2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Make No Mistake, Sandersism Has Defeated Clintonism [View all]
Make No Mistake, Sandersism Has Defeated Clintonism
05/18/2016 02:23 pm ET |
Seth Abramson
Attorney; Assistant Professor, UNH; Series Editor, Best American Experimental Writing
In 2008, Hillary Clinton on her way to losing the Democratic nomination won nine of the final 25 nominating contests. In 2016, she may well despite being treated as the likely winner of this years Democratic primary by the mainstream media win only seven or eight of the final 25 state primaries and caucuses.
If youre wondering how Clinton could perform worse in the second half of the election cycle in 2016 than she did in 2008 and still be in a position to win, theres a good explanation for it that goes beyond the fact that the neck-and-neck Democratic primary race weve had for over two months started with a brief but solid run for Clinton. In 2008, both Democratic candidates were sanctioned by Party elders, so super-delegates were free to pick whoever they thought was the stronger candidate without fear of reprisal. In 2016, super-delegates are expected to go with Clinton even if the insurgent Sanders has clearly shown himself, by mid-June, to be the stronger general-election candidate in terms of both head-to-head match-ups with Trump, favorability ratings among independent voters, and performance in the second half of the nominating season.
Super-delegates will fall into line the thinking goes not because Clinton is a strong general-election bet, or liked by many people, or a real spokeswoman for the ideology of the Party base, or able to win independents, or nearly the same candidate in May that she was in February, or capable of winning over her current Democratic opposition the way Obama did after the primary in 2008, but because Democrats in Washington have made clear that any super-delegates who back the now-stronger horse in Philadelphia this July Sanders will be ostracized from the Party. Fear, then, is what could make Clinton the Democratic nominee even if (a) super-delegates are officially charged with voting for the strongest general-election candidate, and (b) Clinton goes on a historic losing streak in the back half of the primary season election calendar.
But all thats horse-race nonsense, and wont matter very much to political historians looking back at this period in American history from the vantage point of, say, 2116.
more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/make-no-mistake-sanderism_b_10008136.html