Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
This argument makes no sense, quite frankly. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #1
"no new charges" NCTraveler May 2016 #3
Not my language, it is Tiefer's choice. He says "It does not add any new serious charges..." JonLeibowitz May 2016 #4
It must be dreamy in your world farleftlib May 2016 #2
Vindicates Clinton Rather Than Nails Her workinclasszero May 2016 #5
Not Surprised pmorlan1 May 2016 #6
Maybe he knows a witch hunt when he sees one. TwilightZone May 2016 #10
You're free to believe whatever you want pmorlan1 May 2016 #11
Yes, she broke Federal Records law. Therefore she is vindicated. mmonk May 2016 #7
Where does it say she broke "Federal Records law"? TwilightZone May 2016 #9
Whoops. You're right. It doesn't. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #13
She did not comply with the Federal Records Act. mmonk May 2016 #17
Guilty until proven innocent? Sure, why not. TwilightZone May 2016 #18
Prima facie. mmonk May 2016 #19
From Forbes, no less. TwilightZone May 2016 #8
It was an opinion piece pmorlan1 May 2016 #12
Oh, my word. Not a Democratic ally! TwilightZone May 2016 #14
I'm a Democrat Too pmorlan1 May 2016 #15
Yes indeed, damn those Democrats NastyRiffraff May 2016 #20
Who said anything about not listening to them? pmorlan1 May 2016 #21
This place is ridiculous right now! Stuckinthebush May 2016 #16
It's Forbes. kstewart33 May 2016 #22
You might want to read the damn report nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Forbes: State Departmen...»Reply #12