Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demsrule86

(68,882 posts)
18. Nathan Sales...worked in Homeland under Bush...writes for the national review quite often.
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:46 PM
May 2016

Wrote pretty much the same story a while back...rightie with an agenda. National Review is a right-wing rag. Always check your sources unless you want to mislead or something.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421896/criminal-or-not-hillary-clintons-e-mails-are-national-security-risk-nathan-sales

I don't think anyone in this country is surprised. George II May 2016 #1
No, but there are a number of people here who are desperately hoping for an indictment mythology May 2016 #24
And they're having the SADZ now. BlueCaliDem May 2016 #30
No "intent to mishandle" found. Unfortunately, there are other factors. pat_k May 2016 #2
Nathan Sales...worked in Homeland under Bush...writes for the national review quite often. Demsrule86 May 2016 #18
I appreciate the info on the source. pat_k May 2016 #21
I know how badly Bernie supporters want their own reality, politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #19
Thanks for the insight. pat_k May 2016 #22
Just who are these unnamed officials? nt NWCorona May 2016 #3
the article admits she broke laws/just wether she did knowingly questionseverything May 2016 #27
OMG ucrdem May 2016 #4
I am hearing that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is one of the 'anonymous officials' AgingAmerican May 2016 #5
Adjust your tinfoil, then the voices will go away. nt procon May 2016 #7
So you cannot confirm otherwise? AgingAmerican May 2016 #8
Can you confirm you didn't make that up right now? Adrahil May 2016 #9
Breaking: Confirmed! AgingAmerican May 2016 #11
That's what I thought. Adrahil May 2016 #12
Do you have inside info on just who these alleged 'officials' are? AgingAmerican May 2016 #14
No. I'm sure the WaPo just made them up. Expect an indictment tomorrow. Adrahil May 2016 #16
The WaPo is just repeating CNN AgingAmerican May 2016 #17
Clap your hands!! Adrahil May 2016 #20
This too: "Anne Gearan and Adam Goldman contributed to this report." Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #10
Yawn, because it is so NOT surprising. nt BootinUp May 2016 #6
meanwhile back in Bernieville CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #13
Lol!! oasis May 2016 #25
Oh dear. Do we have enough buckets to catch all the tears that will fall? grossproffit May 2016 #15
Good. I hope these leaks are accurate and this gets wrapped up soon. morningfog May 2016 #23
Now it's gone from US officials to FBI officials Press Virginia May 2016 #26
You don't have to have malicious intent Aerows May 2016 #28
So, Clinton's defense has morphed to: She broke the law, but she didn't understand that law. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WAPO: scant evidence agai...»Reply #18