2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Rosario Dawson, how dare you lecture Dolores Huerta? [View all]shadowandblossom
(718 posts)and to treat a woman who has dedicated her life to helping others like she is corrupt, simply because Huerta believes Sanders is not as good a choice to serve as President as Clinton is. Obama has nothing to do with this subject.
If you thought this article was about how Dolores Huerta can't be wrong you didn't read the whole thing. To me it seemed more about how Sander's can't be wrong, and those who disagree with him get called corrupt, even in cases like Huerta, where they clearly aren't. So stop deflecting and erecting strawmen.
You said, "Rosario Dawson correct..."
Is it "wrong" to disagree with Sanders? Does disagreeing with Sander's make a person "establishment." If not why is it right for Dawson to call Huerta, a lifelong activist, "establishment," for disagreeing with Sanders. Prove that Huerta, is "establishment" and prove that she is corrupt as is being implied by Dawson.
Go ahead, embarrass yourself.