in a coma in 2008? People were calling here toast, then, too. WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #62

Decades. Nt NCTraveler May 2016 #67

She's never been president. She ran once. It didn't go well for her. Toast. She's not president. WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #80

When did I ever say she was President? NCTraveler May 2016 #112

She's only got nine lives ... KPN May 2016 #71

The proclamation that it's over for her... NCTraveler May 2016 #76

Comey is getting a 2nd crack at her. Very rare opportunity for him. He's a repub. yodermon May 2016 #86

No, he will pull no punches. NCTraveler May 2016 #114

“a highly improper pattern of deliberate misconduct.” yodermon May 2016 #182

When did I say I trusted him? NCTraveler May 2016 #183

I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. yodermon May 2016 #187

I do not "trust" him in quotation marks either. NCTraveler May 2016 #189

He's an Obama appointee. HooptieWagon May 2016 #162

I've been hearing it on this site for at least nine months BainsBane May 2016 #96

She can be bernt toast. NV Whino May 2016 #124

Lol. Now you are just mocking Sanders supporters. NCTraveler May 2016 #133

The Bernouts know this is their only hope. JoePhilly May 2016 #142

If so, our hopes are rising. ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #165

Those hopes are about to hit a ceiling. JoePhilly May 2016 #186

Typical. Expectorated. And fitting, given the caliber of your candidate. ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #214

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #3

Welcome to DU... SidDithers May 2016 #6

Welcome to reality, Sid. R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #216

Oh look. The zombie was PPR'd again... SidDithers May 2016 #218

Oh, DU always is so real...especially with R. Daneel Olivaw May 2016 #237

Try again. Darb May 2016 #8

Wonder if Hill knows she's done. Who will tell her and when? yourpaljoey May 2016 #4

Nobody tells Hillary anything!! That is part of her problem. Hiraeth May 2016 #5

I think she still believes she will be President - how will she react when she finds out? yourpaljoey May 2016 #12

Hope there is plenty of Ativan on board. Hiraeth May 2016 #25

I wonder how poor Huma is going to break it to her... Bob41213 May 2016 #36

maybe she can be president of something else. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #68

Cell-block president ??? pdsimdars May 2016 #192

Naw, she'll get pardoned & be the President of Goldman Sachs... Yurovsky May 2016 #235

Time for an intervention? pdsimdars May 2016 #191

Cool story, bro. nt onehandle May 2016 #7

Yeah, real cool story. notadmblnd May 2016 #227

It's all over but the shouting One Black Sheep May 2016 #9

Cool story. But here is what is really going to happen. StevieM May 2016 #174

The only really accurate thing in that is your concluding sentence: leveymg May 2016 #204

for some reason this picture came to mind corkhead May 2016 #10

To a partisan maybe, Darb May 2016 #13

Have you seen her honestly ratings? Bob41213 May 2016 #23

You mean a "poll" of her honesty? Darb May 2016 #41

poll after poll, month after month, year after year. . . .it's her M O. pdsimdars May 2016 #194

That is hella photo! yourpaljoey May 2016 #16

Yeah puffy socks May 2016 #43

P E R F E C T !!! pdsimdars May 2016 #193

You should have given us a Pantload Alert on that one. Darb May 2016 #11

But mommy, _____ did it too. B Calm May 2016 #18

Please. Darb May 2016 #44

yeah...because no one would think to set up their own server Press Virginia May 2016 #57

You in her head too? Darb May 2016 #93

Who needs to be in her head? It's what happened. Press Virginia May 2016 #117

You know her intent? Darb May 2016 #123

yes. She put it in an e-mail. She was concerned about privacy. Press Virginia May 2016 #129

Says you, oh great and powerful swami. Darb May 2016 #134

No, she actually put it in an email. No "swami" needed. Schema Thing May 2016 #138

Ok, oh great and powerful. Now tell me, Darb May 2016 #140

No. Says the e-mail cited in the IG Report released on Tuesday. Press Virginia May 2016 #143

So you know her intent? Darb May 2016 #172

Does it change the fact that it exists? Nope Press Virginia May 2016 #185

In that astroturf thing of Brock, I wonder if people get paid for the NUMBER of comments pdsimdars May 2016 #197

Oh I'm done with him. I saw another one of these last night Press Virginia May 2016 #198

Plus, this one has a yellow button and I can see why passiveporcupine May 2016 #217

Here you go, perfect for you pdsimdars May 2016 #199

true - and it doesn't usually work for kids either -- not with me, not with my mom karynnj May 2016 #78

More partisan hackery. Darb May 2016 #88

So, saying that Kerry did the same before he was told it was illegal - when he did not is not smear? karynnj May 2016 #95

Another mind reader. Did you ever think that she might have been mistaken? Darb May 2016 #100

If she didn't know, she should not have made this accusation karynnj May 2016 #110

Accusation? Darb May 2016 #131

Kerry has dealt with the RW since 1971 - far longer than HRC nt karynnj May 2016 #136

Maybe. But I don't think to the same extent. Darb May 2016 #139

Hillary was a very obscure, very minor member of the watergate team - Kerry was front and center karynnj May 2016 #169

Ok, you win. Kerry has been badgered. Hillary hasn't? Darb May 2016 #177

What she intended to do was to avoid the legitimate scrutiny by the Congress and media karynnj May 2016 #184

Here's the problem with continuously saying she makes "Mistakes" Mother Of Four May 2016 #223

She doesn't want the inconvenience of carrying two devices XemaSab May 2016 #232

Even worse when blank is actually the lawless Bush junta. TheKentuckian May 2016 #233

4.....powell, rice, clinton, kerry Jack Bone May 2016 #20

Try again. Darb May 2016 #50

nope not SOS, but I did carry a TOP SECRET security clearance. Jack Bone May 2016 #79

She "could have"? Really? Darb May 2016 #85

secrecy....innit ironic? nt Jack Bone May 2016 #89

Not privacy? Darb May 2016 #103

there's no privacy for public officials...'specially doing public buisness! Jack Bone May 2016 #115

Is there something missing? Darb May 2016 #119

That's right, the wording should not be "may have", it should be "she did" notadmblnd May 2016 #231

When I worked for the gov't hollowdweller May 2016 #122

The government system is glacial when traveling the world 24/7? Darb May 2016 #135

In reality, HRC wants it to be also Powell, Rice, and Kerry karynnj May 2016 #55

Kerry came after. Albright was before it was integral, and quite frankly, Darb May 2016 #75

HRC apparently though Kerry relevant enough she lied about him karynnj May 2016 #91

That report means exactly jack squat. Darb May 2016 #97

sure..... jham123 May 2016 #141

A pass? The look forward coalition is now trying to blame liberals for a pass on the TheKentuckian May 2016 #236

thanx for clearing that up... Jack Bone May 2016 #83

Actually, it makes my case. Darb May 2016 #113

email is a "new" phenomena jham123 May 2016 #145

In a historical context, yes. Darb May 2016 #151

Historical? jham123 May 2016 #155

You are so smart. Maybe you should be President. Darb May 2016 #160

Not about me jham123 May 2016 #167

They all had private, unsecured servers? Matt_in_STL May 2016 #24

No, they used the RNC server, which is worse. Darb May 2016 #51

Which SOS used the RNC server? Matt_in_STL May 2016 #60

The entire Bush admin used the RNC server to keep their shit secret. Darb May 2016 #69

Oh, so it had nothing to do with what Hillary did. Matt_in_STL May 2016 #73

Pure partisan hackery. Darb May 2016 #107

When you've got nothing else, go personal. Matt_in_STL May 2016 #111

No, sorry, you are going with partisan hackery. Darb May 2016 #118

Partisan Hackery? jham123 May 2016 #150

Yes, partisan hackery at is bone-gnawing best. Darb May 2016 #157

WTH.... jham123 May 2016 #164

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #168

Hillary has done a fine...... jham123 May 2016 #176

Please don't be obtuse. Darb May 2016 #180

Now "I'm" the one being Obtuse?? jham123 May 2016 #181

No they didn't --- Rove and other people working on the 2006 election used the RNC karynnj May 2016 #102

If you say so. Darb May 2016 #108

Which one set up a server in their basement then claimed it had Press Virginia May 2016 #54

Uh, did she break the law? Or are you just getting the vapors? Darb May 2016 #61

We don't know yet. The FBI hasn't announce anything as of yet. What we DO KNOW Press Virginia May 2016 #72

More partisan hackery. Darb May 2016 #82

The IG specifically says there was no request by HRC to use a private server Press Virginia May 2016 #126

If you've got something to say, Darb May 2016 #144

I do.... jham123 May 2016 #153

Stay content in your ignorance Press Virginia May 2016 #154

Darb... Mother Of Four May 2016 #226

It's at a maximum...warning red. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #58

The report does not say that Kerry ignored protocols, it says that he FOLLOWED them karynnj May 2016 #63

EXACTLY! jham123 May 2016 #158

You know better than that. I know you do. merrily May 2016 #84

Oh, it's a pantload all right. Darb May 2016 #173

You know better than that. I know you do. merrily May 2016 #178

Y ah, and the rules never changed from Colin's time ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #170

Better go back and READ what the rerport actually said, pdsimdars May 2016 #195

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #14

sez you? corkhead May 2016 #22

Hey! That poster just joined this morning to make sure everyone knew where they belonged. Matt_in_STL May 2016 #28

Says the guy with 5 posts! lol pinebox May 2016 #27

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #32

And now he is the poster with zero posts. Matt_in_STL May 2016 #38

lol yup. pinebox May 2016 #49

Remember John Schindler, the conservative talking head, retired NSA spook, JTFrog May 2016 #15

Not to mention the publication in question is owned by Donald Trump's son-in-law oberliner May 2016 #26

That poster has dumped enough conservative right wing propaganda onto DU to JTFrog May 2016 #35

Yep...toast... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #17

I'm gonna wait until the FBI actually says something. apnu May 2016 #19

I agree apnu. saidsimplesimon May 2016 #109

Damn, when GoT gives us life lessons... we should be worried. (nt) apnu May 2016 #116

The source of this is a newspaper published by Donald Trump's son-in-law oberliner May 2016 #21

Link? I looked into the source and couldn't find anything? pinebox May 2016 #29

It's the fucking disclaimer at the end of the article? Did you read the article you posted? JTFrog May 2016 #39

The NY Observer is owned by Jared Kushner... SidDithers May 2016 #40

not much room at the top of the pyramid for either side. Hiraeth May 2016 #30

Well, either her campaign and career are over... Orsino May 2016 #31

What happens if Hillary gets indicted after she's nominated? left-of-center2012 May 2016 #33

She'd be impeached. pinebox May 2016 #46

Nominated, not elected, was the question. Darb May 2016 #52

Um what? mythology May 2016 #90

He said after she was elected pinebox May 2016 #94

You can only be impeached for alleged crimes committed while in office. Cali_Democrat May 2016 #209

It's so yesteryear aspirant May 2016 #34

Better believe it!...nt SidDithers May 2016 #42

Condi Rice didn't use email, if this ig believes that i have some nice trump vitamins for him MattP May 2016 #45

Even if she's toast, Bernie won't be nominee dcbuckeye May 2016 #47

The DNC oligarchy has already proven they are out to lose this election B Calm May 2016 #56

Can you tell us how the GOP will destroy Bernie? pinebox May 2016 #65

How about a 10X daily loop of Bernie promising to raise taxes on the middle class redstateblues May 2016 #120

Go for it. pinebox May 2016 #130

Bernie's the only one who can win it. What have you been smoking. pdsimdars May 2016 #200

Ok. zappaman May 2016 #48

Meh. Nothing will happen to her over it - not legally anyway . . . Triana May 2016 #59

+1 great post! B Calm May 2016 #66

Not the same. Watch this please. pinebox May 2016 #81

Tx for the info. Triana May 2016 #101

Welcome :) It's a helluva interview pinebox May 2016 #104

Wierd SwampG8r May 2016 #219

Even weirder SwampG8r May 2016 #220

Bizzaro world pinebox May 2016 #225

Hillary is the only SOS who had a private server. merrily May 2016 #106

Do you know the difference between a SERVER and an email ACCOUNT? pdsimdars May 2016 #203

Your sanctimonious, patronizing condencension is unnecessary Triana May 2016 #212

It was neither sanctimonious or patronizing. YOUR post indicated that you conflated them. pdsimdars May 2016 #238

Disclosure: Donald Trump is the father-in-law of Jared Kushner, the publisher of Observer Media. kwassa May 2016 #64

Wish I'd known that to begin with. Ugh. pinebox May 2016 #74

Well there you go. Triana May 2016 #121

I don't believe it but could you imagine if this egomaniac took down the entire country because she WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #70

Kickin' for the truth! Faux pas May 2016 #77

Unrec. Spreading Trump propaganda from Observer.com FSogol May 2016 #87

Thanks for the kick :) pinebox May 2016 #92

Your propaganda has a best if used by date of 6/14/16. Enjoy! FSogol May 2016 #98

I think you perhaps meant "your"? pinebox May 2016 #99

What happens then? We will no longer be allowed to scrutinize candidates? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #127

Yeah, only republicans will be able to scrutinize "our" candidate mindwalker_i May 2016 #159

Yep. Trump is well known for his gentle, courteous, demeanor. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #161

Oh man, you almost owed me a keyboard for that one! mindwalker_i May 2016 #171

pinebox, now come on buddy, get real, here's what I mean pdsimdars May 2016 #206

lemme see. Is this version #1348 or #1349 of the email saga that was supposed to sink Hillary? Sheepshank May 2016 #105

The train wreck was caused by an overloaded baggage car. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #125

good one Throd May 2016 #137

brilliant again pdsimdars May 2016 #205

"If you're winning and you know it then your face will surely show it" ucrdem May 2016 #128

Donald Trump's son in laws newspaper leftynyc May 2016 #132

Ask yourself that question and BNR & then we'll talk. pinebox May 2016 #148

Cherrypick? leftynyc May 2016 #163

Yes you're cherry picking. pinebox May 2016 #207

Linking to a Trump family member website is cheaper than sending donations directly to Trump ... JoePhilly May 2016 #146

LOL!!!! Beacool May 2016 #147

I tend to breathe a lot, air is good pinebox May 2016 #149

Please, some of you folks are just too funny. Beacool May 2016 #152

Straws? You mean that thing called "Meanwhile in the real world..." pinebox May 2016 #156

If there's an indictment, then I'll worry. Beacool May 2016 #166

Question is - when will the FBI findings of their criminal investigation be revealed? EndElectoral May 2016 #175

Right. That's why I don't understand the Clinton's supporters la-dee-daah attidute on this. yodermon May 2016 #188

Nice try... TeacherB87 May 2016 #179

Weak on national security is okay. B Calm May 2016 #190

Apparently to some. EndElectoral May 2016 #196

come on, it's only the presidency of the United States of America Cobalt Violet May 2016 #202

You forgot to put the "sarcasm" smiley in your message. pdsimdars May 2016 #208

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. pinebox May 2016 #210

couldn' resist Demsrule86 May 2016 #201

Here you want more sources? pinebox May 2016 #211

I believe the word you are looking for is "penis" notadmblnd May 2016 #230

She campaigned being strong on national security, what a joke! B Calm May 2016 #213

INSANE post. RBInMaine May 2016 #215

Ya, so insane that it holds water. pinebox May 2016 #224

Do you goofballs ever consider who wrote the bullcrap you keep slinging? bullimiami May 2016 #228

Is it hard to read replies to see this was discussed already? pinebox May 2016 #229

This message was self-deleted by its author Th1onein May 2016 #234

Me too. That would be the perfect timing for that bomb. I hope the FBI doesn't time it like that pdsimdars May 2016 #240

Deja vu loyalsister May 2016 #239