Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
3. WaPo: "State Dept. inspector general report sharply criticizes Clinton’s email practices"
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:43 AM
May 2016
State Dept. inspector general report sharply criticizes Clinton’s email practices

By Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger May 25 at 10:18 AM

The State Department’s independent watchdog has issued a highly critical analysis of Hillary Clinton’s email practices while running the department, concluding that she failed to seek legal approval for her use of a private email server and that department staff would not have given its blessing because of the “security risks in doing so.”

The inspector general, in a long awaited review obtained Wednesday by The Washington Post in advance of its publication, found that Clinton’s use of private email for public business was “not an appropriate method” of preserving documents and that her practices failed to comply with department policies meant to ensure federal record laws are followed.

The report says she should have printed and saved her emails during her four years in office or surrendered her work-related correspondence immediately upon stepping down in February 2013. Instead, Clinton provided those records in December 2014, nearly two years after leaving office.

The report found that a top Clinton aide was warned in 2010 that the system may not properly preserve records but dismissed those worries, indicating that the system had passed legal muster. But the inspector general said it could not show evidence of a review by legal counsel.

Read more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/state-dept-inspector-general-report-sharply-criticizes-clintons-email-practices/2016/05/25/fc6f8ebc-2275-11e6-aa84-42391ba52c91_story.html?wpisrc=al_alert-COMBO-politics%252Bnation
emails and stuff. stonecutter357 May 2016 #1
Dude this is the State Department inspector general FFS! pinebox May 2016 #9
seems legit ! stonecutter357 May 2016 #11
It is legit pinebox May 2016 #12
Not serious at all...some have been waiting and hoping the hammer will finally drop to no avail. asuhornets May 2016 #19
Why pretend this isn't going to hurt her in the general election? cali May 2016 #22
Because she isn't going to make it to the General Election! lagomorph777 May 2016 #28
Because it did not touch her in the Primaries....nt asuhornets May 2016 #41
Grab a tiny clue. That is a remarkably dumb comparison. cali May 2016 #44
Because it's not dumb as you say---You may disagree asuhornets May 2016 #47
Sigh. The general election is very different from the primaries cali May 2016 #48
Yea right,, he's been attacking her non stop... asuhornets May 2016 #49
He never attacked her on the email business. NEVER. cali May 2016 #93
he did not attack her on the email issue....nt asuhornets May 2016 #95
Yep, he attacked her reeeeallll good... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #98
He has attacked her on "other stuff".... asuhornets May 2016 #100
No he hasn't. He's been campaigning for president and speaking truth to power. nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #104
The primaries are a bubble. You realize this correct? pinebox May 2016 #75
Uh it's very serious pinebox May 2016 #24
Breaking the rules are different from breaking the law. Everyone knows she used a private server..nt asuhornets May 2016 #42
Hillary has zero integrity and this is just more proof. She is in big trouble. pinebox May 2016 #76
Some have been waiting and hoping for a year for this to all go away. frylock May 2016 #56
Exactly, we've been waiting a whole year and nothing.. asuhornets May 2016 #77
Sure, yeah, okay. frylock May 2016 #81
See you then.. asuhornets May 2016 #83
You know it takes time to investigate 60,000 emails, dot all the Is and cross all the Ts. Fawke Em May 2016 #109
it's been a year and a Benghazi hearing..Don't get your hopes up. asuhornets May 2016 #112
Wasn't it like seven Benghazi hearings and/or investigations? LuvLoogie May 2016 #116
yes...nt asuhornets May 2016 #119
what really happened in roswell... stonecutter357 May 2016 #72
Roswell? Wasn't Hillary calling for a UFO investigation? pinebox May 2016 #79
HRC supporters will never acknowledge her Press Virginia May 2016 #84
Who is biased! scscholar May 2016 #105
He's not a criminal investigator. Fawke Em May 2016 #113
Heads and sand and stuff. frylock May 2016 #52
did we really land on the moon? stonecutter357 May 2016 #70
Yes, we did. frylock May 2016 #73
What an odd question, unless you're a conspiracy nut. Did they not teach about that in your... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #86
I am not sure her supporters care about her lack of compliance with federal law. IdaBriggs May 2016 #2
Her supporters wouldn't care if she ate a baby on live television... Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #7
Well, her rogue foreign policy did cause death for a lot of babies. polly7 May 2016 #16
Don't make a joke of this. Have you tried kitten blood? It's good. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #23
The only thing they would have in their collective memory of that appearance on live television is.. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #26
First! Woman! President! Ever!!! Yayayayyay!!! reformist2 May 2016 #118
they don't care. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #18
Her supporters cling to the Gowdy Bengahazi hearings like a security blanket from all of this. morningfog May 2016 #31
WaPo: "State Dept. inspector general report sharply criticizes Clinton’s email practices" think May 2016 #3
I love toast nt firebrand80 May 2016 #4
Lol Dem2 May 2016 #5
It's looking more and more like Hillary won't be making it to the WH. NWCorona May 2016 #10
No it doesn't Demsrule86 May 2016 #15
Yes, it does. nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #17
Yup a big nothing NWCorona May 2016 #20
yes it does. n/t Cobalt Violet May 2016 #21
The FBI isn't a big nothing, though. Fawke Em May 2016 #50
It amounts to a gigantic ZERO jzodda May 2016 #37
It's over, all right. frylock May 2016 #59
Yep its over jzodda May 2016 #67
The FBI only has the power to recommend an indictment or not. frylock May 2016 #71
You realize willful attempts the thwart FOIA is a crime? Press Virginia May 2016 #85
Did you read the report. That is not an accurate assessment. morningfog May 2016 #107
It's my assessment Dem2 May 2016 #115
Hillary would prefer her toast without any type of jam, please... islandmkl May 2016 #6
Sharply criticize? Like is she going to get a timeout? trudyco May 2016 #8
"Work hard..and play by the rules" - Bill Clinton Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #13
State didn't maintain emails as they were supposed to Demsrule86 May 2016 #14
She was at the head of the State Department. But you knew that already. DisgustipatedinCA May 2016 #29
Uh... how would State maintain e-mails from a server hidden from them by Hillary? lagomorph777 May 2016 #33
That was the plan all along. frylock May 2016 #61
So it's ok for Hillary to possess bad judgement because everybody else did, including... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #65
Uh...State did not have the emails. Only Clinton did. jeff47 May 2016 #91
You are in desperate need of new talking points. arcane1 May 2016 #110
The day I start my fast, you have to pop up an image of toast. Mmm Toast. Be strong... T-O-A-S-T! TheBlackAdder May 2016 #25
K&R. dchill May 2016 #27
Much ado about nothing. On to the GE and the White House! Beausoir May 2016 #30
The FBI, DOJ and State IG disagree with your assessment. morningfog May 2016 #34
On to President Trump! lagomorph777 May 2016 #36
Hillary Clinton is unfit to be president AZ Progressive May 2016 #32
Agreed: she conspicuously lacks good judgement. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #62
Read it Slap on the Wrist jzodda May 2016 #35
Another glaring example of H. Clinton's poor judgment. tabasco May 2016 #38
Trump will have a field day with this. She's the LibDemAlways May 2016 #39
Trump's ad with this story will air on lagomorph777 May 2016 #45
He already is.... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #54
This adds more fuel to the fire. n/t LibDemAlways May 2016 #92
To give you an idea of the impact of this news hitting MSM floppyboo May 2016 #40
Yawn... workinclasszero May 2016 #43
*whew*. thanks. Was worried there that Trump would *POUND* her with this. what a relief! yodermon May 2016 #55
This is just the tip of the iceberg--but the SS Hillary has hit it now. BillZBubb May 2016 #46
John Kerry should be removed from his post as SOS! KPN May 2016 #51
Did you read the post yesterday? It was Kerry who first made the first request for them to look pdsimdars May 2016 #99
The ptb could tap him Mike__M May 2016 #111
Kerry's the one cleaning up the mess H. Clinton left behind. n/t tabasco May 2016 #117
The Indictment Fairy has been grounded. So sad. randome May 2016 #53
This was the State Dept. They don't have the power to recommend an indictment. frylock May 2016 #64
My bad. Oh, well, hope for the Fairy lingers on, then! randome May 2016 #66
Your continous mocking of the Indictment Fairy is going to come back to bite. frylock May 2016 #69
Not me. randome May 2016 #82
Hillarians respond to State Department Inspector General's report of wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton: Kip Humphrey May 2016 #57
Someone once used the phrase "Camp Weathervane Ostrich army" pdsimdars May 2016 #101
That would be me. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #120
And it was brilliant and I remembered it . Maybe now I can remember it completely. pdsimdars May 2016 #122
Why thank you! I have my moments. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #123
The State Department is controlled by Republicans. n/t QC May 2016 #58
Who ran the State Department when Hillary was Secretary of State? Avalux May 2016 #102
The report also criticized government email security in general. It's a systematic issue. Trust Buster May 2016 #60
This State Department report TeddyR May 2016 #63
Oh, so because everyone else showed bad judgement, that makes it ok for... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #87
No, it means that, if they wish to fix the systematic problem of a government unprepared for the Trust Buster May 2016 #89
How many SoSs had their own servers in order to avoid government records laws? nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #90
I don't really care. I don't share your political motivations to attack Hillary Clinton. Trust Buster May 2016 #94
Ooohhhhh, oh oh oh... YOU DON'T CARE. I see. Well, check out the... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #97
I don't want bad judgement from a President. 840high May 2016 #106
You'd think the DNC would have vetted her before pushing her out to the front! B Calm May 2016 #68
But it was HER TURN. I think that's all the vetting they needed. Apparently. pdsimdars May 2016 #103
One can only Faux pas May 2016 #74
Drip, drip, drip. Glad Bernie's staying in the race. Vinca May 2016 #78
Not a good day for the Hillary campaign. B Calm May 2016 #80
Just think how this will play out at the Democratic convention. -none May 2016 #88
The Republicans are lining up behind Trump. LibDemAlways May 2016 #96
How many? Zero. JoePhilly May 2016 #108
You're saying that they are all bought off? -none May 2016 #121
After all the money and trouble that was The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #114
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Breaking: State Dept repo...»Reply #3