Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
19. Wow! Your post #16 certainly has to be explained to me.
Thu May 26, 2016, 10:19 PM
May 2016

That is some weird shit.


Star Member uponit7771 (30,970 posts)
16. Nope, neither are baby bunny rabbits ... cause that has to be explained to you? tia


What does it mean?

.
And she's still doing it today Press Virginia May 2016 #1
She can't help herself. Lying is in her DNA. So is hubris. cui bono May 2016 #2
I wonder if the media is going to question her new lie or just repeat it Press Virginia May 2016 #5
Just like Bill Lied right up to the day of Senate Impeachment Hearings FreakinDJ May 2016 #151
It's an aristocratic entitlement. And hubris of course. nm rhett o rick May 2016 #153
Liars gotta lie! Carolina May 2016 #7
yes grasswire May 2016 #67
Isn't she wasn't she an attorney? Wasn't Bill a Rhodes Scholar? Wasn't Bill President of the U.S.? Seeinghope May 2016 #27
Then she should know better than to keep lying about it Press Virginia May 2016 #32
On what premise do you base your conclusion? laserhaas May 2016 #158
Exactly! My point! Seeinghope May 2016 #161
Wow, another brand new HRC supporter here in DU. rhett o rick May 2016 #154
Not! Why would you think I was a Hillary Clinton supporter? I was mentioning their educations Seeinghope May 2016 #157
They are experts in repetitive, babbling, obfuscating bullchit laserhaas May 2016 #159
Why did she need to skirt FOI law is the question. She had to know she'd be a target for hacking . MaeScott May 2016 #120
Concur...mens rea...scienter....are the issues laserhaas May 2016 #160
If it resonates with the majority, it will continue Babel_17 May 2016 #136
Sigh, so she forgot to put the cover on the TPS report and the "far left" is losing their shit... uponit7771 May 2016 #3
Yeah, that's all it was....except it wasnt Press Virginia May 2016 #6
OK, she forgot to the TPS report cover and went 46.6 mph in a 45 mph zone... that better? tia uponit7771 May 2016 #9
Other than the fact it ignores reality, sure Press Virginia May 2016 #11
Well that poster also "thinks" BLM activists are "reThugs". cui bono May 2016 #17
You were far more concerned about classified information when Manning exposed mass-murder: cpwm17 May 2016 #26
Cause she did it on purpose?! You understand the context of that conversation, no one has to uponit7771 May 2016 #29
How does one accidentally hire people to set up a private server? cui bono May 2016 #36
was already set up in the house, no one has to explain that to you either... you guys think everyone uponit7771 May 2016 #61
How did she accidentally start using it instead of the state dept server then? cui bono May 2016 #66
To set up credentials on the server that was already there, she didn't have the know how... uponit7771 May 2016 #74
So she did do it on purpose. I thought you said she didn't? cui bono May 2016 #79
Prepare to run in circles with this one Press Virginia May 2016 #82
Oh, believe me, I know. =) cui bono May 2016 #87
I see a total detachment from reality Press Virginia May 2016 #90
it being expose states secrets to security threats, again.. having to have to explain this shit uponit7771 May 2016 #88
You keep talking about explaining things but you have yet to do so. cui bono May 2016 #92
Awesome! jham123 May 2016 #144
Well it's unbelievable that someone would say she didn't release classified info on purpose. cui bono May 2016 #145
was "nothing burger" on The Brock talking points memo? AntiBank May 2016 #102
What about using the private server she used to communicate with Blumenthal - who'd polly7 May 2016 #108
She must have forgotten to reply to this post. I'm sure she wanted to bring up baby bunnies. cui bono May 2016 #148
Hillary deliberately expose secrets by disregarding security concerns. cpwm17 May 2016 #41
Cause the SD's systems with 5 1/4" floppies was more secure!? You're kidding right?! uponit7771 May 2016 #62
It isn't Hillary's place to determine that her server in her closet cpwm17 May 2016 #83
If you don't like the news, go somewhere else. Scootaloo May 2016 #60
This isn't news, it's tripe at best especially seeing tRump was accused of rape twice... uponit7771 May 2016 #63
If you don't like it, go away. No one's keeping you here Scootaloo May 2016 #70
Because rules are only for the little people. cpwm17 May 2016 #71
and that rapist-sociopath might win if we keep her as our candidate. Pick another DLC member. zazen May 2016 #132
What King that republican puke bag, king?? boston bean May 2016 #4
+1, lets us all know how many reThugs are posting on DU these days uponit7771 May 2016 #10
So BLM activists are now "reThugs"? cui bono May 2016 #14
Nope, neither are baby bunny rabbits ... cause that has to be explained to you? tia uponit7771 May 2016 #16
Wow! Your post #16 certainly has to be explained to me. cui bono May 2016 #19
I responded to a question, ... Republicans thought Bush was smart uponit7771 May 2016 #23
What does that have to do with anything? You called a BLM activist a "reThug" cui bono May 2016 #25
This is false on its face uponit7771 May 2016 #28
No it's not. It's right on this internet page. You need to be logical to follow along though. cui bono May 2016 #34
I did not call anyone a rethug, you can NOT post any words of me doing such. That's false on its uponit7771 May 2016 #35
I don't need to, you posted them already and I quoted it already. cui bono May 2016 #37
The fact that you call a BLM activist a GOP puppet nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #18
Sophistry, the quest was asked which King... but go ahead and whine, seems typical of the "far left" uponit7771 May 2016 #21
LMAO and now you go personal on me nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #24
Something is wrong with the logic there. The repsonses are making no sense. cui bono May 2016 #30
I have studied scandals and covered one major scandal nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #33
Yeah, and then you said how many "reThugs" are posting here now. cui bono May 2016 #31
Don't bother to find out what you are responding to. I know, facts are hard. cui bono May 2016 #15
They are in such a hurry to 840high May 2016 #58
+10000 AntiBank May 2016 #103
So....BLM goes under the bus. (Or at least one of their activists). (nt) jeff47 May 2016 #40
Once again, it seems black voices only count when they support the rich white lady Scootaloo May 2016 #75
Yep. The rest get called names and bullied. cui bono May 2016 #85
It is either lies or the typical Reagan sadoldgirl May 2016 #8
She's a serial liar. HooptieWagon May 2016 #12
+1 gravityspy May 2016 #13
A serial liar? oberliner May 2016 #46
Oh please. Anyone who's paid any attention to the Clintons knows Press Virginia May 2016 #52
The "serial liar" phrase is repeated on RW outlets is all I am saying oberliner May 2016 #54
It's also an accurate claim Press Virginia May 2016 #55
Isn't it strange that Breitbart and Rush Limbaugh would be so right about HRC oberliner May 2016 #72
Their opinions are bullshit. Press Virginia May 2016 #73
Their opinion is that Hillary is a serial liar oberliner May 2016 #76
Do you have a description that is more palatable to you Press Virginia May 2016 #78
We could use more friendly words maybe - Mother Of Four May 2016 #93
Those are pretty good Press Virginia May 2016 #94
Truth impaired? Autumn May 2016 #124
I don't believe in repeating right-wing talking points oberliner May 2016 #109
so...we have to hurry to find descriptions that fit before the RW adopts them? islandmkl May 2016 #122
Trump's "Crooked Hillary" moniker is already being used here oberliner May 2016 #123
Or accurate descriptions, it seems Press Virginia May 2016 #130
I don't think "serial liar" is an accurate description oberliner May 2016 #133
When one tells lie after lie after lie, it is serial lying Press Virginia May 2016 #134
That's not an opinion. The facts have shown over the years that that is what she is. cui bono May 2016 #91
It is an opinion and it's an opinion held by right-wingers oberliner May 2016 #110
No because their logic is similar to yours pinebox May 2016 #128
Or maybe she's not a serial liar? oberliner May 2016 #141
I considered it up until she kept lying. Serially. cui bono May 2016 #155
Oh please. We all know "prominent Democrats" don't say the L word. cui bono May 2016 #139
Right-wingers can be right about something? oberliner May 2016 #142
Yes. And of course the majority of people who think she is unfit for office are right wingers. cui bono May 2016 #143
thats the lamest logical falacy I have seen all day AntiBank May 2016 #104
No argument is being made so there can be no logical fallacy oberliner May 2016 #111
its actually 2 logical fallacies: genetic fallacy and/or guilt by association AntiBank May 2016 #116
It is neither oberliner May 2016 #118
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #56
It's accurate. 840high May 2016 #65
It's amazing how accurate Breitbart, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage are about HRC oberliner May 2016 #68
I'm sure they can accurately describe the color of the sky as well. Scootaloo May 2016 #80
35 Facts That Prove “Space Jam” Is Criminally Underrated oberliner May 2016 #84
35 reasons I should never again read a damn thing you post Scootaloo May 2016 #86
thread winna AntiBank May 2016 #105
Space Jam was a classic oberliner May 2016 #113
Where's the link? oberliner May 2016 #112
ask Scootaloo AntiBank May 2016 #114
That's who the post is directed to oberliner May 2016 #115
oh, sorry, it came up as you replying to me, strange, lol, sorry AntiBank May 2016 #117
No problem oberliner May 2016 #119
It sounds like the front page of Reddit and half the content of Twitter. DisgustipatedinCA May 2016 #81
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #20
This piece is even more damming than others nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #22
Shaun King has been a Bernie supporter for months oberliner May 2016 #45
Yeah but the people I heard that from today nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #47
Well that is unfortunate oberliner May 2016 #48
Well, this is having an effect nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #49
I know oberliner May 2016 #51
Well the party will have to make their decision nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #53
The voters pretty much already have oberliner May 2016 #64
Think LBJ nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #69
I guess the only thing I'm curious about, cheapdate May 2016 #38
So I will mark you down as not giving a fuck that she lied Matt_in_STL May 2016 #39
Please do. cheapdate May 2016 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author AntiBank May 2016 #106
you are correct, to some degree, but seem to expect the extreme to be the only possible outcome... islandmkl May 2016 #125
I have no idea what assumptions you're making about my politics or ethics cheapdate May 2016 #135
unfortunately for the Democratic Party, the real fight isn't HRC vs Trump.... islandmkl May 2016 #137
If you are 100% opposed to Republican politics then you should be critical of both cui bono May 2016 #140
I stand with HONEST Democrats pmorlan1 May 2016 #42
All Democrats will get my support in the 2016 General Election. cheapdate May 2016 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #59
Bullshit. cheapdate May 2016 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #95
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #96
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #98
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #100
I think I've made my position cheapdate May 2016 #99
It's not hard. She's been in the public spotlight for almost 3 decades. cheapdate May 2016 #150
The first things you list as important to you: "clean water, clean air, healthy food, cui bono May 2016 #146
You're preaching to the choir. cheapdate May 2016 #149
+1 HooptieWagon May 2016 #57
The truth bears out eventually....lots of time left. nt Land of Enchantment May 2016 #50
Shaun King has no credibility! LiberalFighter May 2016 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #97
Denial isn't a river n/t JesterCS May 2016 #107
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #101
Is this from that right wing NY slimeback King? Who the hell would post such SHIT on DU? RBInMaine May 2016 #121
Did you know Shaun King is a civil rights activist? B Calm May 2016 #126
Time For The Coffin To Be Fitted cantbeserious May 2016 #127
Great candidate you backed, Hillary fans! vintx May 2016 #129
But here's the problem LynnTTT May 2016 #131
Rec for the sub-thread in which a Hillary apologist gets his/her ass kicked. Scuba May 2016 #138
Will this shit be allowed when she clinches the nom? Darb May 2016 #147
Did anyone actually read the report, this article isn't representing the facts at all. eastwestdem May 2016 #152
LA LA LA LA LA LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Warren DeMontague May 2016 #156
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»KING: Hillary Clinton has...»Reply #19