2016 Postmortem

onenote

(42,799 posts)

102. here are schedules going back 100 years. Knock yourself out.

Reply to kristopher (Reply #100)

Sun Mar 20, 2016, 04:19 PM

Mar 2016

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/Hx/PresidentialPrimariesDates.phtml

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

123 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders Campaign Could Win In Spite of Corporate Media Spin [View all] Jefferson23 Mar 2016 OP

Yes he can! NWCorona Mar 2016 #1

Sanders would win, Hillary, not Baobab Mar 2016 #13

"Voters wont turn out for Hillary..." kristopher Mar 2016 #42

Triangulation getting old and tired Baobab Mar 2016 #45

Tough To "Write In" On Electronic Voting Machines... However TOTALLY AGREE... CorporatistNation Mar 2016 #66

She's also the strongest vote getter in the field. onenote Mar 2016 #74

Not fact, you are drawing a conclusion based on only appx. 50% of planned sampling. kristopher Mar 2016 #77

To date, she is the strongest vote getter in the field onenote Mar 2016 #81

And that makes it meaningless as regarding your point, doesn't it. kristopher Mar 2016 #85

The fact that the usual schedule worked to Clinton's favor doesn't indicate a conspiracy onenote Mar 2016 #88

Didn't say it was a conspiracy - that's a poor attempt to deflect away from yr failure kristopher Mar 2016 #90

As a student of social science I suggest you study Jesse Jackson's run onenote Mar 2016 #97

Post the '88, '12 and '16 primary schedules and lets do it here. kristopher Mar 2016 #100

here are schedules going back 100 years. Knock yourself out. onenote Mar 2016 #102

Y'all are the ones denying that the primary schedule is front loaded to favor Clinton kristopher Mar 2016 #104

And so it was front loaded to favor that well-known conservative Jesse Jackson? onenote Mar 2016 #106

Sure, that's why she has more votes than any other candidate running lunamagica Mar 2016 #93

Poor reasoning skills seem to plague the Clinton supporters kristopher Mar 2016 #94

But the straws, they are so graspy! dchill Mar 2016 #95

See you on April 19! Oh, can't wait for NY where the Sanders camp will be CHRUSHED lunamagica Mar 2016 #99

Bookmarking for when she wins both the delegates and the popular vote. Your pesonal attacks lunamagica Mar 2016 #98

It isn't a personal attack to point out that the LOGIC of a persons argument fails scrutiny. kristopher Mar 2016 #101

" Poor reasoning skills seem to plague the Clinton supporters" Sure is an attack. Very insulting lunamagica Mar 2016 #105

Yes indeed! vintx Mar 2016 #2

K&R Rebkeh Mar 2016 #3

Bolding a whole text ALWAYS makes it seem "truthier"... Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #4

Please knock yourself out and find anything about the author that is false, then post Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #6

.../... Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #10

Clearly your point is you enjoy creating posts with zero merit. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #11

As pkdu so aptly says elsewhere in this thread... Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #12

You made a false claim in your first post. I called you out on it and you came up Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #14

That's what passes for informed discussion among the Clinton supporters. kristopher Mar 2016 #19

I saw that and recommended it, and one can see from the responses how Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #26

Get go, let go....whatever. Pointing out the annoying and manipulative Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #20

You equated the highlight not as annoying, you equated it to mean it was used to make Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #22

Just what IS the justification for bolding a whole long passage, Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #30

Does the Clinton campaign have a primer on discussion disruption? kristopher Mar 2016 #32

Hum, let me think. No, can't say I've undergone any training Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #37

Bolding is what you claim its to be for? Bullshit, you're merely attempting to cover up Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #33

Yep. kristopher Mar 2016 #39

Say, what? Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #41

You don't own the reasoning and to claim you do is absurd. Nothing was garbled by me, Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #43

Yikes...spare me more of this: Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #44

More tabloid nonsense, the same tactic you used when you entered the thread. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #46

Brock, Brock? Someone related to Spock? Never heard of Brock. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #47

You know him well, you've been demonstrating the connection/tactics since your first Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #50

Sorry, can't say I do. Who be he? Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #51

Look in the mirror. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #53

I see a greying 70-year-old female retiree. Is that what I'm supposed to see? Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #55

He's right there...the evidence is in each of your posts from your first Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #60

Sorry, but who the hell is "HE"? Very cryptic. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #61

lol You do rely on pretending not to be aware of Clinton's Brock campaign Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #64

.../... Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #67

It's my thread and you decided to add baseless smears not me. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #69

Hilarious exchange. First time I've laughed my ass off on this site in a long time. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #107

No conspiracy, just her baseless smears. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #108

Her criticisms of you bolding your text or is there something I missed? kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #109

The claim was, bolding the text was utilized to ensure it was viewed as "truthier." Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #110

My tongue was firmly in my cheek, I must admit... Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #115

Tabloids and yellow journalists, eh? SMC22307 Mar 2016 #111

Your observation is perfectly valid. Overbearingly bold style can be VERY annoying, Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #116

lol Still doubling down I see. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #118

Thank you both for giving me a good laugh. It is very needed in this frequently ugly place! kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #121

You're very welcome...it was a funny exchange. lol Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #122

Don't waste your time.... brooklynite Mar 2016 #5

Your concern for our time is duly noted...thanks for stopping by. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #8

Do me a favor and post some graphs tracking your claims, 'kay? kristopher Mar 2016 #17

The more I got to know him.... MaggieD Mar 2016 #27

You earned my first total ignore. nt DemocracyDirect Mar 2016 #34

Agreed, had the same experiences. And he completely turned my husband off in a short R B Garr Mar 2016 #123

Robert is a Professor of Media and not Political Science. Thats why , presumably , he says things pkdu Mar 2016 #7

Yea, I mean what would he know. lol Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #9

Well, that is the questin, innit? Adrahil Mar 2016 #40

Supposed expertise, you mean like Nate Silver who screwed up big time about Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #48

I listened to the interview onenote Mar 2016 #75

You may believe he undercuts his own argument yet you have just highlighted Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #78

A chance is there. But his claim that his chances are still "very strong" is a stretch onenote Mar 2016 #86

Look, you can ignore that he beat the odds thus far or not. I'm not ignoring Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #89

“101 most dangerous professors in America.” kristopher Mar 2016 #15

A badge of honor, yes. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #18

And maybe they'd think about doing their job again. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #16

Yes! Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #21

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #23

Excellent video! marions ghost Mar 2016 #24

LMAO! MaggieD Mar 2016 #25

Its not Corporate Media - Its the Centerist Dems FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #28

Owned by and working for the same people, what's the difference? nolabels Mar 2016 #112

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #29

Bernie Is The Only Antidote To Rampant DNC DWS DLC HRC Third-Way Corporatist Corruption cantbeserious Mar 2016 #31

1172 to 846...nt SidDithers Mar 2016 #35

We know, maybe you aren't aware of the meaning of could win. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #38

I understand the meaning of "could win". But he's claiming there is a good chance Bernie will win onenote Mar 2016 #76

He does have a good chance, based on the fact he has already beaten the odds Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #79

We will just have to agree to disagree on what a 'good chance' means. onenote Mar 2016 #82

Yes, evidently his past performance is not a confidence builder for some. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #84

McChesney is denying those odds, however. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #119

An upset is not impossible, that is how I interpreted his assessment. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #120

excellent and accurate yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #36

And if he does, I hope that all Democrats will ban together and support him. anotherproletariat Mar 2016 #49

Yes, and pigs could fly outta my butt. n/t Lil Missy Mar 2016 #52

Hmm. That's rough. nt ladjf Mar 2016 #56

Do you prefer to present visuals like that, what does it mean..exactly? n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #58

It might be close to being a miracle but then there have been some ladjf Mar 2016 #54

I agree but the point is we have enough going for us to fight it out and Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #57

The media and his opponent are doing everything they can to squish Bernie Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2016 #59

Or maybe more democrats feel Clinton is the better candidate? tia uponit7771 Mar 2016 #62

No one is suggesting a conspiracy theory, if that's what you meant. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #72

I was thinking about this earlier today. Vinca Mar 2016 #63

There is no doubt in my mind if Bernie succeeded he would receive similar Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #65

You're right. I must be having a faint hearted kind of day. Vinca Mar 2016 #68

I apologize if my response came across suggesting you were not Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #70

I didn't take it that way at all. Vinca Mar 2016 #71

Ok , good..thanks. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #73

It's a long way until August. Anything can happen. If I were Bernie, I'd stay in! reformist2 Mar 2016 #87

I saw the thread subject line and thought--oh noonzz-its H. A. Goodman!! riversedge Mar 2016 #80

If you were as confident as you claim I doubt you'd be in this thread. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #83

What a silly post. riversedge Mar 2016 #91

You enter the thread with a baseless smear and add a Clinton flower logo and I'm Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #92

I am not confused, i always come to primaries forum to see flowers nolabels Mar 2016 #114

Yes We Can! Jenny_92808 Mar 2016 #96

K & R AzDar Mar 2016 #103

McChesney is right that Sanders has done amazingly well, but... Garrett78 Mar 2016 #113

KICK! ('n' rec) pat_k Mar 2016 #117