2016 Postmortem

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)

78. This is depressing news to republicans. I mean Republicans and Sanders supporters.....LOL

Reply to Bill USA (Original post)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 06:29 PM

Mar 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

107 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Experts Agree Clinton Indictment "Chatter Is Just Plain Ridiculous." [View all] Bill USA Mar 2016 OP

That's not what I'm seeing... not by a long shot yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #1

Paul Krugman feels it is so outrageous that Hortensis Apr 2016 #98

Media Matters? noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #2

again, a Bernie "supporter" talking just like a Repugnant. Censoring those who don't agree with you Bill USA Mar 2016 #8

It's Not Censorship noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #11

identify a mistatement of fact or twisting the facts in the article. You are doing what any Bill USA Mar 2016 #16

Sorry Dude noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #18

you made my case for me. It's well known that Republicans attack Mediamatters because it is the Bill USA Mar 2016 #63

Media Matters - ur not serious 840high Mar 2016 #31

Republicans attack media matters just as they attack any legitimate source of information because Bill USA Mar 2016 #66

Republicans hate MM because it has shown Fox News to be misrepresenting the facts so often. Bill USA Mar 2016 #67

You do know what he did to Anita Hill, don't you? noiretextatique Apr 2016 #102

the excerpt from the MM article was an excerpt from a Talking Points Memo article. I guess the GOP Bill USA Mar 2016 #65

Media Matters = David Brock = HRC propaganda. nt Electric Monk Mar 2016 #3

again, a Bernie "supporter" talking just like a Repugnant. Censoring those who don't agree with you Bill USA Mar 2016 #6

Second judge says Clinton email setup may have been in 'bad faith' - Reuters Electric Monk Mar 2016 #7

Repugnants never give up on a pseudo scandal, do you? Bill USA Mar 2016 #14

LOL, two judges = pseudo scandal. Ok. merrily Mar 2016 #21

the IC IG did not make a criminal referral- it was a security referral - Intelligence Community IG & Bill USA Mar 2016 #59

The Hillary Clinton e-mail ‘scandal’ that isn’t - from WaPo Bill USA Mar 2016 #61

got any links? Here I'll help, look on the FOX cable news site. ROFL MediaMatters has a long Bill USA Apr 2016 #96

Open your eyes. 840high Mar 2016 #34

better tune in Oreilly and Varney to get an update on what your thoughts are..LOL Bill USA Mar 2016 #70

Let's see - you called me a republican, you 840high Mar 2016 #86

anyone who parrots GOP McCarthyist attacks of HRC is a Repugnant in effect, or in hopelessness Bill USA Apr 2016 #99

This literally came out of a HRC propaganda factory AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #54

YOu are thinking what O'Reilly and Varney have told you to think..LOL Bill USA Mar 2016 #69

come on AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #94

cite anything in the article referenced in OP. make a case against the CONTENT, if you can. Even the Bill USA Apr 2016 #105

Another wingnut Reagan appointee, of course. bornskeptic Mar 2016 #88

No one has been more zealous about source shaming than Hillary's supporters. merrily Mar 2016 #17

oh my, I'll say it again, please provide documentation, links. Without that, you got nothin' Bill USA Mar 2016 #73

Some people never see how wrong they are--and on the rare occasions that they do, they merrily Mar 2016 #92

Amazing how Bernie supporters hate Democratic media sites, but love to geek tragedy Mar 2016 #26

Why can't you admit that it's total HRC propaganda at this point, just propaganda that you like? nt Electric Monk Mar 2016 #30

Media Matters defended John Kerry, and it defended Barack Obama against rightwing smear campaigns. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #36

I don't like Brock, neither 840high Mar 2016 #35

who do you prefer, Trump or Clinton? geek tragedy Mar 2016 #37

Sanders, Warren, Biden. 840high Mar 2016 #48

So, the former it is nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #49

Nice job of repeating what your 'oracles' O'Reilly and Varney tell you to think Bill USA Mar 2016 #68

That is what fox news and Bill Oreilly say, all the time. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #77

Even a broken clock is right twice a day Electric Monk Mar 2016 #82

So lets recap, nothing nice to say about Hillary Clinton, nice stuff to say about O'Reilly though Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #83

I have nothing nice to say about O'Really. I never watch FAUX Noise. Electric Monk Mar 2016 #89

When u hear GOPers here calling MediaMatters a propaganda site they're parroting O'Reilly & Varney Bill USA Apr 2016 #95

Best part: Media Matters admits that Hillary might be indicted! thesquanderer Apr 2016 #106

Here, let me help: merrily Mar 2016 #4

here, let me help. the quote is not from Brock. LOL! Bill USA Mar 2016 #10

? Please quote where I indicated in any way that the quote was from Brock? merrily Mar 2016 #12

+1 Marr Mar 2016 #24

Media Matters! David Brock's organization! CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #5

again, a Bernie "supporter" talking just like a Repugnant. Censoring those who don't agree with you Bill USA Mar 2016 #9

What is it that you think you're trying to do when you associate posters merrily Mar 2016 #19

Must be tbeir latest strategy now. hrmbaja Mar 2016 #29

They've been doing it for years. Criticize any Democrat from the left merrily Mar 2016 #46

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #104

The "experts" have no f'ing clue. But indictment or not, this is a serious matter. reformist2 Mar 2016 #13

This new-found zeal for National Security is amusing. ucrdem Mar 2016 #15

Intentional violation of federal law by a candidate for POTUS is no biggie. merrily Mar 2016 #20

I'm touched by all this patriotism. nt ucrdem Mar 2016 #33

I'm touched by your denial. 840high Mar 2016 #39

Is that you, Lee? merrily Mar 2016 #50

Experts are speculating like us non-experts...n/t blueintelligentsia Mar 2016 #22

All I can say is sadoldgirl Mar 2016 #23

you may get your wish grasswire Mar 2016 #28

The devotees of Unicorn J. Sparklepony, out of desperation, cosmicone Mar 2016 #25

the Indictment Fairy is going to leave a lot of people geek tragedy Mar 2016 #27

Josh does not even understand the difference between retroactive marking jeff47 Mar 2016 #32

clap louder for the Indictment Fairy!! The Indictment Fairy is your only hope!! nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #38

I'm curious, have you totally stopped caring about hides and your transparency page? Electric Monk Mar 2016 #41

You care more about it than I do. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #42

I'm so happy Skinner made it so you can post whatever you want. jeff47 Mar 2016 #43

the jury system still exists. And to me, people citing Matt Drudge's blogroll to attack Democrats geek tragedy Mar 2016 #45

Go ahead and quote me citing Drudge. jeff47 Mar 2016 #52

Name one person who was prosecuted for doing what Clinton did. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #55

There's tons of examples. They're not famous, so they actually get prosecuted. jeff47 Mar 2016 #57

Hating Hillary is not a substitute for legal training. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #58

and all of this ignores what else may have been found while searching lakeguy Mar 2016 #87

Its a GOP and Bernie die hards wet dream. DCBob Mar 2016 #40

Did anyone notice the date of this article? February 1st! paulthompson Mar 2016 #44

Also, they are just speculating like the rest of us n/t blueintelligentsia Mar 2016 #47

hahaha! Nice catch! frylock Mar 2016 #56

Well done! RufusTFirefly Mar 2016 #85

There will be no indictment of Hillary Clinton due to the silly e-mail claims Gothmog Mar 2016 #51

Ignorance of the law is no excuse... k8conant Mar 2016 #53

AHEM. Let me repeat just in case you missed it. Media Matters = David Brock = Hillary Inc. Avalux Mar 2016 #60

A better title would be madville Mar 2016 #62

I don't believe these legal experts work for Clinton DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #72

You're joking right? madville Mar 2016 #74

She's a Democrat and Democrats contribute to her. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #75

My opinion doesn't matter at all madville Mar 2016 #81

I edited my post... At first I took you at your word. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #84

You're correct madville Mar 2016 #90

Blumenthal is a private citizen so if someone sent him classified information they have legal ... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #91

How much of the FBI evidence have these 'experts' reviewed? B2G Mar 2016 #64

Well that settles it, grntuscarora Mar 2016 #71

ugh Media Matters and David Brock... revbones Mar 2016 #76

This is depressing news to republicans. I mean Republicans and Sanders supporters.....LOL Trust Buster Mar 2016 #78

Was I the only one who read the ABC News snippet which agreed with MMfA? LonePirate Mar 2016 #79

Experts agree! RufusTFirefly Mar 2016 #80

This thread is hilarious Lans Mar 2016 #93

who needs experts when you can listen to a guy who knows nothing of the law, hasn't graduated Bill USA Apr 2016 #97

so glad to have Repugnants on the site. They keep on wishin' and hopin' ..LOL Bill USA Apr 2016 #100

The only people I see perpetuating this are the wingnuts and sander supporters. AgadorSparticus Apr 2016 #101

"Experts" agree that Anita Hill is a "little bit nutty and a little bit slutty" jfern Apr 2016 #103

here's another from the GOP (and Bernie supporters) Alternate Universe Recoverin_Republican Apr 2016 #107