2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: No Mr. President-she did not "intentionally" put America in danger... [View all]beedle
(1,235 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:34 PM - Edit history (1)
And carelessness is bad judgement.
Take for example Bernie, in the Daily News interview, saying he had not looked the recent decision regarding Metropolitan Life.
Sanders is not sitting in any executive position dealing with finance or the courts, and was asked about how a court case decision's (a case whose written decision had not been as yet release yet for Sander to have examined,) legal implications, would play out in terms of Bank Breakups. He was held responsible for not taking into considerations things that he had no way of knowing ... this was considered a 'fail' and used to question his qualifications to be president.
Hillary was in such a position, and acted carelessly with information that if released could have indeed caused a national security issue (not to mention her using it to hide that she was secretly going against the president's direct orders.) But for some reason this is a great big 'nothing'??
Sanders answers a stupid question honestly, and he gets ripped apart ... Hillary cheats, lies, and is careless in the extreme, and one would think she was a hero because she got lucky and (so far) nothing serious came of it?