Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why Clinton’s Claim Of Having 3 Million More Votes Than Sanders Is A Total Lie [View all]CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)53. It's not a secret, and it doesn't change the fact that 3 million more people have voted for her.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why Clinton’s Claim Of Having 3 Million More Votes Than Sanders Is A Total Lie [View all]
silvershadow
May 2016
OP
You didn't even read the article now, did you...yeah you didn't...you are right..
insta8er
May 2016
#10
Ah, ok sorry that explains everything...no reason to think yourself. Getting your "news" dished out
insta8er
May 2016
#19
This is Bernie math - 3 million voters are 3 million votes - how disgusting and stupid.
MariaThinks
May 2016
#18
Also the negative votes of Hillary voters that deep in their heart want Bernie but don't know it yet
YouDig
May 2016
#4
I guess Bernie would prefer that all his voters who tweeted their votes be counted also
Txbluedog
May 2016
#5
Maybe they were a lurker, and is that the only argument you can come up with?
Arneoker
May 2016
#125
OK, maybe it's only 2.8 Million. Then, again, maybe the demographics in a lot of those states
Hoyt
May 2016
#6
Those white an rural states don't equal 3 million. Sanders supporters are trying everything to . . .
brush
May 2016
#16
While I don't think the relatively small number of caucus goers will make a dent in the numbers...
eastwestdem
May 2016
#8
So, 3m lead in actual votes cast = lie. "Sanders is ahead" with no basis in reality = truth.
TwilightZone
May 2016
#26
3m lead + 1 FBI investigation = too close to call until she is exonerated. She hasn't been.
silvershadow
May 2016
#27
Even Sanders doesn't dispute this. He always claims in his speeches that he has 9 million votes
lunamagica
May 2016
#29
Thank you. For some reason they like to scream it from the rooftops like it means something. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#30
Can you blame them? Who in their right minds counts votes by caucuses?...Nevermind. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#85
He will do just as he as succinctly and professionally stated he would do. Finish this primary so
silvershadow
May 2016
#54
It's not a secret, and it doesn't change the fact that 3 million more people have voted for her.
CrowCityDem
May 2016
#53
The popular vote doesn't win primaries. The delegates choose, and many are not bound
silvershadow
May 2016
#86
You might take that up with the author, then, if you are unsatisfied with what I have presented. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#93
Exactly. This whole primary has been a stage-managed event straight out of Corporate PR vs.
silvershadow
May 2016
#88
Do you ever give any critical thinking to supporting a candidate under current FBI
silvershadow
May 2016
#98
Read it however you will. Your non-answer and snide original remark tell me all I need to know. nt
silvershadow
May 2016
#100
and your posting of articles that can't be defended by you tells me everything I need to know.
onenote
May 2016
#107
The real world doesn't think that Bernie should get credit for 71 percent of 7 million
onenote
May 2016
#113