Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why Clinton’s Claim Of Having 3 Million More Votes Than Sanders Is A Total Lie [View all]silvershadow
(10,336 posts)86. The popular vote doesn't win primaries. The delegates choose, and many are not bound
in any way by the popular vote. This primary may well yet expose how Human "Persons" vote vs. how "Corporate Persons" vote.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why Clinton’s Claim Of Having 3 Million More Votes Than Sanders Is A Total Lie [View all]
silvershadow
May 2016
OP
You didn't even read the article now, did you...yeah you didn't...you are right..
insta8er
May 2016
#10
Ah, ok sorry that explains everything...no reason to think yourself. Getting your "news" dished out
insta8er
May 2016
#19
This is Bernie math - 3 million voters are 3 million votes - how disgusting and stupid.
MariaThinks
May 2016
#18
Also the negative votes of Hillary voters that deep in their heart want Bernie but don't know it yet
YouDig
May 2016
#4
I guess Bernie would prefer that all his voters who tweeted their votes be counted also
Txbluedog
May 2016
#5
Maybe they were a lurker, and is that the only argument you can come up with?
Arneoker
May 2016
#125
OK, maybe it's only 2.8 Million. Then, again, maybe the demographics in a lot of those states
Hoyt
May 2016
#6
Those white an rural states don't equal 3 million. Sanders supporters are trying everything to . . .
brush
May 2016
#16
While I don't think the relatively small number of caucus goers will make a dent in the numbers...
eastwestdem
May 2016
#8
So, 3m lead in actual votes cast = lie. "Sanders is ahead" with no basis in reality = truth.
TwilightZone
May 2016
#26
3m lead + 1 FBI investigation = too close to call until she is exonerated. She hasn't been.
silvershadow
May 2016
#27
Even Sanders doesn't dispute this. He always claims in his speeches that he has 9 million votes
lunamagica
May 2016
#29
Thank you. For some reason they like to scream it from the rooftops like it means something. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#30
Can you blame them? Who in their right minds counts votes by caucuses?...Nevermind. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#85
He will do just as he as succinctly and professionally stated he would do. Finish this primary so
silvershadow
May 2016
#54
It's not a secret, and it doesn't change the fact that 3 million more people have voted for her.
CrowCityDem
May 2016
#53
The popular vote doesn't win primaries. The delegates choose, and many are not bound
silvershadow
May 2016
#86
You might take that up with the author, then, if you are unsatisfied with what I have presented. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#93
Exactly. This whole primary has been a stage-managed event straight out of Corporate PR vs.
silvershadow
May 2016
#88
Do you ever give any critical thinking to supporting a candidate under current FBI
silvershadow
May 2016
#98
Read it however you will. Your non-answer and snide original remark tell me all I need to know. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#100
and your posting of articles that can't be defended by you tells me everything I need to know.
onenote
May 2016
#107
The real world doesn't think that Bernie should get credit for 71 percent of 7 million
onenote
May 2016
#113