Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders Campaign Could Win In Spite of Corporate Media Spin [View all]Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)83. If you were as confident as you claim I doubt you'd be in this thread. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tough To "Write In" On Electronic Voting Machines... However TOTALLY AGREE...
CorporatistNation
Mar 2016
#66
Not fact, you are drawing a conclusion based on only appx. 50% of planned sampling.
kristopher
Mar 2016
#77
The fact that the usual schedule worked to Clinton's favor doesn't indicate a conspiracy
onenote
Mar 2016
#88
Didn't say it was a conspiracy - that's a poor attempt to deflect away from yr failure
kristopher
Mar 2016
#90
Y'all are the ones denying that the primary schedule is front loaded to favor Clinton
kristopher
Mar 2016
#104
And so it was front loaded to favor that well-known conservative Jesse Jackson?
onenote
Mar 2016
#106
See you on April 19! Oh, can't wait for NY where the Sanders camp will be CHRUSHED
lunamagica
Mar 2016
#99
Bookmarking for when she wins both the delegates and the popular vote. Your pesonal attacks
lunamagica
Mar 2016
#98
It isn't a personal attack to point out that the LOGIC of a persons argument fails scrutiny.
kristopher
Mar 2016
#101
" Poor reasoning skills seem to plague the Clinton supporters" Sure is an attack. Very insulting
lunamagica
Mar 2016
#105
Please knock yourself out and find anything about the author that is false, then post
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#6
You made a false claim in your first post. I called you out on it and you came up
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#14
You equated the highlight not as annoying, you equated it to mean it was used to make
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#22
Bolding is what you claim its to be for? Bullshit, you're merely attempting to cover up
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#33
You don't own the reasoning and to claim you do is absurd. Nothing was garbled by me,
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#43
More tabloid nonsense, the same tactic you used when you entered the thread.
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#46
You know him well, you've been demonstrating the connection/tactics since your first
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#50
I see a greying 70-year-old female retiree. Is that what I'm supposed to see?
Surya Gayatri
Mar 2016
#55
Hilarious exchange. First time I've laughed my ass off on this site in a long time.
kerry-is-my-prez
Mar 2016
#107
Her criticisms of you bolding your text or is there something I missed?
kerry-is-my-prez
Mar 2016
#109
The claim was, bolding the text was utilized to ensure it was viewed as "truthier."
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#110
Your observation is perfectly valid. Overbearingly bold style can be VERY annoying,
Surya Gayatri
Mar 2016
#116
Thank you both for giving me a good laugh. It is very needed in this frequently ugly place!
kerry-is-my-prez
Mar 2016
#121
Agreed, had the same experiences. And he completely turned my husband off in a short
R B Garr
Mar 2016
#123
Robert is a Professor of Media and not Political Science. Thats why , presumably , he says things
pkdu
Mar 2016
#7
Supposed expertise, you mean like Nate Silver who screwed up big time about
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#48
You may believe he undercuts his own argument yet you have just highlighted
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#78
A chance is there. But his claim that his chances are still "very strong" is a stretch
onenote
Mar 2016
#86
Look, you can ignore that he beat the odds thus far or not. I'm not ignoring
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#89
Bernie Is The Only Antidote To Rampant DNC DWS DLC HRC Third-Way Corporatist Corruption
cantbeserious
Mar 2016
#31
I understand the meaning of "could win". But he's claiming there is a good chance Bernie will win
onenote
Mar 2016
#76
He does have a good chance, based on the fact he has already beaten the odds
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#79
And if he does, I hope that all Democrats will ban together and support him.
anotherproletariat
Mar 2016
#49
Do you prefer to present visuals like that, what does it mean..exactly? n/t
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#58
The media and his opponent are doing everything they can to squish Bernie
Rosa Luxemburg
Mar 2016
#59
It's a long way until August. Anything can happen. If I were Bernie, I'd stay in!
reformist2
Mar 2016
#87
You enter the thread with a baseless smear and add a Clinton flower logo and I'm
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#92