2016 Postmortem

madville

(7,412 posts)

74. You're joking right?

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 06:15 PM

Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:15 PM - Edit history (2)

In most of the articles you cited either the author or the cited sources or both are current or past political campaign donors to Hillary Clinton lol. That's why I said "either work for or support" in my post above.

Most of those sources are biased in some way. This website is easy to use if you haven't checked it out before:

http://www.fec.gov/finance/disclosure/norindsea.shtml

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

107 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Experts Agree Clinton Indictment "Chatter Is Just Plain Ridiculous." [View all] Bill USA Mar 2016 OP

That's not what I'm seeing... not by a long shot yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #1

Paul Krugman feels it is so outrageous that Hortensis Apr 2016 #98

Media Matters? noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #2

again, a Bernie "supporter" talking just like a Repugnant. Censoring those who don't agree with you Bill USA Mar 2016 #8

It's Not Censorship noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #11

identify a mistatement of fact or twisting the facts in the article. You are doing what any Bill USA Mar 2016 #16

Sorry Dude noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #18

you made my case for me. It's well known that Republicans attack Mediamatters because it is the Bill USA Mar 2016 #63

Media Matters - ur not serious 840high Mar 2016 #31

Republicans attack media matters just as they attack any legitimate source of information because Bill USA Mar 2016 #66

Republicans hate MM because it has shown Fox News to be misrepresenting the facts so often. Bill USA Mar 2016 #67

You do know what he did to Anita Hill, don't you? noiretextatique Apr 2016 #102

the excerpt from the MM article was an excerpt from a Talking Points Memo article. I guess the GOP Bill USA Mar 2016 #65

Media Matters = David Brock = HRC propaganda. nt Electric Monk Mar 2016 #3

again, a Bernie "supporter" talking just like a Repugnant. Censoring those who don't agree with you Bill USA Mar 2016 #6

Second judge says Clinton email setup may have been in 'bad faith' - Reuters Electric Monk Mar 2016 #7

Repugnants never give up on a pseudo scandal, do you? Bill USA Mar 2016 #14

LOL, two judges = pseudo scandal. Ok. merrily Mar 2016 #21

the IC IG did not make a criminal referral- it was a security referral - Intelligence Community IG & Bill USA Mar 2016 #59

The Hillary Clinton e-mail ‘scandal’ that isn’t - from WaPo Bill USA Mar 2016 #61

got any links? Here I'll help, look on the FOX cable news site. ROFL MediaMatters has a long Bill USA Apr 2016 #96

Open your eyes. 840high Mar 2016 #34

better tune in Oreilly and Varney to get an update on what your thoughts are..LOL Bill USA Mar 2016 #70

Let's see - you called me a republican, you 840high Mar 2016 #86

anyone who parrots GOP McCarthyist attacks of HRC is a Repugnant in effect, or in hopelessness Bill USA Apr 2016 #99

This literally came out of a HRC propaganda factory AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #54

YOu are thinking what O'Reilly and Varney have told you to think..LOL Bill USA Mar 2016 #69

come on AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #94

cite anything in the article referenced in OP. make a case against the CONTENT, if you can. Even the Bill USA Apr 2016 #105

Another wingnut Reagan appointee, of course. bornskeptic Mar 2016 #88

No one has been more zealous about source shaming than Hillary's supporters. merrily Mar 2016 #17

oh my, I'll say it again, please provide documentation, links. Without that, you got nothin' Bill USA Mar 2016 #73

Some people never see how wrong they are--and on the rare occasions that they do, they merrily Mar 2016 #92

Amazing how Bernie supporters hate Democratic media sites, but love to geek tragedy Mar 2016 #26

Why can't you admit that it's total HRC propaganda at this point, just propaganda that you like? nt Electric Monk Mar 2016 #30

Media Matters defended John Kerry, and it defended Barack Obama against rightwing smear campaigns. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #36

I don't like Brock, neither 840high Mar 2016 #35

who do you prefer, Trump or Clinton? geek tragedy Mar 2016 #37

Sanders, Warren, Biden. 840high Mar 2016 #48

So, the former it is nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #49

Nice job of repeating what your 'oracles' O'Reilly and Varney tell you to think Bill USA Mar 2016 #68

That is what fox news and Bill Oreilly say, all the time. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #77

Even a broken clock is right twice a day Electric Monk Mar 2016 #82

So lets recap, nothing nice to say about Hillary Clinton, nice stuff to say about O'Reilly though Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #83

I have nothing nice to say about O'Really. I never watch FAUX Noise. Electric Monk Mar 2016 #89

When u hear GOPers here calling MediaMatters a propaganda site they're parroting O'Reilly & Varney Bill USA Apr 2016 #95

Best part: Media Matters admits that Hillary might be indicted! thesquanderer Apr 2016 #106

Here, let me help: merrily Mar 2016 #4

here, let me help. the quote is not from Brock. LOL! Bill USA Mar 2016 #10

? Please quote where I indicated in any way that the quote was from Brock? merrily Mar 2016 #12

+1 Marr Mar 2016 #24

Media Matters! David Brock's organization! CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #5

again, a Bernie "supporter" talking just like a Repugnant. Censoring those who don't agree with you Bill USA Mar 2016 #9

What is it that you think you're trying to do when you associate posters merrily Mar 2016 #19

Must be tbeir latest strategy now. hrmbaja Mar 2016 #29

They've been doing it for years. Criticize any Democrat from the left merrily Mar 2016 #46

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #104

The "experts" have no f'ing clue. But indictment or not, this is a serious matter. reformist2 Mar 2016 #13

This new-found zeal for National Security is amusing. ucrdem Mar 2016 #15

Intentional violation of federal law by a candidate for POTUS is no biggie. merrily Mar 2016 #20

I'm touched by all this patriotism. nt ucrdem Mar 2016 #33

I'm touched by your denial. 840high Mar 2016 #39

Is that you, Lee? merrily Mar 2016 #50

Experts are speculating like us non-experts...n/t blueintelligentsia Mar 2016 #22

All I can say is sadoldgirl Mar 2016 #23

you may get your wish grasswire Mar 2016 #28

The devotees of Unicorn J. Sparklepony, out of desperation, cosmicone Mar 2016 #25

the Indictment Fairy is going to leave a lot of people geek tragedy Mar 2016 #27

Josh does not even understand the difference between retroactive marking jeff47 Mar 2016 #32

clap louder for the Indictment Fairy!! The Indictment Fairy is your only hope!! nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #38

I'm curious, have you totally stopped caring about hides and your transparency page? Electric Monk Mar 2016 #41

You care more about it than I do. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #42

I'm so happy Skinner made it so you can post whatever you want. jeff47 Mar 2016 #43

the jury system still exists. And to me, people citing Matt Drudge's blogroll to attack Democrats geek tragedy Mar 2016 #45

Go ahead and quote me citing Drudge. jeff47 Mar 2016 #52

Name one person who was prosecuted for doing what Clinton did. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #55

There's tons of examples. They're not famous, so they actually get prosecuted. jeff47 Mar 2016 #57

Hating Hillary is not a substitute for legal training. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #58

and all of this ignores what else may have been found while searching lakeguy Mar 2016 #87

Its a GOP and Bernie die hards wet dream. DCBob Mar 2016 #40

Did anyone notice the date of this article? February 1st! paulthompson Mar 2016 #44

Also, they are just speculating like the rest of us n/t blueintelligentsia Mar 2016 #47

hahaha! Nice catch! frylock Mar 2016 #56

Well done! RufusTFirefly Mar 2016 #85

There will be no indictment of Hillary Clinton due to the silly e-mail claims Gothmog Mar 2016 #51

Ignorance of the law is no excuse... k8conant Mar 2016 #53

AHEM. Let me repeat just in case you missed it. Media Matters = David Brock = Hillary Inc. Avalux Mar 2016 #60

A better title would be madville Mar 2016 #62

I don't believe these legal experts work for Clinton DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #72

You're joking right? madville Mar 2016 #74

She's a Democrat and Democrats contribute to her. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #75

My opinion doesn't matter at all madville Mar 2016 #81

I edited my post... At first I took you at your word. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #84

You're correct madville Mar 2016 #90

Blumenthal is a private citizen so if someone sent him classified information they have legal ... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #91

How much of the FBI evidence have these 'experts' reviewed? B2G Mar 2016 #64

Well that settles it, grntuscarora Mar 2016 #71

ugh Media Matters and David Brock... revbones Mar 2016 #76

This is depressing news to republicans. I mean Republicans and Sanders supporters.....LOL Trust Buster Mar 2016 #78

Was I the only one who read the ABC News snippet which agreed with MMfA? LonePirate Mar 2016 #79

Experts agree! RufusTFirefly Mar 2016 #80

This thread is hilarious Lans Mar 2016 #93

who needs experts when you can listen to a guy who knows nothing of the law, hasn't graduated Bill USA Apr 2016 #97

so glad to have Repugnants on the site. They keep on wishin' and hopin' ..LOL Bill USA Apr 2016 #100

The only people I see perpetuating this are the wingnuts and sander supporters. AgadorSparticus Apr 2016 #101

"Experts" agree that Anita Hill is a "little bit nutty and a little bit slutty" jfern Apr 2016 #103

here's another from the GOP (and Bernie supporters) Alternate Universe Recoverin_Republican Apr 2016 #107