Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
70. The two are nothing alike as you well know.
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 04:07 PM
Apr 2016

You said in post #13 that you think Sanders' senate financial disclosures are sufficient. I am asking if you think the same is true for Ted Cruz, since he is also a US senator. Specifically, you wrote:

There is full disclosure of all his finances in the Senate record, it is a requirement and open to the public already, if there were any "laws broken", I am sure they would have caught it.


I am simply asking if you think the same standard should apply to Ted Cruz or not.

My question does not contain any implicit logical fallacies of the kind you are trying to distract people with. You are certainly going to great lengths to avoid answering a simple question.
It's all they got. djean111 Apr 2016 #1
It IS all they got. And you know they have looked and looked. yourpaljoey Apr 2016 #4
They even became stalkers over the plane flight to the Vatican. Fawke Em Apr 2016 #60
Good for you. . . .thanks from everyone. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #84
Holy shit....you are scary. Please add the tinfoil hat to these posts. Nt pkdu Apr 2016 #154
The tax returns go directly to the candidate's adherence to the law of the land. MADem Apr 2016 #2
This scscholar Apr 2016 #12
Yes opinions change, and Hillary Clinton's opinions change EXTREMELY often Dragonfli Apr 2016 #13
But TAX RETURNS are a declaration to the government. MADem Apr 2016 #15
. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #16
Yeah, it sucks when the bottom line is that your candidate is not being transparent. MADem Apr 2016 #22
I see what you're doing (talk about transparent) Dragonfli Apr 2016 #25
No, you don't. The US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT does not require that MADem Apr 2016 #28
Easy on the truth MADem, they can't handle the truth. oasis Apr 2016 #74
13.4 percent's worth of truth. If everyone paid as few taxes as Berrrnie, you wouldn't be able to MADem Apr 2016 #76
If Bernie is hiding his tax info, it should be addressed. nt oasis Apr 2016 #81
DING DING DING!! uponit7771 Apr 2016 #121
Don't let facts get in your way hueymahl Apr 2016 #202
All of his assets are in his wife's name--why do you suppose that is? MADem Apr 2016 #204
Estate planning? hueymahl Apr 2016 #207
I think if he didn't cut that shit loose, he'd be a millionaire...and ya can't have that, can ya? MADem Apr 2016 #208
You are a piece of work hueymahl Apr 2016 #210
Do you even look at the garbage you write? MADem Apr 2016 #211
You sure are acting angry hueymahl Apr 2016 #215
I am not--but YOU keep getting personal with me and calling me names. MADem Apr 2016 #223
Good luck with the rest of your day hueymahl Apr 2016 #226
that is so awesome. Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #35
Well, I have tried not to use ignore very often and still only have perhaps a dozen on ignore Dragonfli Apr 2016 #43
You have grown from a Conservative Democrat I sometimes disagreed with, but fairly decent Dragonfli Apr 2016 #29
Yeah, and you have no argument, so you make it about MEEEEEEEEE. MADem Apr 2016 #122
PREACH!!!!! Happy Friday!!!! n/t asuhornets Apr 2016 #216
Backatcha!!!!! MADem Apr 2016 #219
So was her oath as SOS. JudyM Apr 2016 #196
So would you be OK with Ted Cruz not releasing his tax returns? anigbrowl Apr 2016 #47
You are stating something as fact that is only rumor that he "will not release his tax returns" Dragonfli Apr 2016 #50
It's a simple yes or no question anigbrowl Apr 2016 #62
"Will you stop beating your wife" is also a yes or no answer, one I also wouldn't answer tho. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #64
The two are nothing alike as you well know. anigbrowl Apr 2016 #70
You are quite the ventriloquist Dragonfli Apr 2016 #73
Actually I quoted the same piece of text that you did... anigbrowl Apr 2016 #85
I think they would've uncovered if he broke the law YES, that answers the question re my words fully Dragonfli Apr 2016 #96
But .... but .... (Shirley Temple POUT) .... "It's Oooh Kaaaay if it's BERRRRRRNIE!!!!" MADem Apr 2016 #75
$50,000 in deductions is not distilled water. KittyWampus Apr 2016 #55
Thanks for reminding me, unlike the other poster now on ignore, you have always been abrassive Dragonfli Apr 2016 #61
That's not a bad thing either, people need to change for the better uponit7771 Apr 2016 #111
But changing so often both for the better and the worse and so very often shows little but Dragonfli Apr 2016 #116
The opposite is worse of the two uponit7771 Apr 2016 #117
Flexible adherence to a moral compass that does not waver or compromise moral values is best. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #119
Sept Sanders isn't flexible at all, matter of fact he's more dogmatic seeing there are few practical uponit7771 Apr 2016 #120
He is flexible, just not with his morality 109 economists including Robert Reich disagree regarding Dragonfli Apr 2016 #123
No he's not, well... until he see's he's going to totally lose a demographic... then he becomes uponit7771 Apr 2016 #124
sigh, you should have read my full post, not that the truth matters in a big Donor corporate Dragonfli Apr 2016 #126
That's what you're going with? "Opinions change?" morningfog Apr 2016 #86
I think the transcripts are going to disappoint the hell out of you eager beavers. MADem Apr 2016 #143
I really don't care about the transcripts, it's just a good issue to hammer. morningfog Apr 2016 #147
It's just a good issue to hammer. MADem Apr 2016 #149
I try. morningfog Apr 2016 #153
LMAO!!! basselope Apr 2016 #118
Yeah, I do. MADem Apr 2016 #145
LOL basselope Apr 2016 #150
We shall see--but don't act like you "know" -- because you don't. MADem Apr 2016 #152
I know enough to know there is absolutely nothing suspicious. basselope Apr 2016 #167
That's why Jane started sweating like a confidence man caught out on MSNBC when she was asked MADem Apr 2016 #168
Wow. The stuff people see when they are desperate. basselope Apr 2016 #173
Highly contested elections--are you high? He has only had one really tough election in recent MADem Apr 2016 #174
LMAO basselope Apr 2016 #180
You've never seen a GOP attack ad, obviously. You're YOUNG? MADem Apr 2016 #213
Seen many of them. basselope Apr 2016 #217
Well, Mike Dukakis and John Kerry do disagree with you, you know. MADem Apr 2016 #218
LOL. basselope Apr 2016 #222
Oh yeah, all those "progressives" voted for George Bush? Listen to you! MADem Apr 2016 #224
They didn't vote for Bush. They voted 3rd party. basselope Apr 2016 #225
Oh, yeah, sure!!! That must mean that "progressives" make up, what--two percent of the electorate? MADem Apr 2016 #227
Yes, feel the math. basselope Apr 2016 #228
Tax returns go to the IRS beedle Apr 2016 #140
Maybe, just maybe, Jane doesn't want the 4th Estate to pull those Schedule A items apart. MADem Apr 2016 #142
Maybe, beedle Apr 2016 #146
Sanders admitted she files extensions often, and amends as well. MADem Apr 2016 #148
Clintons ommitted whole shell companies beedle Apr 2016 #170
That's a garbage cite--no link. Talks about "financial reports" -- not tax returns. Stop conflating MADem Apr 2016 #172
so do FBI investigations AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #176
Oooooooooh (Shirley Temple Pout)! You are gonna be Soooooooo MAD when nothing comes of that! MADem Apr 2016 #177
Omg, your candidate appears to have sold weapons in exchange for foundation donations & you expect JudyM Apr 2016 #195
and Jane Sanders has committed to providing his new return as soon as it's completed, elleng Apr 2016 #3
The IRS will provide a copy of your full return for a fee. MADem Apr 2016 #6
Sure they could afford it, elleng Apr 2016 #10
Actually, the campaign is paying for their room and board, so MADem Apr 2016 #17
Who suggested I think they are 'donating to this campaign?' elleng Apr 2016 #20
YOU said THIS: MADem Apr 2016 #23
End this, please. elleng Apr 2016 #27
Bullshit. Jane has adult children who can go get that stuff for her. MADem Apr 2016 #32
I'm not interested in hillary's schedule a's, elleng Apr 2016 #36
You sure as hell would be if she DIDN'T RELEASE THEM. MADem Apr 2016 #38
you are claiming the campaign is paying their mortgage now? Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #37
Where in hell did you get that notion? MADem Apr 2016 #39
in what fairy land do the bills back home stop because you are traveling? Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #45
The electric bill goes down to nothing. If you're not paying to fill the fridge, but instead, MADem Apr 2016 #46
Weak Sauce, up and down mrdmk Apr 2016 #135
now you sound uneducated. FEC rules, you MUST spend campaign money on campaign ViseGrip Apr 2016 #92
That's just absurd. They are not "required to live off the campaign." That's pure NONSENSE. MADem Apr 2016 #129
And it takes several weeks to obtain the return from the IRS JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #127
If she'd ordered them when people started crabbing, instead of making mealy-mouthed excuses, MADem Apr 2016 #128
If you say so. I think I'll reserve judgement until I have some, ya know, facts. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #130
Here's one fact for you - 13.4 %; wouldn't it be nice to pay so little in income tax? MADem Apr 2016 #131
I paid less, so that would not be great. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #133
With receipts like these, Sanders isn't going to be able to send people to flower arranging classes, MADem Apr 2016 #134
Huh? No idea what you are saying. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #137
If one percenters are contributing so little to the coffers, Sanders will not be able to send people MADem Apr 2016 #139
Taxes will be raised. Pretty simple. I am ok with that. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #141
LOL--really? Bernie's gonna make that sale to a GOP congress? MADem Apr 2016 #144
Why are you shitting on beauticians and florists? SwampG8r Apr 2016 #183
I'm not "shitting on" them. But it costs less to train up in those jobs than it does to attend uni MADem Apr 2016 #192
Just keep shitting on folks then i guess SwampG8r Apr 2016 #198
Keep missing the point, then! See how that works? nt MADem Apr 2016 #199
Christ, Jane said she does them on TurboTax, COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #155
The topic of discussion was getting returns from the IRS. I said nothing of Turbotax. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #158
The point is that some had made the excuse that they COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #189
Are you seriously saying the main barrier is Jane's inability to physically access a filing cabinet? anigbrowl Apr 2016 #48
the real difference is that Jane had said that they will be released....Hillary won't say that,,,, virtualobserver Apr 2016 #52
Nobody but Bernie supporters care about the transcripts anigbrowl Apr 2016 #63
You are right, her transcripts tell us what she really believes when she talks to big business...... virtualobserver Apr 2016 #66
Complete nonsense anigbrowl Apr 2016 #80
This isn't about what is in her "heart of hearts"....The smoking gun is the secrecy itself. virtualobserver Apr 2016 #95
Not seeing it anigbrowl Apr 2016 #97
The money and the lack of transparency would be fine if she wasn't running for President....... virtualobserver Apr 2016 #100
The hyperbole is sort of ridiculous anigbrowl Apr 2016 #105
Hillary Clinton....the first incorruptible politician..... virtualobserver Apr 2016 #107
When you have to make up statements to attribute them to your opponent... anigbrowl Apr 2016 #110
I am just expressing what you are claiming,,they gave her millions and it won't affect her decsions virtualobserver Apr 2016 #112
No you're not. nt anigbrowl Apr 2016 #114
so then you are saying that the money will affect her decisions. Either it will or it won't. virtualobserver Apr 2016 #115
Au contrarie, if HRC supporters actually saw those transcripts she would have a lot less FighttheFuture Apr 2016 #82
And you know this how? anigbrowl Apr 2016 #87
There have been leeks, but WE don't go with that, we want confirmation. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #90
So no answer then anigbrowl Apr 2016 #99
Were those leeks in a soup??? COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #156
The Welsh make a fine leek soup! Oh, I could eat that stuff all day! nt MADem Apr 2016 #175
Me too! COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #186
She was not at GS et. al. for the food. So, Until she releases them, if ever, I will assume the FighttheFuture Apr 2016 #106
Well at least you are honest about being irrational anigbrowl Apr 2016 #108
This is why people like you get everyone else fucked in the ass! FighttheFuture Apr 2016 #194
uh huh anigbrowl Apr 2016 #197
What I see is government politicians being bought for pennies on the dollar. It it FighttheFuture Apr 2016 #206
Wrong again Bob. The only people who don't care about them are Hillary supporters pdsimdars Apr 2016 #89
No doubt you have evidence to back up this claim anigbrowl Apr 2016 #94
Jane said they were on TurboTax. No need to go home. Just a simple click of button. KittyWampus Apr 2016 #56
Hillary & her followers can't find real dirt. This is all they have... nt revbones Apr 2016 #5
Oh yeah? Why didn't they release these stinkers months ago? MADem Apr 2016 #8
The sad, ugly end will be in November, when your candidate loses because she's Fawke Em Apr 2016 #65
My candidate won't lose, and your candidate's supporters can either be a part of history or stand to MADem Apr 2016 #68
Agree. Hillary needs to release the transcripts now. Dawgs Apr 2016 #69
"Transcripts" are not mandated government documents. Tax returns are. MADem Apr 2016 #72
Bernie has promised to release. If he's a cheat then we will know. Dawgs Apr 2016 #78
$50,000 in deductions? Exposing a hypocrite who pretends to be pure KittyWampus Apr 2016 #58
I think he should offer a trade at the debate: TCJ70 Apr 2016 #7
Well Said. Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #9
Also the transcript issue has been ongoing now for months longer than dana_b Apr 2016 #11
He has no transcripts for Wall Street speaches. but pdsimdars Apr 2016 #91
yep! dana_b Apr 2016 #93
No transcripts have never been released tax returns have MattP Apr 2016 #14
And he has had "failure to disclose" problems in the past, that are documented. MADem Apr 2016 #19
No, they have not. That is categorically false. KittyWampus Apr 2016 #59
taxes are required by law. personal opinions given to bored people eating lousy food are not nt msongs Apr 2016 #18
Releasing tax returns has become a normal part of Presidential candidate politics for decades SFnomad Apr 2016 #21
And no others spoke to banking entities that broke our country, and got bailed out. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #34
You can come up with any excuse you want, but that still doesn't change the fact SFnomad Apr 2016 #41
That's a disingenuous statement. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #136
You're the one being disingenuous SFnomad Apr 2016 #169
Bullshit. You ignore the AMOUNTS of money. Those fees were huge and unprecedented. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #181
What, no presidential candidate has ever spoken to an audience of bankers before? anigbrowl Apr 2016 #49
Geez, are you pretending to not get it or are you just incapable of getting it? BillZBubb Apr 2016 #138
There is nothing to get anigbrowl Apr 2016 #191
Bernie and Jane will release anything from their tax returns that people want to see BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #24
When??? COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #157
I think we are missing something else of great importance here. Avalux Apr 2016 #26
Jane is capable to do their own, she is a smart lady. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #30
Regular One Percenters, you mean. nt MADem Apr 2016 #40
No, she does what millions of Anericans do every year. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #160
"Transcripts involve the shaping of US policy?" yallerdawg Apr 2016 #31
Ohhhhh NO! Have you forgotten Romney's speech he didn't want us to hear? ViseGrip Apr 2016 #42
I don't need to hear Republican speeches. yallerdawg Apr 2016 #44
Hillary and Bill are DINOs. Fawke Em Apr 2016 #67
Naw, Illimunati are the B Team. The Bildergerg Group is where the real COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #161
Nothing, if we aren't allowed to look at either. Orsino Apr 2016 #33
Bernie isn't hiding his. They're on the campaign trail and Jane said she will put them out when Zira Apr 2016 #53
Well, it's now April 13. Tick Tock. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #162
And how about prior years? Orsino Apr 2016 #200
Prior years too, of course. But not releasing COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #201
I disagree. Anyone can request a 30-day extension. Orsino Apr 2016 #203
They can request an extension to file but the cannot COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #205
Bernies Taxes get released every 6 years - every time he runs. Zira Apr 2016 #51
Cough (bullshit) cough. Paying 13.4 percent is interesting. 56K in deductions is INTERESTING. MADem Apr 2016 #71
Bernie tells truth. clinton tells stories. oldandhappy Apr 2016 #54
Furthest from a factual declaration I've seen all day. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #163
Both should be released, imo. (nt) bigwillq Apr 2016 #57
bernie is in the wrong... artyteacher Apr 2016 #77
Bernie has always released his tax returns and he will this time. Dawgs Apr 2016 #79
how is it a lie... artyteacher Apr 2016 #88
This is false, he didn't release FULL returns uponit7771 Apr 2016 #113
Because he hasn't released them yet. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #164
"Hasn't release yet" is not "he won't" so it's a lie. n/t Dawgs Apr 2016 #184
OK. When will he release them? January 3? COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #190
It's a lie because he said he will release them. Dawgs Apr 2016 #185
The IRS says they have Bernie's returns, no one but Hillary has her transcripts . . . . pdsimdars Apr 2016 #83
OK. Then why won't the make them public? COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #165
I'd like to know what it is people think they're going to find in his taxes LadyHawkAZ Apr 2016 #98
About $150 mill. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #101
The transcripts involve whether she's been bribed for $675,000 Herman4747 Apr 2016 #102
Bernie is going to look like a HUUUUGE hypocrite ... salinsky Apr 2016 #103
The Difference tirebiter Apr 2016 #104
lol... birdiebro is working overtime!!! uponit7771 Apr 2016 #109
About 20 million nt Bonobo Apr 2016 #125
Bernie will release his taxes just before the NY primary. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #132
I thought maybe while they're in Rome? ViseGrip Apr 2016 #151
As soon as somebody can come up with COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #166
One will be released before the debate.....n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #159
Also, Bernie has financial disclosures from the last 26 years here jfern Apr 2016 #171
Seriously... deathrind Apr 2016 #178
millions and millions SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #179
The 1040 has already been made public. I don't know what shills expect to find in the worksheets lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #182
Bernie's taxes are comparable to Hillary's taxes treestar Apr 2016 #187
"Bernie's TAX RETURNS" was from an email blast the other day; to counteract the transcripts amborin Apr 2016 #188
Several 0's. N/t JesterCS Apr 2016 #193
I assumed you were asking for a number of zeroes Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #209
Nothing Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #212
such disrespect for voters to refuse to release the transcripts amborin Apr 2016 #214
We don't know what is in Bernie's returns, so how can you answer what the BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #220
Tax returns are a legally required document workinclasszero Apr 2016 #221
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What is the difference be...»Reply #70