Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What is the difference between Hillary's transcripts and Bernie's IRS taxes? [View all]anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)70. The two are nothing alike as you well know.
You said in post #13 that you think Sanders' senate financial disclosures are sufficient. I am asking if you think the same is true for Ted Cruz, since he is also a US senator. Specifically, you wrote:
There is full disclosure of all his finances in the Senate record, it is a requirement and open to the public already, if there were any "laws broken", I am sure they would have caught it.
I am simply asking if you think the same standard should apply to Ted Cruz or not.
My question does not contain any implicit logical fallacies of the kind you are trying to distract people with. You are certainly going to great lengths to avoid answering a simple question.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
228 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What is the difference between Hillary's transcripts and Bernie's IRS taxes? [View all]
ViseGrip
Apr 2016
OP
Yeah, it sucks when the bottom line is that your candidate is not being transparent.
MADem
Apr 2016
#22
13.4 percent's worth of truth. If everyone paid as few taxes as Berrrnie, you wouldn't be able to
MADem
Apr 2016
#76
I think if he didn't cut that shit loose, he'd be a millionaire...and ya can't have that, can ya?
MADem
Apr 2016
#208
Well, I have tried not to use ignore very often and still only have perhaps a dozen on ignore
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#43
You have grown from a Conservative Democrat I sometimes disagreed with, but fairly decent
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#29
You are stating something as fact that is only rumor that he "will not release his tax returns"
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#50
"Will you stop beating your wife" is also a yes or no answer, one I also wouldn't answer tho.
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#64
I think they would've uncovered if he broke the law YES, that answers the question re my words fully
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#96
But .... but .... (Shirley Temple POUT) .... "It's Oooh Kaaaay if it's BERRRRRRNIE!!!!"
MADem
Apr 2016
#75
Thanks for reminding me, unlike the other poster now on ignore, you have always been abrassive
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#61
But changing so often both for the better and the worse and so very often shows little but
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#116
Flexible adherence to a moral compass that does not waver or compromise moral values is best.
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#119
Sept Sanders isn't flexible at all, matter of fact he's more dogmatic seeing there are few practical
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#120
He is flexible, just not with his morality 109 economists including Robert Reich disagree regarding
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#123
No he's not, well... until he see's he's going to totally lose a demographic... then he becomes
uponit7771
Apr 2016
#124
sigh, you should have read my full post, not that the truth matters in a big Donor corporate
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#126
I think the transcripts are going to disappoint the hell out of you eager beavers.
MADem
Apr 2016
#143
I really don't care about the transcripts, it's just a good issue to hammer.
morningfog
Apr 2016
#147
That's why Jane started sweating like a confidence man caught out on MSNBC when she was asked
MADem
Apr 2016
#168
Highly contested elections--are you high? He has only had one really tough election in recent
MADem
Apr 2016
#174
Oh, yeah, sure!!! That must mean that "progressives" make up, what--two percent of the electorate?
MADem
Apr 2016
#227
Maybe, just maybe, Jane doesn't want the 4th Estate to pull those Schedule A items apart.
MADem
Apr 2016
#142
That's a garbage cite--no link. Talks about "financial reports" -- not tax returns. Stop conflating
MADem
Apr 2016
#172
Oooooooooh (Shirley Temple Pout)! You are gonna be Soooooooo MAD when nothing comes of that!
MADem
Apr 2016
#177
Omg, your candidate appears to have sold weapons in exchange for foundation donations & you expect
JudyM
Apr 2016
#195
and Jane Sanders has committed to providing his new return as soon as it's completed,
elleng
Apr 2016
#3
in what fairy land do the bills back home stop because you are traveling?
Viva_La_Revolution
Apr 2016
#45
The electric bill goes down to nothing. If you're not paying to fill the fridge, but instead,
MADem
Apr 2016
#46
now you sound uneducated. FEC rules, you MUST spend campaign money on campaign
ViseGrip
Apr 2016
#92
That's just absurd. They are not "required to live off the campaign." That's pure NONSENSE.
MADem
Apr 2016
#129
If she'd ordered them when people started crabbing, instead of making mealy-mouthed excuses,
MADem
Apr 2016
#128
If you say so. I think I'll reserve judgement until I have some, ya know, facts.
JonLeibowitz
Apr 2016
#130
Here's one fact for you - 13.4 %; wouldn't it be nice to pay so little in income tax?
MADem
Apr 2016
#131
With receipts like these, Sanders isn't going to be able to send people to flower arranging classes,
MADem
Apr 2016
#134
If one percenters are contributing so little to the coffers, Sanders will not be able to send people
MADem
Apr 2016
#139
I'm not "shitting on" them. But it costs less to train up in those jobs than it does to attend uni
MADem
Apr 2016
#192
The topic of discussion was getting returns from the IRS. I said nothing of Turbotax.
JonLeibowitz
Apr 2016
#158
Are you seriously saying the main barrier is Jane's inability to physically access a filing cabinet?
anigbrowl
Apr 2016
#48
the real difference is that Jane had said that they will be released....Hillary won't say that,,,,
virtualobserver
Apr 2016
#52
You are right, her transcripts tell us what she really believes when she talks to big business......
virtualobserver
Apr 2016
#66
This isn't about what is in her "heart of hearts"....The smoking gun is the secrecy itself.
virtualobserver
Apr 2016
#95
The money and the lack of transparency would be fine if she wasn't running for President.......
virtualobserver
Apr 2016
#100
I am just expressing what you are claiming,,they gave her millions and it won't affect her decsions
virtualobserver
Apr 2016
#112
so then you are saying that the money will affect her decisions. Either it will or it won't.
virtualobserver
Apr 2016
#115
Au contrarie, if HRC supporters actually saw those transcripts she would have a lot less
FighttheFuture
Apr 2016
#82
She was not at GS et. al. for the food. So, Until she releases them, if ever, I will assume the
FighttheFuture
Apr 2016
#106
What I see is government politicians being bought for pennies on the dollar. It it
FighttheFuture
Apr 2016
#206
Wrong again Bob. The only people who don't care about them are Hillary supporters
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#89
Jane said they were on TurboTax. No need to go home. Just a simple click of button.
KittyWampus
Apr 2016
#56
The sad, ugly end will be in November, when your candidate loses because she's
Fawke Em
Apr 2016
#65
My candidate won't lose, and your candidate's supporters can either be a part of history or stand to
MADem
Apr 2016
#68
taxes are required by law. personal opinions given to bored people eating lousy food are not nt
msongs
Apr 2016
#18
Releasing tax returns has become a normal part of Presidential candidate politics for decades
SFnomad
Apr 2016
#21
And no others spoke to banking entities that broke our country, and got bailed out.
ViseGrip
Apr 2016
#34
You can come up with any excuse you want, but that still doesn't change the fact
SFnomad
Apr 2016
#41
Bullshit. You ignore the AMOUNTS of money. Those fees were huge and unprecedented.
BillZBubb
Apr 2016
#181
What, no presidential candidate has ever spoken to an audience of bankers before?
anigbrowl
Apr 2016
#49
Geez, are you pretending to not get it or are you just incapable of getting it?
BillZBubb
Apr 2016
#138
Bernie and Jane will release anything from their tax returns that people want to see
BernieforPres2016
Apr 2016
#24
Bernie isn't hiding his. They're on the campaign trail and Jane said she will put them out when
Zira
Apr 2016
#53
Cough (bullshit) cough. Paying 13.4 percent is interesting. 56K in deductions is INTERESTING.
MADem
Apr 2016
#71
The IRS says they have Bernie's returns, no one but Hillary has her transcripts . . . .
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#83
The 1040 has already been made public. I don't know what shills expect to find in the worksheets
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2016
#182
"Bernie's TAX RETURNS" was from an email blast the other day; to counteract the transcripts
amborin
Apr 2016
#188
We don't know what is in Bernie's returns, so how can you answer what the
BreakfastClub
Apr 2016
#220